Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 曝博社曝光--全网黑平台收录中心

Channel

曝博社曝光--全网黑平台收录中心

@BBSQWBG

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

798subscribers

-55 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001131666866
TypeChannel
Username@BBSQWBG
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/BBSQWBG

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

798853825.57 August 2026 — 853 subscribers8 August 2026 — 853 subscribers15 August 2026 — 839 subscribers21 August 2026 — 828 subscribers27 August 2026 — 819 subscribers4 September 2026 — 804 subscribers13 September 2026 — 798 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net -55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 790–861 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 15:54798-6
4 Sept 2026, 23:02804-15
27 Aug 2026, 13:25819-9
21 Aug 2026, 07:26828-11
15 Aug 2026, 05:59839-14
8 Aug 2026, 01:19853no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:02853first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 21 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 12 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 May 2026, 06:32 UTC693 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#网友曝光 #皇冠信用盘 #博胜公司! 我充值了12000占8成 客服没有任何理由给我拉黑了,且说需要我再转一笔资金去验证是我本人下分 他们冒充“皇冠官方”名义进行诈骗,打着“皇冠博胜信用盘”的旗号吸引玩家,并且专门搭建了“Hg3366.com充值网站进行收款。 最少骗了有几百万资金! 他们这群人花钱在导航买流量 此人在诈骗团队在TG导航上买了很多广告 基本上全部是他们 希望大家及时止损! 骗子机器人:@MOS011_BOT @hg8886_vip 骗子ID:@BBG8888 ⚠️ 投稿曝光 😀 色情直播 😍 信誉平台

2

12 May 2026, 06:31 UTC611 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#T1体育 就是杀猪盘.实锤了的.每一个平台信誉盘像你们这样的.照你们这样混事你们盘总都喝西北风啊你们后台主管是不是就是杀猪盘出身的.我知道你们为什么会杀.就是因为我胜率高 不输钱 所以随便找个小问题.然后小题大做把我吃了.对吧.我懂.不好意思 我就是亏不了.气不气.终于给你们找到机会了.填补下代理线的负盈利.你们后台说是三方的反馈.我没见到任何反馈 我就只听到了很模糊的问题和回答.我不知道是不是你们内部人为的.这种事说不好.我也不找朋友我朋友了.我不想麻烦我朋友.就事论事.找客服就踢皮球 找到上级上级就劝我接受了.索性不装了.显得他们更有理.世界杯你他妈的代理线亏死你个王八狗娘的畜生东西.飞机名字叫牧.歌有个群.天天带滚球.你滚你妈逼 谁要你带 老子自己玩的都比你好.你有什么b脸带滚球的.跟他的人都小心点.到时候把你吃了他还有理有据假装无辜.到时候吃亏的是你自己.在他代理线的趁早换个大点靠谱的平台.输了的就算了.别到时候回点血

21 Apr 2026, 01:25 UTC748 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

全网最无赖的杀猪网 #9号贵宾厅 9.vip 我第一次入了100U去游戏然后亏完了。第二次也是入100U入游戏,玩的都是PG电子,结果出来139U就风控了,叫我打他们网站指定的游戏10倍,而且最低单注要10U,打完流水出款结果又退回来了,又叫我继续打他们指定的游戏8倍,真没想到有这么黑的网站,输钱了还搞这种手段,要黑款直接说,无限罚流水这种低级手段也用,又要当婊子,又想给自己立牌坊。临近世界杯了,大家注意这个杀猪网,到时百分百要收割了。 ⚠️ 投稿曝光 😀 色情直播 😍 信誉平台

2

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @BBSQWBG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“曝博社曝光--全网黑平台收录中心” (@BBSQWBG), 798 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BBSQWBG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.