Всем вам друзья хороших выходных 🤝
🤝13❤6🐳2

Channel
@BIRGEVOY_TREYDING_VOLKOV
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,549subscribers
-70 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001863040947 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BIRGEVOY_TREYDING_VOLKOV |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BIRGEVOY_TREYDING_VOLKOV |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 9,549 | -7 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:16 | 9,556 | -8 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 9,564 | -16 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 9,580 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 9,590 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 9,601 | -17 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 9,618 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 9,619 | first reading |
46 posts held, back to 24 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 46 (24 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 15,858 |
| Reactions total | 428 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
852 reactions across 44 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 196 | 23.0% | |
| 🤝 | 133 | 15.6% | |
| 🔥 | 110 | 12.9% | |
| 😁 | 92 | 10.8% | |
| 🤣 | 81 | 9.51% | |
| 💯 | 76 | 8.92% | |
| ❤ | 44 | 5.16% | |
| 🐳 | 33 | 3.87% | |
| 👀 | 29 | 3.40% | |
| 🤔 | 22 | 2.58% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 2.23% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 0.822% | |
| 🫡 | 6 | 0.704% | |
| 😎 | 3 | 0.352% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.117% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 852 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем вам друзья хороших выходных 🤝
🤝13❤6🐳2
МАГНИТ МСФО 1П 2026Г = УБЫТОК -9.5 МЛРД РУБ ПРОТИВ ПРИБЫЛИ +0.015 МЛРД РУБ ГОДОМ РАНЕЕ ☝️Отчёт мягко сказать плохой и весь отскок слили, но все это спекуль игры. Важно держать уровень, все остальное пыль. В понедельник ещё посмотрим🤝
👏5💯4🫡2
🍏Магнит неплохо от уровня отбился +5,1%
🔥7👍5✍1💯1
ЧИСТАЯ ПРИБЫЛЬ "ЛУКОЙЛА" ПО МСФО В I ПОЛУГОДИИ СОСТАВИЛА 430,9 МЛРД РУБ. ПРОТИВ 287 МЛРД РУБ. ГОДОМ РАНЕЕ ☝️Отличный отчёт Лукойла, весь вопрос в дивидендах теперь, но учитывая капекс по ремонту нпз тут ждать особой щедрости не стоит.
👍8💯5🔥3
Интересный паттерн в индексе Мосбиржи 3 черных вороны, данный паттерн предвещает дальнейшие снижение. Редко такое торгую, так ка не часто нужные параметры. Ну ок посмотрим🤝
👀11🔥9🤔4🤝3👍1😁1
☝️По Газпрому вчера практически пришли к верхней грани зоны ликвидности. Без суеты жду точку. Скрытый триггер имеется, все ждут отчёт, но это не АФК Система😁, если погонят то успеем🤝 Медвежий сценарий тоже рассматриваю, но бумага на уровнях 2008 и тут аккуратно нужно
👍11🐳3🔥3👏1
☝По нефти пока красиво, пришли к 90 и отбой вниз, что говорит о том, что ценовой диапазон живой. Важный момент если будет красная свечка на часовике с большим объемом, то буду рассматривать шорт. Лонг сейчас только выше 90$. Жду 🤝
🔥7🤝5👍4👀1🤔1
🏦Магнит ⚒Технический обзор В мае смотрели данную бумагу, где делал акцент на сильный уровень от которого часто глобально разворачивали бумагу. Работа с уровнями это особый пласт знаний и достижение уровня не означает окончания движения. В данном случае уровень был пробит вниз и как итог бумагу притащили на следующий этаж в -40%. Наглядный пример, что игнорируя технические данные можно нарваться вот на такую историю. …
👍16🔥6🐳5
Доброе утро друзья 🤝
🤝25🔥5❤2🐳1
⚠️🇮🇷#иран #геополитика Переговоров с Ираном на данный момент не ведется. Все опции на столе. Блокада остается в силе — Белый дом ☝️А вчера говорили, что мирт жвачка, да Трамп точно как из видео выше😁
😁8💯5🤣3
☝️Пример из нашей группы по обучению. Я очень рад, что смог правильно дать материал и участники уже сами ищут торговые идеи.
🔥7❤4🏆1
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @BIRGEVOY_TREYDING_VOLKOV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Биржевой трейдинг” (@BIRGEVOY_TREYDING_VOLKOV), 9,549 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BIRGEVOY_TREYDING_VOLKOV.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.