오늘 타점 기준 3천불 상승이 다이렉트로 나오네요 이번꺼 중요하다고 말씀드렸는데 다들 축하드립니다 안전장치랑 확정수익까지 만들어놔서 이제 편하게 지켜보겠습니다 공개방에서도 영상에서도 투자의정석도 코미남 구독자님들 모두 축하드립니다
❤210

Channel
@BIT_DTR
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14,134subscribers
-512 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001864874268 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BIT_DTR |
| Description | 차트 공부가 목적으로써 거래대상·시점·가액에 대한 추천이나 권유가 아닌 개인적인 의견이니 "참고"만 해주시기 바랍니다. 모든 선택과 책임은 “본인”에게 있습니다. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BIT_DTR |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:36 | 14,134 | -13 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:08 | 14,147 | -6 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:55 | 14,153 | -5 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:46 | 14,158 | -13 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 15:10 | 14,171 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:35 | 14,177 | -17 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:59 | 14,194 | -11 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 15:16 | 14,205 | -5 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 17:44 | 14,210 | +6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:31 | 14,204 | +1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:39 | 14,203 | -8 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:31 | 14,211 | -11 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:46 | 14,222 | -8 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:29 | 14,230 | -11 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 12:55 | 14,241 | -13 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:39 | 14,254 | -2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 10:17 | 14,256 | -16 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 10:36 | 14,272 | -22 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 12:40 | 14,294 | -7 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 14:10 | 14,301 | first reading |
62 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 62 (28 July 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 114,250 |
| Reactions total | 4,303 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 05:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
12,064 reactions across 62 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12,064 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,064 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (4.76%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
오늘 타점 기준 3천불 상승이 다이렉트로 나오네요 이번꺼 중요하다고 말씀드렸는데 다들 축하드립니다 안전장치랑 확정수익까지 만들어놔서 이제 편하게 지켜보겠습니다 공개방에서도 영상에서도 투자의정석도 코미남 구독자님들 모두 축하드립니다
❤210
#비트코인 매수를 받겠다고 선언한 레인지 구간에서는 반응이 계속 나오고있습니다. 전체채널에서도 말씀드렸고 투자의정석에서는 실제로 진입하였습니다. 최근 4개월간 이래도되나 싶을정도로 타점도 승률도 모두 최상의 컨디션을 유지하고있습니다. 앞으로의 관점도 모두 오픈한것처럼 저는 롱포지션 위주로 매매를 할것이고 많이먹든,적게먹든 돈을 잃지않고 수익을 보는거에만 집중하도록 하겠습니다. 영상에서도 채널에서도 공개한것처럼 관점대로 잘 따라가주어서 다행이네요
❤214
#비트코인 직전영상과 관점은 동일합니다. 618라인인 69k가 터지기 직전까지는 계속 상승관점으로 시장을 바라볼 생각이며 내려올때마다 포지션 또한 롱 포지션 위주로만 매매할 생각입니다. 조정중에 반대포지션인 롱을 오픈한다는건 다음추세를 크게 먹기위한 전략이며 손절 기준 또한 명확하게 세우두고 매매할 생각입니다. 우선 1차 구간에서 비비적 거리고있는데 계속 추적하면서 체크하도록 하겠습니다.
❤209
영상 업로드 했습니다. 기다린 타점이 와서 또 한번 승리로 매매를 진행하고있는데 앞으로 어떻게 진행할것인지 관점 폐기라인은 어디인지 영상에 남겨뒀습니다 https://youtu.be/0OiWlqIcF7U?si=W4jPNfR1IxGx5TRu
❤189
자.. 연전연승하고있는데 오늘 영상으로 브리핑 드리도록 하겠습니다. 기대해주세요
❤200
#비트코인 네 이번 매매도 승리하였습니다. 다만 궁극적인 목적은 이번 조정파동의 저점을 잘 잡아서 다음 추세로 연결시키는거기때문에 해당 매매에 집중할 생각입니다. 유튜브 영상올릴때마다 댓글 억까가 많은데 과거에 손절나간걸 지금까지 우려먹고있습니다. 과거에 묶여살지않고 앞으로 나아가야한다고 생각합니다. 126K에서 하락장시작할때 손절 크게 나간것도 사실이지만 그거 멘징한지 한참되었습니다. 또 제가 연전연승중이니 인증하라 이런 댓글도 있던데 유튜브 운영 4년동안 무한의 굴레네요 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅠㅠㅠ 그냥 삭제하거나 무시하도록 하겠습니다. 축하드립니다
❤246
#비트코인 관점은 직전영상과 동일하게 가져가고있습니다. 가장 근접한 382부근인 76k부근을 기다리고있고 저는 손해보는걸 싫어하기떄문에 매매를 잠시 중단하고 해당자리만 기다리고있습니다. 만약 저 자리까지 떨어지지않는다면? 혹은 이탈한다면? 모든 경우의수에 대비를 해두고있기에 크게 포모가오거나 급해지진 않는거같습니다. 캔들 변동이 시원시원하게 슬슬 나와주길 바랄뿐입니다...ㅋㅋ
❤235
#비트코인 어제 영상내용입니다. 중요하게 보고있는 자리들 3군데 체크를 해놨고 해당 자리에서는 모두 매매를 진행할 생각입니다. 물론 일봉프레임이다보니 매수레인지가 넓기에 따로따로 오픈할 생각입니다. 이번 조정이후 저는 직전고점을 넘어가는 상승이 여전히 진행될거라고 생각하고있어서 한번 쓰윽 다 잡아먹어보겠습니다
❤226
영상업로드했습니다 이번엔 타점은 모두 공개하였으니 꼭 시청하기길 바랍니다 좋아요와 선플 부탁드립니다 형님들… https://youtu.be/E4DFL7xiTIw?si=EtZ1RWusdimyQYOz
❤211
깔끔하게 저점 터트렸으니 경로는 대강 나올거같습니다. 오늘영상에서 매수받을만한 자리 및 중요한 구간들 다 잡아서 만들어보겠습니다
❤208
우선 두가지경로 보고있습니다. 바로 떨어지면서 저점꺠고 우리가 기다리던 매수자리를 주느냐.. 혹은 한번더 반등하고 떨어지냐.. 결국적으로 저는 조정을 더 줘야한다고 보고있고 58k에서 올라온 상승에대한 조정에 저점은 나오지않았다고 생각합니다.
❤234
#비트코인 지난 영상에서 말씀드린것처럼 지금 상승이 애매하다고 생각합니다. 애매하다는게 타점을 어디서 잡을지 고민중이란 소리고 큰 관점자체의 틀은 동일하게 가져가고있습니다. 84.3k를 넘어간다면 혹은 저점을 깬다면 모션을 취해볼 수 있을거같은데 지금은 그닥...피하고싶은 자리네요 ㅋㅋ
❤237
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @BIT_DTR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“코인에 미친남자(비트코인)” (@BIT_DTR), 14,134 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BIT_DTR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.