Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BTST STBT SPECIAL

Channel

BTST STBT SPECIAL

@BTSTSTBTSPECIAL

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,642subscribers

-780 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002508571386
TypeChannel
Username@BTSTSTBTSPECIAL
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BTSTSTBTSPECIAL

Growth

16,64217,42217,0327 August 2026 — 17,422 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,380 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,302 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,207 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,992 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,929 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,878 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,830 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,809 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,692 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,642 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -780. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,525–17,539 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 23:2616,642-50
16 Aug 2026, 22:2416,692-117
15 Aug 2026, 18:4416,809-21
14 Aug 2026, 06:5416,830-48
13 Aug 2026, 00:4416,878-51
12 Aug 2026, 00:0416,929-63
11 Aug 2026, 01:4616,992-215
9 Aug 2026, 23:3317,207-95
8 Aug 2026, 23:3017,302-78
7 Aug 2026, 22:0817,380-42
7 Aug 2026, 17:1517,422first reading

Engagement

187 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.567%
avg views ÷ 16,642 subscribers
Avg views / post
94.3
185 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.917%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
187
of 187 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 185 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held187 (7 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total17,443
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
266.7%
133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 187 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 187 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC62 viewsread 17 August 2026

𝗕𝗶𝗴 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁 𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗘𝗥 𝗥𝗨𝗡𝗡𝗜𝗡𝗚 💐💐💐❤️❤️💐💐💐 𝗔𝗚𝗔𝗜𝗡 𝗚𝗢𝗢𝗗 𝗝𝗔𝗖𝗞𝗣𝗢𝗧 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗙𝗜𝗧𝗦 𝗧𝗢MORROW 𝗢𝗡 𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗝𝗔𝗖𝗞𝗣𝗢𝗧 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗩𝗜𝗘𝗪𝗦. ✔️ 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗬 𝗜𝗦 𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗠𝗢𝗧𝗧𝗢✌️✌️ ✔️ 𝗤𝗨𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗜𝗦 𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗔𝗜𝗠 ❣️❣️ ✔️ 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗙𝗜𝗧 𝗜𝗦 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗨𝗟𝗧..😍🚀😘 PREMIUM 𝗚𝗥𝗢𝗨𝗣 𝗕𝗘𝗡𝗜𝗙𝗜𝗧𝗦🚀🚀🚀 𝗘𝗔𝗖𝗛 𝗖𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗦 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗣𝗘𝗥 𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗥𝗬 , 𝗘𝗫𝗜𝗧 ,𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗣 𝗟𝗢𝗦𝗦 & 𝗧𝗔𝗥𝗚𝗘𝗧𝗦. **✔️ 𝗟𝗜𝗩𝗘 𝗚𝗨𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 , 𝗙𝗢𝗟𝗟𝗢𝗪 𝗨𝗣 𝗢𝗡 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗙𝗜𝗧 𝗕𝗢𝗢𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚 😍🚀🚀🚀✅✅✅✅💸💰💰** 𝗙𝗥𝗜𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗦𝗦 𝗝𝗢𝗜𝗡 𝗨𝗦 𝗧𝗢𝗗𝗔𝗬 & 𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗡 𝗟𝗜𝗞𝗘 𝗪𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗻 𝗕𝘂𝗳𝗳𝗲𝘁𝘁 😍🚀 𝗦𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗪𝗮𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻

17 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC62 views1 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🔥 WANT TO EARN DAILY CONSISTENT PROFITS? 🔥 Join our PREMIUM TRADING GROUP today and start your journey towards smart & disciplined trading. Get access to: ✅ Daily Sure Shot Signals ✅ Proper Entry & Exit ✅ Risk-Managed Trades ✅ Live Market Guidance Limited Seats • Serious Traders Only 🔗 Join Now: 📩 Ping for Access: @Teamstockidea

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 187 posts we hold for @BTSTSTBTSPECIAL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BTST STBT SPECIAL” (@BTSTSTBTSPECIAL), 16,642 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BTSTSTBTSPECIAL.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.