Channel
@BAPoliticalScienceDU
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,250subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001416888997 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BAPoliticalScienceDU |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BAPoliticalScienceDU |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 4,250 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 4,252 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (9 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,510 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
4 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 75.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Re-Registration: Last date extended till 31 August 2026, without late fees, for both Online and ODL modes 👉 Re-Registration: onlinerr.ignou.ac.in Fresh Admission – July 2026 Cycle: Last date extended till 31 August 2026 for all programmes under both Online and ODL modes Admission Portals: ODL: ignouadmission.samarth.edu.in Online: ignouiop.samarth.edu.in
👍1
Signed PWGC
Democracy: 5 Thinkers, 5 Definitions From Aristotle to Schumpeter, 5 ways democracy has been defined throughout history 🗳️⚖️ Check it out on Instagram 👉 https://www.instagram.com/p/DcGe8oIidTk/?igsh=b3FtNGJxZnE2aW9i Follow there for more, and stay tuned here for deeper dives! 🔔
Signed PWGC
🇮🇳 Padhai With GURU CHELA की ओर से आप सभी को स्वतंत्रता दिवस की हार्दिक शुभकामनाएँ! 🇮🇳💐 "वन्दे मातरम्, सुजलां सुफलां, मलयजशीतलाम्। शस्यश्यामलां मातरम्, वन्दे मातरम्!" 🇮🇳 आइए, उन वीरों को नमन करें जिन्होंने देश की आज़ादी के लिए अपना सर्वस्व न्योछावर कर दिया। हमारा तिरंगा सदैव ऊँचा रहे और भारत की एकता व अखंडता हमेशा कायम रहे। 🫡🇮🇳 वन्दे मातरम्! 🇮🇳 जय हिन्द! 🇮🇳
❤3
Signed PWGC
📢 𝑫𝑼 𝑺𝑶𝑳 𝑪𝑳𝑨𝑺𝑺𝑬𝑺 𝑺𝑪𝑯𝑬𝑫𝑼𝑳𝑬 𝑹𝑬𝑳𝑬𝑨𝑺𝑬𝑫! 🏫📚 ✅ 𝑪𝒉𝒆𝒄𝒌 your 𝑪𝒐𝒖𝒓𝒔𝒆, 𝑪𝒍𝒂𝒔𝒔 𝑫𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒔 & 𝑺𝒕𝒖𝒅𝒚 𝑪𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒆 carefully. 📌 𝑪𝒉𝒆𝒄𝒌 𝒀𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝑺𝒄𝒉𝒆𝒅𝒖𝒍𝒆 & 𝑷𝒍𝒂𝒏 𝒀𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝑪𝒍𝒂𝒔𝒔𝒆𝒔 accordingly! 📚✨
Signed PWGC
Comment your score below! 👇 🎥 Full explanation in our latest video — https://youtu.be/VZtsibGE2fw?si=XYDlHYwBJnoFpNIt
Signed PWGC
The phrase "political theory... explains, illuminates, understands, evaluates, enlightens and alters" best captures which core argument for studying it?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed PWGC
According to C. Wright Mills, political theory functions as all of the following EXCEPT:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed PWGC
John Plamenatz compared political theorists to which of the following (NOT "honest shopkeepers")?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed PWGC
Who argued that political theory is essentially a branch of moral philosophy, tasked with designing appropriate institutions, procedures, and policies?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed PWGC
According to David Held, which of these is NOT one of the three functions of political theory as a science?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed PWGC
Comment your score below! 👇 🎥 Full explanation in our latest video — https://youtu.be/dZkqMiVmeSg?si=StugJbt-BZhE0Yc-
Signed PWGC
The concept of "Just War Theory" is most associated with:
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed PWGC
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @BAPoliticalScienceDU. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The phrase "political theory... explains, illuminates, understands, evaluates, enlightens and alters" best captures which core argument for studying it?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
According to C. Wright Mills, political theory functions as all of the following EXCEPT:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
John Plamenatz compared political theorists to which of the following (NOT "honest shopkeepers")?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Who argued that political theory is essentially a branch of moral philosophy, tasked with designing appropriate institutions, procedures, and policies?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
According to David Held, which of these is NOT one of the three functions of political theory as a science?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
The concept of "Just War Theory" is most associated with:
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 94,999 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DU BA Political Science | Padhai with Guru Chela” (@BAPoliticalScienceDU), 4,250 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BAPoliticalScienceDU.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.