Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BBC News Mundo

@BBCes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,615subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001133293455
TypeChannel
Username@BBCes
DescriptionNo es un canal oficial de BBC Mundo. Fuente: bbcmundo.com
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BBCes

Growth

15,61415,62715,620.56 August 2026 — 15,618 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,618 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,614 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,622 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,624 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,627 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,622 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,621 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,615 subscribers15,6156 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,612–15,629 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:1515,615-6
11 Aug 2026, 14:3815,621-1
10 Aug 2026, 16:5315,622-5
9 Aug 2026, 17:2115,627+3
8 Aug 2026, 14:4515,624+2
7 Aug 2026, 17:4315,622+8
6 Aug 2026, 14:2315,614-4
6 Aug 2026, 02:2015,618no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:3615,618first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.52%
avg views ÷ 15,615 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,170
52 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.981%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
52
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held52 (4 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total61,048
Reactions total599
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
43,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

467 reactions across 38 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥14931.9%
😱459.64%
👍388.14%
👎357.49%
🤔265.57%
🤡245.14%
👏234.93%
194.07%
😢153.21%
💩143.00%
🤯143.00%
😁122.57%
🤮112.36%
🕊91.93%
🤬71.50%
🙏51.07%
🤣51.07%
🥱40.857%
🌭20.428%
🖕20.428%
5 further kinds81.71%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 599reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC≈1,600 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Los prisioneros desesperados que llaman a la BBC desde el corredor de la muerte en Arabia Saudita https://www.bbc.com/mundo/articles/c79g7y28vrzo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

🔥7😢4😁2

9 Aug 2026, 22:43 UTC≈2,180 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Puerto Rico raciona el suministro de agua en medio de una intensa sequía https://www.bbc.com/mundo/articles/c5ydjegg35xo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

🔥82😢1

9 Aug 2026, 22:42 UTC≈1,600 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Ecuador imputa a un exministro y otras 6 personas en el caso del asesinato del candidato presidencial Fernando Villavicencio https://www.bbc.com/mundo/articles/ckgdlp0rn0do?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

👍4🔥4

9 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC≈1,640 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Cuán común es el "turismo de nacimientos" por el que Trump quiere recortar la ciudadanía directa por nacer en EE.UU. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/articles/cly83k3x1y4o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

🔥6👍3

9 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC≈1,370 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Netanyahu anuncia el rechazo de Israel al plan de 15 puntos para Gaza propuesto por Trump https://www.bbc.com/mundo/articles/c935wn3yxrxo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

👎4🔥4👍2🤮2😈1

9 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC≈1,280 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Eclipse solar total: Avellanosa de Muñó, el pequeño pueblo de España que por una noche será uno de los lugares más fascinantes del planeta https://www.bbc.com/mundo/articles/cwymvm84p9ko?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

🔥71🤡1

9 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC≈1,160 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

El bloguero Perez Hilton enfrenta una larga recuperación tras los reportes de que se autolesionó durante una transmisión en vivo https://www.bbc.com/mundo/articles/c1w19qpryq7o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

🔥4🥱4🤮2😱1

9 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC≈1,240 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Cómo Italia, un país famoso por la saludable dieta mediterránea, acabó teniendo tantos niños obesos https://www.bbc.com/mundo/articles/cx2mrppm26do?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

🔥5🤡2😢1

8 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC≈1,480 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Fenya, la jerga clandestina de las prisiones soviéticas que ahora usan ciberdelincuentes y políticos como Putin https://www.bbc.com/mundo/articles/clyxgzk6e4jo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

🔥7👎3

8 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC≈1,360 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Huesos de mamut, buques nazis y bombas sin explotar: los vestigios del pasado que sacó a la luz la histórica sequía en Europa https://www.bbc.com/mundo/articles/c5yv2rlzd40o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

😱5🔥2👍1

8 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC≈1,180 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

España impone controles fronterizos a Italia y se agudiza la tensión entre Sánchez y Meloni por la llegada de migrantes a Ceuta https://www.bbc.com/mundo/articles/czxq1ppnw18o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

🔥8👏3

8 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC≈1,090 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026

3 momentos que marcaron la posesión de Abelardo de la Espriella como presidente de Colombia (y qué dicen sobre cómo será su gobierno) https://www.bbc.com/mundo/articles/cz64y70l8wzo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

👏9🤡4🤔2👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @BBCes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 503,571 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

The New York Times
@nytimes · 176,754
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BBC News Mundo” (@BBCes), 15,615 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BBCes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.