The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

Channel
2004.com
@BRATANI888
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,016subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001971106645 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BRATANI888 |
| Created | 15 July 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BRATANI888 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 1,016 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 1,017 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 1,017 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 22 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
5,108 reactions across 12 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🕊 | 1,359 | 26.6% | |
| ☃ | 1,171 | 22.9% | |
| 👻 | 452 | 8.85% | |
| 🍓 | 368 | 7.20% | |
| custom 5285358244464699846 | 295 | 5.78% | |
| custom 5238096974095333448 | 286 | 5.60% | |
| ⚡ | 228 | 4.46% | |
| 🌚 | 228 | 4.46% | |
| custom 5438651708932641550 | 208 | 4.07% | |
| 👀 | 162 | 3.17% | |
| custom 5460917751403003972 | 91 | 1.78% | |
| ❤ | 75 | 1.47% | |
| 🎄 | 66 | 1.29% | |
| 💋 | 58 | 1.14% | |
| ❤🔥 | 24 | 0.47% | |
| 🍾 | 14 | 0.274% | |
| 🙏 | 13 | 0.255% | |
| 🌭 | 8 | 0.157% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.039% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2024 to 24 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
токабока в честь безде яуже 8 лет в фандоме :D #фан #рис
🕊458☃133👀92👻28🌚24
Signed ଓсашк3да ♱
мне сегодн 17 я стала на один год ближе к инсульту и деменции so буду рада репост мои рисунки subscribe to my channel ну и всё ещё можн добавить мне на новые тапочки :-) 2202206350490509
☃301🕊76🌚56👻36👀16
Signed ଓсашк3да ♱
2004.cоm сделала вам tea 🕊-выпить ☃️-быть казнённым #рис #bro
🕊359☃117custom 546091775140300397266👀14🌚10👻6
Signed ଓсашк3да ♱
памятка для незнающих от сашикеды
🕊234🌚57☃31👀16custom 546091775140300397211🎄4👻3
Signed ଓсашк3да ♱
yuna fr мас 🌟 #рис #фан
👻277☃60🕊50🌚17custom 54609177514030039728🎄7👀5
Signed ଓсашк3да ♱
1973au #рис #фан
☃261👻74🎄46🕊17👀9custom 54609177514030039726🌚5
Signed ଓсашк3да ♱
ロマンス 🦋 #конченные #рис
custom 5238096974095333448286🕊57☃44🌚18👀5👻3
Signed ଓсашк3да ♱
моя сона принцесса дветыщечетыре🦋 #рис #bro
custom 5285358244464699846295🕊46🌚41👻17☃5👀5
Signed ଓсашк3да ♱
HOLIDAAAYS #рис #конченные
custom 5438651708932641550200❤62🍓47❤🔥14☃11💋5🙏4⚡2
Signed ଓсашк3да ♱
саночка #рис #фан
☃179💋46🍓40🕊22❤11custom 54386517089326415505👻4❤🔥3
Signed ଓсашк3да ♱
рекв 2 #рис
⚡193🍓60☃29🎄9🙏5❤🔥3🌭3🍾3
Signed ଓсашк3да ♱
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @BRATANI888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@BRATANI888 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“2004.com” (@BRATANI888), 1,016 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BRATANI888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.