π·7 date fb numbar-anymail cookie riport π·Basic rate=9.50 tk π·Fresh acc riport 99-100% always
β€6π2π₯°2π1π1

Channel
@BULK_ACC_MARKETING_ZONE
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry
783subscribers
-1,001 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003801530995 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BULK_ACC_MARKETING_ZONE |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BULK_ACC_MARKETING_ZONE |
Hacking & security β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 05:39 | 783 | -29 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 812 | -49 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 861 | -285 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 1,146 | -93 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:05 | 1,239 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 1,246 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 1,251 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:59 | 1,253 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 1,257 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 00:51 | 1,258 | -8 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 1,266 | -517 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 1,783 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:49 | 1,784 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 1,784 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
299 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 74 | 24.7% | |
| π₯° | 72 | 24.1% | |
| β€ | 68 | 22.7% | |
| π | 9 | 3.01% | |
| π | 9 | 3.01% | |
| π₯ | 8 | 2.68% | |
| π | 7 | 2.34% | |
| π | 6 | 2.01% | |
| π | 6 | 2.01% | |
| π€― | 6 | 2.01% | |
| π¦ | 5 | 1.67% | |
| π³ | 4 | 1.34% | |
| πΎ | 4 | 1.34% | |
| π | 4 | 1.34% | |
| π± | 4 | 1.34% | |
| π | 3 | 1.00% | |
| π | 3 | 1.00% | |
| π¨ | 3 | 1.00% | |
| β‘ | 2 | 0.669% | |
| π€© | 2 | 0.669% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 299 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
π·7 date fb numbar-anymail cookie riport π·Basic rate=9.50 tk π·Fresh acc riport 99-100% always
β€6π2π₯°2π1π1
π·7 date instagram 2fa riport π·Rate=6 tk π·Riport just 100% live fresh id
π6β€4π₯°3π³1π±1π1
π·6,7 date hotmail 30fr 2fa riport π·Rate=12.50 tk π·Just 100% riport feetback needed
π₯°7π4β€2πΎ1π1
π·5,6 date hotmail 30fr 2fa riport π·Rate=15.50 tk π·Just 100% riport feetback needed
π4π₯°4β€2π³2π1π1
π·6,7 date 6155,56,57X riport π·Rate=8.50 tk π·Fresh acc riport 100% always
π3π₯°3β€2π1π1π¦1
π·5,6 date 1000X riport π·Rate=18 tk π·Fresh acc riport 100% always
β€4π₯°3π2π1πΎ1π¨1π1
π·6 date fb numbar-anymail 2fa riport π·Basic rate=8.50 tk π·Fresh acc riport 99-100% always
π₯°5β€2π1π1π¦1π1
π·6 date instagram 2fa riport π·Rate=6 tk π·Riport just 100% live fresh id
β€9π5π₯°2π₯1π±1
π·5 date fb numbar-anymail 2fa riport π·Basic rate=8.50 tk π·Fresh acc riport 99-100% always
π₯°6π3β€2π1π₯1π¦1π1π1
π·5 date 6155,56,57X riport π·Rate=8.50 tk π·Fresh acc riport 100% always
π5π₯°3π₯2β‘1β€1π1π¦1π1
π·5 date hotmail 0fr 2fa riport π·Rate=12.50 tk π·Just 100% riport feetback needed
π6β€2π₯°2π1π1π€©1π€―1
π·5 date instagram 2fa riport π·Rate=5 tk π·Riport just 100% live fresh id
π8π₯°4β€1π1π1πΎ1π₯1π€―1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BULK_ACC_MARKETING_ZONE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ¨ππ πππ ππ¨π¬ π¦πππ ππ’π‘πβ (@BULK_ACC_MARKETING_ZONE), 783 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BULK_ACC_MARKETING_ZONE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.