Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BIND.COM | Official Announcement Channel

@BINDdotCom

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,460subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001666157090
TypeChannel
Username@BINDdotCom
DescriptionBinding Yesterday With Tomorrow. Official links - https://linktr.ee/binddotcom
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BINDdotCom

Growth

6,4606,4756,467.57 August 2026 — 6,475 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,473 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,460 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,458–6,477 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:156,460-13
7 Aug 2026, 16:376,473-2
7 Aug 2026, 03:016,475first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 October 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
362
Videos
34
Links
42

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 14s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

176 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5631.8%
3821.6%
🤡3721.0%
🔥3218.2%
👎73.98%
👏21.14%
😁21.14%
🌭10.568%
💩10.568%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 176reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2023 to 18 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Dec 2023, 12:25 UTC≈2,230 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Will Bitcoin reach $68,000 again? 👀

  1. It’s going to the moon 🚀79%
  2. I don’t think it will happen again 👎21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12🤡4🌭1

30 Nov 2023, 06:28 UTC≈2,820 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026

GM guys. We wanted to give you an update on where we are with getting the app listed. Firstly, we wanted to apologise for the lack of communication on the project - it's still launching, we've just had to deal with a few hurdles with the actual listing of the app. Secondly, the app is built and completely functional - it looks amazing and is incredibly user friendly! Lastly, we are hoping for the app to go live i

👍206🤡6😁2🔥1

27 Nov 2023, 07:27 UTC≈2,410 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Name one #Crypto you want to stack the most! 💰

🤡6👍2

21 Nov 2023, 05:45 UTC≈2,700 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Pick your flavour and enjoy the benefits! Download the whitepaper today: www.bind.com

💩1

16 Nov 2023, 07:23 UTC≈2,270 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The future of financial freedom in the palm of your hand... Bind is coming to an app store near you soon! 💳

👍7

15 Nov 2023, 06:50 UTC≈1,760 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Choose from 4 flavours. Bind App coming soon 💥

👍1

14 Nov 2023, 07:15 UTC≈1,510 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Which card are you choosing? 💳

7👍1👎1

10 Nov 2023, 09:34 UTC≈1,810 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Make sure you follow us on Twitter for exclusive competitions and drops! https://twitter.com/BindComOfficial

👍1

6 Nov 2023, 12:45 UTC≈2,230 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Binding yesterday with tomorrow...

🔥5🤡3👍2👎1👏1

2 Nov 2023, 17:06 UTC≈2,240 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Crypto made easy… 🤑 Welcome to the Bind Xchange 📈 WAGMI with Bind 🚀

3🤡2👍1

31 Oct 2023, 05:33 UTC≈1,840 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

We’ve got more videos dropping on other functions of the app soon 🔥 Keep your eyes peeled! 👀

🤡9👍2

30 Oct 2023, 06:57 UTC≈2,030 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Which country are you investing from? 🌐

🤡6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BINDdotCom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Dec 2023, 12:25 UTCAnonymous Poll221 voters

Will Bitcoin reach $68,000 again? 👀

  1. It’s going to the moon 🚀79%
  2. I don’t think it will happen again 👎21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2023 to 18 December 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 981,736 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BIND.COM | Official Announcement Channel” (@BINDdotCom), 6,460 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BINDdotCom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.