Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

B&H Hungária

@BHH28

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,511subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002097407202
TypeChannel
Username@BHH28
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BHH28

Growth

1,4891,5111,5006 August 2026 — 1,491 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,491 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,489 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,511 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,486–1,514 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 10:331,511+22
10 Aug 2026, 01:061,489-2
7 Aug 2026, 07:341,491no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:031,491first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.3%
avg views ÷ 1,511 subscribers
Avg views / post
579
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (10 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total8,679
Reactions total249
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
54s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

305 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥14948.9%
👍5116.7%
❤‍🔥227.21%
👌227.21%
196.23%
134.26%
🫡103.28%
🤔61.97%
🤝41.31%
😎20.656%
😢20.656%
💩10.328%
😴10.328%
🙏10.328%
🤮10.328%
🥰10.328%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 305reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC85 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @skumshotPhoto

Do your part. Don't let our music die.

🔥6👍4

4 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC235 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @fxtnshcPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥1612👍1

30 Jul 2026, 10:20 UTC685 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nzona3Photo

🎙️ Megtisztulást! Megújulást! - Podcast ma este 19 órakor! ❓ Mi kerekedik ki egy olyan vitából, ahol egy asztalhoz ül az egykori NER értelmiségi holdudvarának egy meghatározó szereplője, egy szélsőjobboldali mozgalom vezetőségi tagja és egy radikálisan jobboldali hírportál újságírója? Mi az a #MozaikJobboldal? Mi az a #VilágnézetiBarikád? ⏰ Ma 19 órakor találkozzunk az NZónaPodcast YouTube csatornán és az összes fe

👌62🤝2👍1

28 Jul 2026, 19:36 UTC600 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @skumshotPhoto

Do you remember? (in the summer...)

🔥164💩1🙏1

28 Jul 2026, 06:43 UTC542 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nordicsunrecordsbudapestPhoto

https://hazajaroegylet.hu/tamogatas

👍15

24 Jul 2026, 16:42 UTC567 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nordicsunrecordsbudapestPhoto

❗️To our great regret, the event has been cancelled. Tickets that have already been purchased are valid for the “Night of the Nordic Sun vol. 3” concert to be held on December 19, or refunds can be requested.

🤔6😢2

23 Jul 2026, 19:51 UTC637 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @verszerzodesVideo

Nem árt már gyerek korban a fejbe vésni, hogy a kommunizmus öl, pusztít és nyomorba dönt! Vesszen minden ivadéka! Ellenállunk a végsőkig! ✋🏻✋🏻✋🏻

🔥221

22 Jul 2026, 05:56 UTC615 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @legiohungariaPhoto

📢 Vita a jobboldal jövőjéről - Szombaton Győrben A kerekasztal-beszélgetés résztvevői a jobboldal különböző szegmenseiből érkeznek, céljuk pedig hogy a magyar jobboldal jelenének és közeljövőjének legégetőbb kérdéseire választ találjanak egy konstruktív vita során. 🎤 A beszélgetés résztvevői ⬇️ 📖 Békés Márton a Kommentár folyóirat főszerkesztője ⚔️ Incze Béla, Mozgalmunk vezetőségi tagja 🖊️ Lipták Tamás a Magyar

👍75🔥1🫡1

21 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC598 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @InczeBela128Photo

Ha van alkotói közösség, akikkel szemben méltatlan az új rendszer a “múltat végleg eltörölni” hadjárata, akkor az a Hazajáró csapata. Tevékenységük bőven túlmutat önmagán. Ha csak a legismertebb műsorukat vesszük alapul, akkor is másfél évtizede önazonos, elvhű módon közvetítenek értékeket, sőt a virtuális kereteket szétfeszítve élő közösségeket teremtenek. A kérdés természetesen költői, de ettől még fel kell tenni

🫡9👍5🤝1

21 Jul 2026, 17:44 UTC538 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @loyaltyrac

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DsOz7bYru_A&pp=iggUQAFKEEQ4cTRPdjBXdHZiQ3JOMlc%3D

🔥8

20 Jul 2026, 05:44 UTC525 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @skumshotPhoto

🖕🏻

🔥22👌9👍4🥰1

16 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC873 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nordicsunpubPhoto

☠️Jegyek személyesen is válthatók a Nordic Sun Budapest Pub-ban.

🔥14👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @BHH28. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 269,106 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“B&H Hungária” (@BHH28), 1,511 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BHH28.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.