Channel
@BTB88668
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,030subscribers
-30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002313687766 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BTB88668 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BTB88668 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 2,030 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 2,036 | -12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 2,048 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 2,059 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 2,060 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 15 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (15 April 2025 – 26 July 2026) |
| Views total | — |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2,332 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 614 | 26.3% | |
| 🔥 | 601 | 25.8% | |
| 😁 | 556 | 23.8% | |
| 🎉 | 550 | 23.6% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 0.214% | |
| 🗿 | 4 | 0.172% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.043% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.043% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,332reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2025 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 30 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
免费策略买入INIT盈利中，涨幅约6% 昨天晚上$0.803买入，目前价格是$0.852，盈利持有中。 INIT在后半夜小幅下跌，满足了小级别的回调需求，现在价格重新站上关键均线，有可能突破新高获得更大利润。 不过，也要提防今早的上涨只是为了回补缺口，所以偏保守的可以选择分批离场，以确保利润。
👍50🔥45😁42🎉38
小币种财富密码（INIT） 操作建议 现价$0.803可买入小仓位，当现货持有，更稳健的操作是等待下文的短线位置再进场。 短线参考 0.722做多，0.652止损，0.815止盈。
😁50🔥46🎉38👍36
跟单账户收益更新 初始总资金为1000U，上一周盈利710U。账户持续低杠杆复利，虽然胜率较低，但通过很好的盈亏比做出了利润，吃到了上一周大盘的回暖。 晚些时候，继续更新小币种免费策略。不过免费策略仅作体验，币安大平台跟单躺赚收益，为您省去盯盘时间。 联系助理开通跟单，一对一服务：@annabtc8
👍50😁46🔥43🎉40
小币种财富密码（MYRO） 操作建议 现价$0.02913可买入小仓位，当现货持有，更稳健的操作是等待下文的短线位置再进场。 短线参考 0.0255做多，0.0224止损，0.0296止盈。
🔥47😁45👍39🎉37
还是一天收益率又涨了一倍 目前交易第18天，收益率300%，门槛提升至2500U，不求多少人跟，只是自己做一个交易记录 跟单带资金咨询助理： @annabtc8
🎉56🔥56😁47👍45
交易员目前运行18天 目前收益率220% 门槛提升至2000U，从来不搞一些虚的，实盘是最好的证明 跟单获取邀请码咨询小助理： @annabtc8
🔥67👍65😁61🎉57😐1
【鼎盛社区】每日实盘策略🚀 pinned «想跟单1500U以上，币安私欲跟单联系助理要邀请码 @annabtc8 交易员本是想着记录自己牛市交易，想跟无需废话准备好资金即可 每增加一倍门槛多500U»
想跟单1500U以上，币安私欲跟单联系助理要邀请码 @annabtc8 交易员本是想着记录自己牛市交易，想跟无需废话准备好资金即可 每增加一倍门槛多500U
🎉46👍43😁41🔥39
带单账户1000u本金，这个月赚了一万三。胜率看起来低，但为什么盈利这么多？ 今天凌晨抓住机会，13分钟在TRUMP上赚了620u。四月快结束了，目前的月收益率已经来到了187%。 交易是一座桥，有很多种方式可以抵达对岸，但大多数拿到结果的人物，都是通过“高盈亏比”的方式。“万倍退网”的浪浪如今功成身退，当初他的胜率可能也就40%～50%，但一次收益就可以覆盖10次亏损。 从我的仓位记录来看，止损亏40u、60u，但赚一次就是620u，这就是所谓高盈亏比。 但很多人喜欢高胜率的稳定收益，例如著名的“马丁策略”，亏了就一直补仓直到出现利润。这个策略收益很稳定，毕竟99%的时间是震荡行情，但只要碰上1%的单边行情，就会一次亏完。这是高胜率的弊端，要知道“稳定”和“暴利”永远是一个对立面。 需要跟单联系社群小助理，一对一服务：@annabtc8
👍49🔥44🎉39😁36
NKN买入策略获利，单日涨幅145%，来自会员盈利反馈。 19号凌晨我们买进NKN，今天行情启动，24h涨幅145%。 近几天没有发小币种免费策略，晚些时候如果市场出现机会，我们会继续分享给大家。
👍50🔥43🎉38😁34🗿4🐳1
免费策略做多wct，六分钟涨幅7% 手快的兄弟有福了，上一篇免费策略提醒做多wct，当时价格为0.434，不到十分钟价格升至0.473，最高涨幅约7%。 我们预设的止损为8%跌幅，所以涨幅7%时可以获利了结一部分仓位。当然，如果手慢了，也可以继续持有，让利润飞！
👍50😁48🔥42🎉32
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @BTB88668. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 500,597 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“【鼎盛社区】每日实盘策略🚀” (@BTB88668), 2,030 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BTB88668.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.