Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 西安宝可梦对战报告

Channel

西安宝可梦对战报告

@BKMCP_029

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,253subscribers

+12,067 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003520320741
TypeChannel
Username@BKMCP_029
Description🎙 【西安宝可梦对战报告显示】 最硬核的实测报告发布地。拒绝滤镜,只要真实。 🎞 战斗视频 / 📸 验证实拍 / 📝 深度长评
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held46
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/BKMCP_029

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

1,18613,2537,219.57 August 2026 — 1,186 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,186 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,187 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,214 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,067 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,063 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,065 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,062 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,059 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,091 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,081 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,090 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,088 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,109 subscribers18 September 2026 — 3,817 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,199 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,018 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,723 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,229 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,574 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,745 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,924 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,276 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,467 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,632 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,607 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,591 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,587 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,583 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,566 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,542 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,536 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,497 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,474 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,424 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,368 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,346 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,303 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,281 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,265 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,242 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,211 subscribers8 November 2026 — 11,551 subscribers9 November 2026 — 11,891 subscribers11 November 2026 — 12,397 subscribers14 November 2026 — 13,253 subscribers7 August 202614 November 2026
46 measurements spanning 99 days, net +12,067. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 46
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 17:0513,253+856
11 Nov 2026, 14:2012,397+506
9 Nov 2026, 21:1511,891+340
8 Nov 2026, 09:4911,551+340
7 Nov 2026, 06:1011,211-31
6 Nov 2026, 02:5011,242-23
5 Nov 2026, 02:1711,265-16
4 Nov 2026, 01:5811,281-22
3 Nov 2026, 05:1811,303-43
2 Nov 2026, 03:0911,346-22
1 Nov 2026, 05:2111,368-56
31 Oct 2026, 01:4911,424-50
30 Oct 2026, 02:1011,474-23
29 Oct 2026, 05:4011,497-39
28 Oct 2026, 03:2911,536-6
27 Oct 2026, 04:5711,542-24
26 Oct 2026, 04:3711,566-17
25 Oct 2026, 03:4911,583-4
24 Oct 2026, 06:2811,587-4
23 Oct 2026, 06:3111,591first reading

Engagement

193 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.44%
avg views ÷ 13,253 subscribers
Avg views / post
987
173 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.056%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
173
of 193 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 173 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held193 (6 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total170,665
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 21:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,560
Videos
≈16
Links
≈2,280

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤9100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 193 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 193 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 173 posts held from the last 30 days (0.578%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 17:49 UTC978 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⚔ 宝可梦训练家对战报告 ⚔ 【👾 宝可梦代号】:丁丁猫 【🎰 综合表现得分】:7.42 【💰 性价比得分】:7 【人照】:7 【颜值】:7.5 【身材】:7 【态度】:8 【对战过程】:这次去的课室位于南稍门地铁站附近的一个小区里,地理位置还是挺不错的,坐地铁过去很方便,出站之后不用走太远就能到。小区环境比较安静,私密性也还可以。课室内部收拾得比较整洁,整体干净卫生,没有什么乱七八糟的东西,进去之后感觉比较舒服,不会让人觉得拘束。 老师属于姨姨,身材能够看出一些岁月留下的痕迹,不过整体气质还是比较温婉的,属于比较有生活阅历的成熟类型。老师说话声音很温柔,语气轻声细语,性格也很好,交流起来没有什么距离感。整个过程中都比较主动,也很会照顾情绪。 这次约的是PP。刚开始见面的时候,老师的态度就很热情,没有那种敷衍应付的感觉。简单交流之后,整个氛围逐渐放松下来。老师在互动过程中比较细心,会主动关注体验和感受,节奏把握得也不错,开…

14 Nov 2026, 15:30 UTC854 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⚔ 宝可梦训练家对战报告 ⚔ 【👾 宝可梦代号】:小晚 【🎰 综合表现得分】:10 【💰 性价比得分】:9 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【态度】:10 【对战过程】:小姐姐给的感觉挺好的,个人很推荐 【推荐|一般|拉胯】:👍 好评 【👤 训练家留名】:匿名 【🪖 工兵车评】:豆 🔋 本车评由西安宝可梦 @BKM_029 审核通过❗

14 Nov 2026, 14:47 UTC833 viewsread 14 November 2026

⚔ 宝可梦训练家对战报告 ⚔ 【👾 宝可梦代号】:小猪萌萌 【🎰 综合表现得分】:9.17 【💰 性价比得分】:10 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9.5 【身材】:8.5 【态度】:10 【对战过程】:老师真人比照片要漂亮,进屋陪洗,然后老师带着我选喜欢的衣服,躺床上就是大蟒蛇起手,口活时间很长,全程很舒适,中间休息老师会跟你分享很多有趣的事情,很健谈,全程不催,这个价位还要什么自行车 【推荐|一般|拉胯】:👍 好评 【👤 训练家留名】:匿名 【🪖 工兵车评】:否 🔋 本车评由西安宝可梦 @BKM_029 审核通过❗

14 Nov 2026, 13:36 UTC948 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⚔ 宝可梦训练家对战报告 ⚔ 【👾 宝可梦代号】:师太 【🎰 综合表现得分】:9.67 【💰 性价比得分】:10 【人照】:9.5 【颜值】:9.5 【身材】:10 【态度】:10 【对战过程】:约课顺利,准时到达妹妹的开课地,提前留门,妹妹跟图片差距不大,而且胸很大,身材不错,立马上手,手感不错,可以出击 【推荐|一般|拉胯】:👍 好评 【👤 训练家留名】:cf cfcf 【🪖 工兵车评】:否 🔋 本车评由西安宝可梦 @BKM_029 审核通过❗

14 Nov 2026, 13:35 UTC603 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⚔ 宝可梦训练家对战报告 ⚔ 【👾 宝可梦代号】:多米 【🎰 综合表现得分】:8 【💰 性价比得分】:8 【人照】:7 【颜值】:7 【身材】:7.5 【态度】:9 【对战过程】:老师在大兴新区开课,居民楼,遥控上楼。进门感觉老师163左右,人比较胖,🐻也很大,年龄感觉25左右。然后特别的热情。洗澡是老师全自动的,还来个水中萧。 床上服务,课表内容应有尽有,一对巨乳晃来晃去的,正反面舔来舔去的,特别是毒龙,感觉舌头插进了菊花里面,舔会阴,吸蛋蛋都有。口活也是一级棒,轻舔龟头,整根含入,舌尖舔这马眼。做的时候也是很配合,只要你有要求,都会配合。唯一,也是最大的缺点就是胖,其它都很好 【推荐|一般|拉胯】:👍 好评 【👤 训练家留名】:匿名 【🪖 工兵车评】:是 🔋 本车评由西安宝可梦 @BKM_029 审核通过❗

14 Nov 2026, 13:35 UTC696 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⚔ 宝可梦训练家对战报告 ⚔ 【👾 宝可梦代号】:多米 【🎰 综合表现得分】:8.25 【💰 性价比得分】:7.5 【人照】:7.5 【颜值】:7.5 【身材】:7 【态度】:9.5 【对战过程】:老师在大兴新区开课,居民楼,遥控上楼。进门感觉老师163左右,人比较胖,🐻也很大,年龄感觉25左右。然后特别的热情。洗澡是老师全自动的,还来个水中萧。 床上服务,课表内容应有尽有,一对巨乳晃来晃去的,正反面舔来舔去的,特别是毒龙,感觉舌头插进了菊花里面,舔会阴,吸蛋蛋都有。口活也是一级棒,轻舔龟头,整根含入,舌尖舔这马眼。做的时候也是很配合,只要你有要求,都会配合。唯一,也是最大的缺点就是胖,其它都很好 【推荐|一般|拉胯】:👍 好评 【👤 训练家留名】:匿名 【🪖 工兵车评】:是 🔋 本车评由西安宝可梦 @BKM_029 审核通过❗

14 Nov 2026, 13:32 UTC867 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⚔ 宝可梦训练家对战报告 ⚔ 【👾 宝可梦代号】:幸运草 【🎰 综合表现得分】:7.67 【💰 性价比得分】:7.5 【人照】:8 【颜值】:8 【身材】:7 【态度】:7.5 【对战过程】:下午刚好有点空,就联系老师过去,进门老师热情接待,闲聊两句就洗澡,老师长相还行,身材一般,有点小肚子,洗澡上床后老师开始服务,老师口感不错,没有齿感,口了会有感觉就传教士进去,进去又紧又热,导致我一会就出了货,完事了就休息了会洗澡走人。这次出击整体感觉一般,一是我状态也不好,再个感觉老师话也不多,有点冷场,整体评价一般较好。 【推荐|一般|拉胯】:👍 好评 【👤 训练家留名】:匿名 【🪖 工兵车评】:是 🔋 本车评由西安宝可梦 @BKM_029 审核通过❗

14 Nov 2026, 13:31 UTC689 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⚔ 宝可梦训练家对战报告 ⚔ 【👾 宝可梦代号】:小猪萌萌 【🎰 综合表现得分】:10 【💰 性价比得分】:10 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【态度】:10 【对战过程】:第一次和老师交流,一开始有点紧张,不过随着老师温柔的抚慰很快就放松下来。老师的舌功非常了得,既绵软又能转得飞快,非常舒服。满分!喜欢。 【推荐|一般|拉胯】:👍 好评 【👤 训练家留名】:amber 【🪖 工兵车评】:否 🔋 本车评由西安宝可梦 @BKM_029 审核通过❗

14 Nov 2026, 11:15 UTC≈3,750 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⚔ 宝可梦训练家对战报告 ⚔ 【👾 宝可梦代号】:上上 【🎰 综合表现得分】:8.67 【💰 性价比得分】:8.5 【人照】:9 【颜值】:8 【身材】:9 【态度】:9 【对战过程】:⭐️工兵出击 ⭐️先天硬件:照片即本人,没有美颜痕迹,真的人照一致,短发御姐,气质干净利落,身高165左右,身材匀称,皮肤黄白皮,触感光滑绵密,🐻B+左右吧,很柔软真熊无疑了,户型小蝴蝶+人工白虎,不过最近长出来不少了,小腿一处小纹身没整体不影响,。进门穿搭:绿色针织抹胸包臀裙,欲感十足。 ⭐️后天软件:态度挺好,配合度高,懂男人会附和,🐍吻配合,虽然🐍吻是我主动提出来的,但是妹子喝完漱口水很配合,最后我主动叫停,有口有69,口还可以,正常水平,69没试,无陪洗,这个确实自助洗浴,有KB,🏠是一室两厅两卫吧,有一次性浴巾和一次性床单,有漱口水。 ⭐️过程: 提前约好,遥控指挥进入,没有罚站,很温柔的接待语气,妹子去放水,脱衣服,准备好一次…

14 Nov 2026, 11:15 UTC789 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⚔ 宝可梦训练家对战报告 ⚔ 【👾 宝可梦代号】:上上 【🎰 综合表现得分】:9 【💰 性价比得分】:7.5 【人照】:9 【颜值】:8 【身材】:9 【态度】:10 【对战过程】:感谢宝可梦给的工兵机会。 提前了半小时到达,刚好老师也结束了上一课,立马上楼,在小区里面,安全性很高。进门就能看到美女,身高165,穿着裙子,特别显身材,人照基本一致,加了美颜磨皮,可以认出本人。无陪洗,洗完上床,先抱着亲亲开始,老师哥哥哥哥的不停,声音酥酥的,耳朵完全受不了,感觉开始舌吻。妹妹一边服务,一边说话,刺激很强烈。 口赢了之后带套进入,很顺利就进去了,一边干妹妹一边叫,刺激强烈的不得了,没等到换姿势,就已经被秒了。结束之后还有时间,妹妹帮我按摩了一会儿,随后穿戴衣服撤退。 整个过程很配合,服务也用心,声音刺激太强烈。 总结下:妹子江苏人,标准南方甜妹,皮肤很白,声音好听,不抽烟,人特别温柔。很会聊天,需要情绪价值的,强烈推荐 【推荐|一…

14 Nov 2026, 11:15 UTC999 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⚔ 宝可梦训练家对战报告 ⚔ 【👾 宝可梦代号】:上上 【🎰 综合表现得分】:8.17 【💰 性价比得分】:8.5 【人照】:8 【颜值】:8 【身材】:9 【态度】:8 【对战过程】:感谢宝可梦工兵 主要是短发御姐俩个词引起了出击的心,先问了老师地方在哪,随即约好时间 老师地方不算偏辟,小区好找是个老小区,一进门看见了老师算是素颜一些比写的年龄大了些,身材白瘦白瘦的,听声音好像就是像是南方的妹子,老师说自己洗过没来陪洗,以为穿了衣服,我也没有强求,我问老师课表有写陪洗,她说是闺蜜写的,刚来西安,问老师说之前没有做过这行,所以我就不看那个课表上的内容,做的时候老师把窗帘拉上,然后把床头的这个猪肉灯打开,其实不是很喜欢这个颜色有点丑,房子环境还可以,就是床头的这个夜灯很难评。后面到了正题跟老师简单的亲亲,摸摸有一说一皮肤真的很不错,白又滑,简单🐍了会,开始给老师亲亲老师说她耳朵很敏感确实让人兽性十足,然后一顿玩了一会,让老师a面…

14 Nov 2026, 05:54 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 14 November 2026

⚔ 宝可梦训练家对战报告 ⚔ 【👾 宝可梦代号】:雨萱 【🎰 综合表现得分】:8.92 【💰 性价比得分】:8 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9.5 【身材】:9.5 【态度】:8.5 【对战过程】:感谢宝可梦~~感谢兄弟转让的工兵~先说硬件,雨萱妆容精致,没有瑕疵,嘴角微弯显得俏皮可爱。胸部有科技,但是乳头很挺,胸型很好看。小穴小白虎,小小的,看着很粉。皮肤紧致,体脂率很低,有脐钉~整体线条流畅~苗条~尺度方面,课表上明确了,不舌,不69。实际上肩部以上,都不能亲,雨萱怕痒说会笑场。老师还有些情趣战袍,可以加点攻速buff。 前戏部分,常规陪洗,水中箫挺舒服。擦干上床,就正面指划亲胸,然后口。口的时候会一边口一边分开腿,跨在你身上,展示美腿和粉嫩小穴。不能69,只能看看摸摸,摸出水。挺诱惑。 正戏部分,男上起手,常规抽插,亲吻胸部。雨萱伴随着淫语,说要夹我,可以感受到小穴缩紧开始夹。我😏,开始加速抽插…

Showing the 12 most recent of 193 posts we hold for @BKMCP_029. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“西安宝可梦对战报告” (@BKMCP_029), 13,253 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BKMCP_029.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.