Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝗕𝘂𝗹𝗹𝘆𝗣𝗢𝗣

@BULLYP0P

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,558subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002362793151
TypeChannel
Username@BULLYP0P
Description␥ The fringes of the music industry, facts and analysis about various artists ⤿ ␥ ربات ناشناس : https://t.me/IncogNoteBot?start=u7xt0kg5pe ␥ چنل انون : - https://t.me/+BwP0TEWnpQw5YzI0 ␥ چنل ارشیو : - @archiveBULLY
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BULLYP0P

Growth

5,5585,5895,573.57 August 2026 — 5,589 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,581 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,558 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,553–5,594 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 18:355,558-23
8 Aug 2026, 02:255,581-8
7 Aug 2026, 15:165,589first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.9%
avg views ÷ 5,558 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,000
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held29 (5 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total57,920
Reactions total3,128
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,700
Videos
485
Links
55

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 31s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,128 reactions across 29 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😭2,00564.1%
❤‍🔥52516.8%
👍2507.99%
🔥1033.29%
💋953.04%
👎752.40%
👀481.53%
💘190.607%
💔80.256%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC≈1,000 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

ویدیویی که جدیدا از ' اشر ' وایرال شده باعث عصبانیت شدید کاربران شده. - تو این ویدیو آشر با اینکه میتونه خودش خیلی راحت در رو نگه داره اما یکی از پرسنل رو صدا میزنه برای این کار و وقتی اون در رو نگه داشت بعد از در رد میشه. - خیلی ها اونو یه عوضی تمام عیار خطاب کردن و گفتن سلبریتی ها فکر میکنن کارمند ها و کارگر ها برده اونا هستن و همین باعث میشه ما از همچین پولدارایی بیشتر متنفر باشیم. ؛حجم هیت ها خیلی زیاد بوده و یک

👍57👀4

11 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC≈1,160 views88 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

این ویدیو تو توییتر خیلی وایرال شده و واکنش های مختلفی گرفته. - یکی از کابران چینی گفته که ماجرا اینه دوست پسر این زن با یه مرد بهش خیانت کرده. ─ @BULLYP0P

🔥72👀14👎2

11 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC≈1,610 views103 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

منتشر شده از جنا اورتگا که بعضی کاربران ابراز نگرانی کردن براش و بعضی هم گفتن تصمیم خودشه و به بهانه نگرانی دارید بادی شیمش میکنید. ─ @BULLYP0P

😭92💘6👀2💔2👍1

11 Aug 2026, 20:19 UTC≈1,630 views100 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

بعد از منتشر شدن ترک لیست آلبوم جدید بنی بلانکو یه کاربر توییتی زده که وایرال شده. - اگه اجازه بدید این مرد یهودی با اهنگای لاتینش چارت کنه همتون میرید جهنم.؟😭 ─ @BULLYP0P

😭94👀4👍2

11 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC≈2,170 views124 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

وایرال شده از روز های هفته با کتزای ─ @BULLYP0P

😭113👍8👎3

11 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC≈2,190 views134 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

نشریه 'پیچفورک' درباره تایلا : -تو زمانی که ستاره های بزرگ موسیقی زدن تو کار فروختن کرم مرطوب کننده و یا دارن درباره مسائل فلسفی حرف میزنن و تو این فازان ما یک دیوا داریم که میتونیم به موسیقیش واقعا گوش بدیم. ─ @BULLYP0P

😭121❤‍🔥11👎2

11 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC≈2,090 views175 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

پیچفورک در مقاله جدیدی گفته که وقفه طولانی ریانا در صنعت موسیقی باعث شده جا برای یه صدای جذاب و گیرا باز بشه و تایلا همونیه که جای خالی ریانا رو پر کرده. - بعد از این گفته پیچفورک حتی فنای تایلا هم از این نشریه خواستن که اینو از سایتش پاک کنه چون ستاپه. ─ @BULLYP0P

😭165👎9👀1

10 Aug 2026, 21:36 UTC≈2,080 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

طبق پیش بینی 'GoldDerby' شانس نامزدی Ella Langley و Sienna Spiro در کتگوری 'Best New Artist' مراسم گرمی2027 بالای '95'درصد هست. طی 9 سال گذشته فقط آرتیست های 'زن' برنده این بخش بودن. ─ @BULLYP0P

❤‍🔥55👍1🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC≈2,090 views66 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

؛ ترک لیست آلبوم جدید بنی بلانکو با عنوان 'Hermoso' که در تاریخ 14 اگست منتشر میشه. 1. Un Poco Perdido (with Neton Vega) 2. Te Olvido (La La) (with Selena Gomez and Becky G) 3. Joven Y Salvaje (with Bb trickz) 4. Memoria De Paz (with The Marías) 5. Te Amo 6. Ay Bendito (with Mora and Ovy on the drums) 7. Cinco 8. Degenere (with Myke Towers) ─ @BULLYP0P

😭58🔥4👍2👎2

10 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC≈2,050 views143 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

منتشر شده از 'Anne Hathaway' که کاربران گفتن ریانا برای همیشه نحوه ای که بقیه بارداریشون رو نشون میدن تغییر داد. ─ @BULLYP0P

😭116❤‍🔥21💘6

9 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC≈2,190 views134 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

این ویدیو از کاور آهنگ "bad" مایکل جکسون توسط بیلی ایلیش دوباره وایرال شده و خیلیا گفتن فاجعه بوده و بعضی دیگه ازش دفاع کردن و گفتن فقط 15 سالش بوده ؛ بیلی رو رها کنید لطفا. همچنین خیلی ها گفتن اون موقع اون هرچی میخوند و کاور می‌کرد حتی اگه فاجعه بود ازش می‌گذشتن اما الان نه و این کاور رسما آلودگی صوتیه. ─ @BULLYP0P

👍95❤‍🔥23😭11👎4💋1

9 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC≈2,250 views120 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

طبق گزارش ها ؛ مایلی سایرس ، سزا و تیم قراره هدلاینر کوچلای 2027 باشن. ─ @BULLYP0P

😭100❤‍🔥15👎3💋2

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @BULLYP0P. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 589,332 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗕𝘂𝗹𝗹𝘆𝗣𝗢𝗣” (@BULLYP0P), 5,558 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BULLYP0P.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.