Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BNBTiger official Announcements

Channel

BNBTiger official Announcements

@BNBTigerInu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,575subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001827027950
TypeChannel
Username@BNBTigerInu
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BNBTigerInu

Growth

3,5733,5793,5767 August 2026 — 3,579 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,579 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,576 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,575 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,573 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,575 subscribers3,5757 August 202617 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,572–3,580 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 09:243,575+2
13 Aug 2026, 10:383,573-2
10 Aug 2026, 17:313,575-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:583,576-3
7 Aug 2026, 09:153,579no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:033,579first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.3%
avg views ÷ 3,575 subscribers
Avg views / post
763
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held20 (25 October 202521 July 2026)
Views total1,526
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

562 reactions across 14 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥22039.1%
21538.3%
👍407.12%
💩274.80%
👎183.20%
❤‍🔥91.60%
👏91.60%
40.712%
🏆40.712%
🍾30.534%
🎉20.356%
😁20.356%
🤡20.356%
🥴20.356%
10.178%
🌭10.178%
🎃10.178%
🥰10.178%
🥱10.178%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 562reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 October 2025 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 03:40 UTC914 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Dear BNBTigerArmy LP The lock date has been updated to: September 1st, 2029 Please check: https://bscscan.com/tx/0xfff2a98bb87f53c01275d6c71ffb0daa69f92bdbe286865c8e5a13a611c4862b#eventlog ❗️❗️❗️ Please note ⚠️, Administrators will never privately chat with you, any private chat is a scam. Any news or activity will be announced 📣, Do not be deceived!

🔥153👍1

20 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC612 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The administrator will never chat privately! All private conversations are scams! BNBTiger🐅CA: 0xF8584516b7d2c156C763C874d6813E06b57e4cB5 website: http://bnbtiger.top twitter: https://x.com/BnbTigerInu 中文群组: @BNBTigerChinese

👍5

4 Jun 2026, 17:37 UTC≈1,700 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

BNBTiger! Fierce.Firm.Victory BNBTiger is the king of beasts. They are the symbol of victory and strength. Powerful and tough.and our $BNBTIGER community is the same. For those who are looking for new gems, this is a new opportunity. Born out of trials and tribulation, the $BNBTIGER community is the strongest community youll find, Here, we are supportive of one another, and pushing each other towards success. CA:

🔥196👍3👏3

4 Jun 2026, 17:02 UTC≈1,370 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔥🐅 MISSION ACCOMPLISHED: $20,000 WORTH OF BNBTIGER TOKENS BURNED! 🐅🔥 As promised, the BNBTiger Team has successfully executed a massive token burn worth $20,000, permanently removing a significant amount of $BNBTIGER from circulation. Send 6,383,000,000,000,000 BNBTiger tokens to Black Hole This isn’t just a burn it’s a statement. A statement that BNBTiger honors its commitments. A statement that scarcity matte

🔥138

30 May 2026, 18:18 UTC≈1,440 views61 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚨 BNBTiger Token Burn Announcement 🔥 The BNBTiger team remains dedicated to establishing a robust, transparent, and value-oriented ecosystem. Consistent with our strategic roadmap, we are pleased to announce an upcoming token burn event scheduled for June 4, 2026, occurring precisely five days from the current date. This strategic initiative will: • Reduce the overall token supply • Enhance scarcity and long-term

🔥2723🏆4👍3👏3🥱1

28 Feb 2026, 11:14 UTC≈2,510 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Dear BNBTiger Family, We want to inform you that BNBTiger has been delisted from MEXC Exchange. While we could have taken steps to prevent this, our Dev made the conscious decision to allow the delisting. The reason is simple: MEXC has not brought any real benefit to our project or community. ⚠️ Important Action Required: All holders are strongly advised to withdraw their BNBTiger tokens from MEXC immediately. Pleas

24👍12👎8💩3🤡2

5 Feb 2026, 14:10 UTC≈3,310 views61 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Dear BNBTigerArmy! Just now, In order to promote the growth of BNBTiger team burn🔥 6,000,000,000,000,000 $BNBTIGER ($11000) CA: 0xf8584516b7d2c156c763c874d6813e06b57e4cb5 🔥CMC & CG 📊 BitMart & MEXC 🔒Liq 🐅22.98K HOLDERS 🛡️Audit #BNBTIGER Fierce.Firm.Victory Transaction Hash: 0x18d68603bd6c2f7d3f69685bfd9d2fb9949273971d1ad252d695ea98a7ed561f https://x.com/bnbtigerinu/status/2019413017591722192?s=46

🔥3813👎8💩2

27 Jan 2026, 19:22 UTC≈2,920 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

BNBTiger Token Burn🔥: First Round of 2026 We announce that BNBTiger token destruction will be held on February 5, 2026, as part of our ongoing commitment to transparency, disciplined token management, and long-term value creation for our holders. This burn will permanently remove tokens from circulation, reducing total supply and reinforcing scarcity the BNBTiger and the value of BNBTiger This scheduled burn marks

26🔥16👍4💩4🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BNBTigerInu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 889,219 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Anúncios Baby Doge
@BabyDogeAnnPT · 90,405
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BNBTiger official Announcements” (@BNBTigerInu), 3,575 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BNBTigerInu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.