Channel
@BAZA_Traff
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,062subscribers
-349 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002426273526 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BAZA_Traff |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BAZA_Traff |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 2,062 | -65 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 2,127 | -34 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 2,161 | -46 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 2,207 | -55 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 2,262 | -64 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 2,326 | -46 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 2,372 | -34 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 2,406 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 2,411 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (29 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,540 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
🚀BAZA ADS — 21 поток FB Ads [КАРЖ] + Google ads 1 СЛОТ 🤖BOT базы обучения (первый урок бесплатный) Открыт набор на обучение по платному FB трафику. Внутри: — обучение FB Ads и Google Ads — рабочие связки и креативы — пошаговая система запуска — подготовка к первому проливу — разбор ошибок и вопросов — приватные материалы — поддержка кураторов — доступ к закрытым чатам и инструментам Подойдёт: — новичкам с нуля — …
🚀 Начало рабочего дня Обновили всем связки на текущие оффера. Если не скинули - отпишите мне в лс @donn_evi 📱Обновления FB ADS • Актуализировали рекомендации по запуску и прогреву аккаунтов. • Обновили часть рабочих связок под текущие офферы. • Добавили новые примеры креативов и вариантов тестирования. • Расширили блок по антифроду и типичным ошибкам при старте. • Пересобрали материалы по расходникам и подготовке а…
💬Слотов НЕТ Набор в 21 поток завершен.
📝 Небольшой апдейт по каналу Ребят, многие уже заметили, что в последнее время постов стало немного меньше. Причина простая — сейчас часть команды находится в отпусках, а основное время уходит на сопровождение действующих потоков обучения, проверку запусков и работу с учениками. Для нас это всегда в приоритете. Но это временно. Уже совсем скоро все вернутся в рабочий режим, и мы снова увеличим активность в канале.…
🚀 Обновили FB-связки Всем действующим ученикам уже загрузили актуальные обновления по 📱: обновлены рабочие связки, креативы и рекомендации под текущие офферы. Если по какой-то причине обновления у вас еще не появились — напишите своему кэпу в ЛС. Проверим доступ и сразу все обновим. 📥Пишите: @BAZA_Capitan или своему закрепленному сапу.
Утренний кит Оффер Sol (NEW), ключи базы.
📱 FB Ads: почему новичкам нельзя копировать запуск “1 в 1” Одна из самых частых ошибок — увидеть чей-то рабочий запуск и попытаться полностью повторить его под копирку. Те же креативы. Те же тексты. Те же настройки. Те же аудитории. Но FB Ads так почти никогда не работает стабильно. Почему: • у всех разный траст аккаунтов • разная история BM • разные FanPage • разные гео и аукцион • разная реакция аудитории • даж…
⚡Почему хорошие креативы перестают работать быстрее, чем раньше Ещё пару лет назад можно было найти один удачный креатив и спокойно лить его неделями. Сейчас 📱FB работает совсем по-другому. Алгоритм стал намного быстрее: — выжигать подходы — понимать паттерны — и уставать от одинаковой подачи Из-за этого многие новички сталкиваются с одной и той же ситуацией: Вчера креатив давал: 📈дешёвый трафик 📈хороший CTR 📈но…
📸Вчерашний кит Оффер TON, траф фб карж. Связка и крео базы.
Video message, posted without a caption
📱 FB Ads: не путайте плохой креатив и плохой оффер Иногда новичок видит слабие цифры и сразу думает: “креатив не зашёл”. Но проблема не всегда в баннере. Бывает так, что креатив кликают нормально, CTR живой, CPC адекватный, но дальше человек не делает нужное действие. В таком случае креатив свою задачу выполнил: он привёл внимание. Проблема может быть уже в другом: • оффер непонятный • слишком слабый первый экран…
⚡️ Осталось 4 слота Писать по форме заявки: Хочу в BAZA (FB) — опыт в трафике — готовность к оплате (USDT / ETH / др.) — вопросы по курсу — скрин профиля Evi-Crypto @donn_evi @BAZA_Capitan
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @BAZA_Traff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 255,460 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚡️BAZA Трафик FB/Google | Обучение Google FB” (@BAZA_Traff), 2,062 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BAZA_Traff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.