Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 53 days, net -2,198. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 56,490–59,348 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Sept 2026, 10:20
56,820
-504
18 Sept 2026, 02:39
57,324
-96
15 Sept 2026, 20:15
57,420
-40
14 Sept 2026, 01:21
57,460
-120
12 Sept 2026, 05:36
57,580
-120
9 Sept 2026, 20:35
57,700
-112
6 Sept 2026, 14:01
57,812
-91
4 Sept 2026, 04:41
57,903
-38
2 Sept 2026, 15:49
57,941
-50
1 Sept 2026, 14:13
57,991
-44
31 Aug 2026, 15:48
58,035
-65
30 Aug 2026, 18:13
58,100
-25
29 Aug 2026, 16:56
58,125
-63
28 Aug 2026, 16:57
58,188
-32
27 Aug 2026, 17:44
58,220
-13
26 Aug 2026, 20:25
58,233
-49
25 Aug 2026, 16:57
58,282
-25
24 Aug 2026, 20:17
58,307
-90
23 Aug 2026, 06:14
58,397
-22
21 Aug 2026, 16:38
58,419
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 111 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.40%
avg views ÷ 56,820 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,200
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held
35 (25 June 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total
21,010
Reactions total
696
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Sept 2026, 16:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,010
Videos
≈69
Links
≈856
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
37s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,800 reactions across 35 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🦄
1,415
24.4%
👾
1,399
24.1%
🎉
746
12.9%
👍
742
12.8%
❤
734
12.7%
🔥
690
11.9%
❤🔥
25
0.431%
😁
20
0.345%
😍
17
0.293%
🕊
6
0.103%
👻
4
0.069%
🐳
1
0.017%
🙉
1
0.017%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,800 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Pixelmania от создателей Rolls⛏
10 миллионов пикселей. Под одним из пикселей: 1.000.000 Stars 🌟
А ещё по карте спрятаны подарки🎁
Первый пиксель — бесплатно. И ещё по одному за каждого приглашённого друга.
Можете открыть несколько бесплатных пикселей, вдруг вам повезет.
Beluga Club - место, где результат зависит от тебя.
Хватит крутить, пора играть.
В казино ты нажимаешь кнопку и надеешься на удачу.
В покере всё иначе: читаешь соперников, считаешь риски, выбираешь момент и принимаешь решение сам.
Beluga Club - покер-клуб для тех, кто любит контролировать игру, а не просто надеяться на результат.
🔥 Уже завтра 18.09 - Freeroll с гарантированным призовым фондом $300
💵 +20% к перво…
🫡 Telegram начал предупреждать перед отправкой подарков на маркеты
Теперь при попытке отправить подарок на Portals, MRKT, GetGems или Tonnel появляется системное сообщение от самого Telegram.
Похоже, это ответ на волну скама с фейковым саппортом маркетов - жертвами таких схем становились даже владельцы Кубков от олимпиадников.
💭 Призёры кубков в опасности
На данный момент известно как минимум о 4 украденных кубках. Среди известных случаев:
#9 — украден через фейковый Binance Market.
#52 и #61 — один через фейковую поддержку, второй через поддельный USDT.
#80 — владелец перешёл по ссылке от фейковой поддержки и внёс подарок в MRKT.
🎁 Scared Cat - рекорд цены!
🤑 Впервые минимальная цена в коллекции Scared Cat преодолела отметку в $300
🤯 При стартовой стоимости котов в $0,7 это минимум 400x, или +39 900% на абсолютно любого кота
Китайский кит случайно отдал Plush Pepe #583 боту, который спамит дешевые оферы всего за 125 звезд (~$2)💅
Человек, который забрал по лоу Пепе: @aneew
Поделился инфой, что забирал таким образом еще 2-3 дорогих NFT
Нами манипулируют, нас укатывают - и мы всё равно ждём крипто чудо.
В текущей геополитике и новостной сводке пока что тяжело предположить, когда начнется альтсезон.
В это время как альтернативу можно рассмотреть рынок, который существует в любом мировом положении, а текущие новости лишь добавляют волатильности.
Речь про рынок металлов и валют — классический Форекс.
Нет, не кухонная история из 2000-х, а рынок реал…
🚀 Размещайте рекламу в Telegram без долгих переписок.
Выберите канал, сразу увидите цену и забронируйте размещение через Adpact.
🤖 @AdpactBot
🌐 https://adpact.app/ru/
#ad_Q1PG64PA
💬 В бета-версии Telegram тестируют новую функцию — комментарии к NFT-подаркам.
Теперь к подарку можно будет добавить отдельный комментарий, который будет отображаться вместе с самим NFT.
Вышли новые кубки 🏆
🇺🇿Telegram отправил их победителям IOI 2026
У этих кубков так же отсутствуют неудачные фоны, а самым частым фоном сделали Black - 15% шанс
🏆🏆 + 2 кубка
Вчера были улучшены два Intelligence Cup — один из них оказался на чёрном фоне.
— Intelligence Cup #48
— Intelligence Cup #135
При этом ники владельцев кубков скрыты. Вероятно, это сделано специально, чтобы победителей олимпиады не начали массово деанонить с целью кражи кубков.
🦄41👾40🔥26👍24🎉23❤18
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @BTCMAKERR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BTC MAKER” (@BTCMAKERR), 56,820 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BTCMAKERR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.