Canal informativo de las Fanbases Armys Young Forever y Army Teens de la Revista de Taehyung, formadas por #ARMYs de distintas partes de LATAM que amamos a #BTS y a la cultura coreana. #RM #Namjoon #Jin #Suga #JHope #Jimin #V #Taehyung #Jungkook #Bangtan
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
17 measurements spanning 68 days, net +222. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,738–8,030 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 14:18
7,996
+13
1 Nov 2026, 06:46
7,983
+7
26 Oct 2026, 21:56
7,976
+10
24 Oct 2026, 05:16
7,966
+4
21 Oct 2026, 01:40
7,962
+7
18 Oct 2026, 08:01
7,955
+17
15 Oct 2026, 00:28
7,938
+19
11 Oct 2026, 14:55
7,919
+47
5 Oct 2026, 08:58
7,872
+29
27 Sept 2026, 04:36
7,843
+34
17 Sept 2026, 22:20
7,809
+3
13 Sept 2026, 23:16
7,806
-6
10 Sept 2026, 00:57
7,812
+14
4 Sept 2026, 12:20
7,798
+26
31 Aug 2026, 20:24
7,772
-1
28 Aug 2026, 17:32
7,773
-1
28 Aug 2026, 14:30
7,774
first reading
Engagement
50 posts held, back to 28 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.27%
avg views ÷ 7,996 subscribers
Avg views / post
101
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 50 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 37 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
50 (28 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
3,947
Reactions total
255
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 23:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈87,200
Videos
≈24,200
Links
≈31,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
14m 14s
Average length
1m 01s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
347 reactions across 47 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
250
72.0%
👍
28
8.07%
🥰
28
8.07%
🔥
25
7.20%
👏
5
1.44%
😁
4
1.15%
😍
4
1.15%
💋
2
0.576%
😱
1
0.288%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 347 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (12.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Taste_arih en Instagram:
¡El encuentro entre los sabores tradicionales coreanos y la cocina occidental nunca deja de sorprendernos! 🧈🥢 En este video podemos ver a los chicos de BTS probando y dando su opinión experta sobre las creaciones de Taste Arih, destacando el toque único de la mantequilla de Doenjang y el maní crujiente. ¡Hasta se nota cuánto disfrutan debatiendo sobre los sabores! 😋💜
👇 Traducción de la con…
¡Miren este momento tan tierno! 🥺💜🐶
El perrito Stoney (@stoneybluethedood) compartió este video en Instagram junto a Jimin y dejó el mensaje más lindo:
"¿Mi parte favorita de la gira? Dándole a todos mis amigos amor y besos extra 🥺💜🐾"
🔗👇
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DfVw4SlvEHe/?mdxt=cHJiNWgzeGVubG15
@BTS_ARMY_LATAM
#revistadetaehyung
#armysyoungforever
#armyteensrt
#ComunidadHallyu2026
🐻❄️
Este impresionante mural en honor a Taehyung está ubicado en Daegu, justo alrededor de su vieja escuela media. Está lleno de mensajes dulces y un tributo precioso a su amor por Van Gogh y la música.
¡Es increíble ver cuánto lo aman! 🧸✨
Y por si fuera poco... ¡El propio TAE pasó a dejar su comentario en la publicación diciendo:
"Vaya"! 😭💛
🔗👇
https://www.instagram.com/p/DfXNaRQkiz0/?img_index=7&xtok=MTF6ZnJkdHp…
Una de las personas que estuvieron con Yoongi durante sus días de entrenamiento en el servicio público compartió esta tierna historia sobre él 🥹
"Asistí al mismo curso de entrenamiento en el que participó Suga de BTS durante su servicio público, y honestamente, me sorprendieron sus actitudes. Conversaba con total naturalidad con los chicos de nuestro grupo Y les hacia preguntas como:
"¿Cuáles son los juegos que pref…
🗳️ INFORMACIÓN I VOTACIONES
¡ARMY, ES OFICIAL!
#BTS asistirá a las ceremonias de los premios MMA y a los MAMA
Debemos de asegurar esos premios para ellos, no dejes de lado las votaciones 💜 🙌
¿Ya votaste?
@BTS_ARMY_LATAM
#revistadetaehyung
#armysyoungforever
#armyteensrt
#ComunidadHallyu2025
🔹📈
💫Nueva colaboración 💫
🌎 BTS EN LATINOAMÉRICA: EL PASO YA TERMINÓ, LA HUELLA QUEDÓ
De aquel pequeño encuentro en Brasil en 2014 a los estadios llenos de 2026, BTS y ARMY han construido una historia que va mucho más allá de los escenarios. ✨
🎶 La gira ARIRANG cerró su capítulo latinoamericano, pero lo que BTS y ARMY construyeron juntos permanece. Porque hay huellas que no se borran cuando se apagan las luces.
✍️ De…
EN MAMA "VISA CHOICE" TENEMOS EMERGENCIA!!!!!
¡QUEDAN 3 DÍAS PARA VOTAR! SOLO 3 DÍAS
NO HAY NINGÚN CAMBIO en el ranking en absoluto.
#BTS sigue en el #3 para VISA (Daesang) según el rastreador en #2026MAMAVOTE.
Ese premio 🏆 es importantisimo para BTS 💜
La diferencia es DEMASIADO GRANDE. ¡Necesitamos VOTANTES! POR FAVOR!!!
Difundan el mensaje para que llegue a más ARMYS debemos subir de posición
🗳️Aquí: http…
🏆 VOTACIÓN EN LOS MAMA AWARDS 2da RONDA
ARMY A VOTAR TODOS EN LOS MAMA!!!
👉🏻ESTAMOS A 3 DÍAS DE TERMINAR ESTA VOTACIÓN.
Necesitamos seguir apoyando lo más que puedamos, CADA VOTO CUENTA 🗳️
🔹 VOTA CON TODOS LOS DISPOSITIVOS POSIBLES
Compartan con más ARMYS y llevemos a BTS a la cima SI O SI.
VOTO MASIVO POR BTS EN LOS MAMA
#VoteForBTSonMAMA2026
https://mnetplus.world/event/2026-mama?deeplink=mnetplus%3A%2F%2Fvo…
👍5
Signed Sel Aldana
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @BTS_ARMY_LATAM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@BTS_ARMY_LATAM named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@laneigesg named in 1 post, 4 November 2026 – 4 November 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
✨𝗕𝗔𝗡𝗚𝗧𝗔𝗡𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗦𝗘⁷✨⊙⊝⊜ @BANGTANVERSECANAL · 72,454 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026
BTS NEWS ⟭⟬⁷ @TangerinesOfBTS · 92,567 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 August 2026
BTS CONTENIDO 𖥔 @btscontenidomandarinas · 41,209 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💜 BTS ARMY LATAM 💜” (@BTS_ARMY_LATAM), 7,996 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BTS_ARMY_LATAM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.