Channel
@BOT_Analyse
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
4subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001332807613 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BOT_Analyse |
| Created | 9 October 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BOT_Analyse |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 4 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:30 | 5 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 5 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 October 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 October 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Bei diesem Kanal nicht annehmen, dass der fortlaufen Posts bekommt, denn alle Inhalte erfahrt ihr erst in schon bestehenden weiteren 40 Kanälen über Beitritt und Suche im oben aufgeführten >> Inmhaltsverzeichnis << Die erste Seite soll wenig Inhalt tragen, damit sie auch gelesen wird.
Welche BOTS nutzt du in deinen Gruppen als Admin? Achtung Mehrfachauswahl! (kommen hier BOTs hinzu, starten wir die Umfrage später noch mal neu) - https://t.me/BOT_Analyse
The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
.
.
.
Scrolle durch diesen Link nach oben zum Anfang: https://t.me/BOT_Analyse/1
🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸 Wer mehr aus unseren vielen Testst und Aufzeichnungen wissen möchte, schaut bitte in unser großes Inhaltsverzeichnis: https://t.me/joinchat/hQI8ebAQBTYyZWM0 Dies wird regelmäßig erweitert, weil massiv Gruppen mit Themen hinzukommen werden. 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸
.
Bei uns kann man erlernen, wie man einen solchen fertigen BOT bei sich in der Gruppe einrichtet, also ein kleiner Lehrgang Dazu im Inhaltsverzeichnis nachsehen.
Wir werden Umfragen starten und BOTs gegeneinander vergleichen und von Euch vergleichen und kommentieren lassen, dass jeder seinen Kommentar dazu abgeben soll und kann, um so die jeweiligen BOTs besser analysieren zu können. Die Information jedes einzelnen hilft also allen. Trotz dass BOTs zwar nur von Admins der Gruppen bedient werden können, ist es auch für das Mitglied hier interessant, weil es seinem Admin Tipps…
.
.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BOT_Analyse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Welche BOTS nutzt du in deinen Gruppen als Admin? Achtung Mehrfachauswahl! (kommen hier BOTs hinzu, starten wir die Umfrage später noch mal neu) - https://t.me/BOT_Analyse
The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2021 to 26 October 2021. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BOT_Analyse” (@BOT_Analyse), 4 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BOT_Analyse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.