Channel
@B1ack_stones
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
63subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003938708604 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @B1ack_stones |
| Created | 28 May 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/B1ack_stones |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:59 | 63 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 67 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 70 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 73 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 74 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 74 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
45 reactions across 4 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 4974253439430166652 | 9 | 20.0% | |
| custom 4972417289371518833 | 6 | 13.3% | |
| custom 4974507564055135891 | 6 | 13.3% | |
| custom 4974247520965232364 | 4 | 8.89% | |
| custom 4974683223922575325 | 4 | 8.89% | |
| custom 4972368824960550328 | 3 | 6.67% | |
| custom 4972417014493611721 | 3 | 6.67% | |
| custom 4974258881153730135 | 3 | 6.67% | |
| custom 4974532075433494162 | 2 | 4.44% | |
| custom 4974594786250983972 | 2 | 4.44% | |
| custom 4972051877848942750 | 1 | 2.22% | |
| custom 4974393927810418755 | 1 | 2.22% | |
| custom 4974722170686015274 | 1 | 2.22% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 3 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @B1ack_stones. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 5 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2026 to 3 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
cr: @fckwmz
custom 49742534394301666526custom 49724172893715188334custom 49724170144936117213custom 49742475209652323642custom 49742588811537301352custom 49745947862509839722custom 49746832239225753252custom 49745075640551358911
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 ❤️ rules 🤩chat🤩 🤩 administration 🦋TikTok 💳Boost 🦋 Black Stones The Best
custom 49723688249605503283custom 49745075640551358913custom 49720518778489427501custom 49747221706860152741
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🤩wner🔗@arieIlI 🤩o-owner🔗@donl1i 🤩dmin 🤩hat🔗@A1NN8T 🤩dmin 🤩ctive 🔗@Hyilo29292 🤩dmin 🤩ideo🔗@fckwmz 🤩dmin 🤩ew 🔗 🤩dmin 🤩lliances🔗@PAII0RR1
custom 49724172893715188332custom 49742475209652323642custom 49745075640551358912custom 49745320754334941622
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 1️⃣ Уважение 🔗Уважайте каждого участника и администрацию. 🔗Оскорбления, унижения, токсичность и провокации запрещены. 🔗Конфликты решаются спокойно через администрацию. 2️⃣ Актив 🔗Не игнорируйте чат полностью. 🔗Старайтесь поддерживать общение и атмосферу. 🔗Долгий неактив без предупреждения — возможен кик. 3️⃣ Спам 🔗Запрещён флуд, спам, капс и бессмысленные сообщения. 🔗Не засоряйте…
custom 49742534394301666523custom 49746832239225753252custom 49742588811537301351custom 49743939278104187551
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @B1ack_stones. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐵𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑘 𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑠” (@B1ack_stones), 63 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/B1ack_stones.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.