6 measurements spanning 15 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,143–3,171 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 00:57
3,157
-7
2 Sept 2026, 15:52
3,164
-4
30 Aug 2026, 14:47
3,168
+2
27 Aug 2026, 20:13
3,166
+12
25 Aug 2026, 03:42
3,154
+8
24 Aug 2026, 08:45
3,146
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
60.0%
avg views ÷ 3,157 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,900
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.716%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held
20 (19 June 2026 – 18 August 2026)
Views total
13,270
Reactions total
70
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
169 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👎
100
59.2%
❤
44
26.0%
👍
14
8.28%
🙏
11
6.51%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
آزادسازی مدرک بدون کارت پایان خدمت
با توجه به امکان خرید تعهدات در حال حاضر به قیمت روز، یک راه جهت آزادسازی مدرک فارغ التحصیلان پسر که باید سربازی اجباری را بگذرانند، وجود دارد.
قبل از طرح روش، دو نکته ضروری است:
۱. علاوه بر سربازی باید وضعیت طرح شما هم مشخص باشد، یعنی از طرح معاف باشید یا برای طرح وثیقه گذاری بکنید.
۲. طرح این راه، به معنای شانس اجرا یا موفقیت آن در واقعیت نیست، بلکه به عنوان یک راه حقوقی و روی کا…
مهمترین سوالات متداول در خصوص متعهدین قانون عدالت آموزشی
❗️متفاوت با تعهد آموزش رایگان، مشمولین این قانون شرایط خاص و منحصر به فرد دارند❗️
سوال سه. صدور مجوز مطب مشمولین قانون برقراری عدالت آموزشی چه شرایطی وجود دارد؟
در رویه عملی، دانشگاههای علوم پزشکی براساس بند ۳ ماده ۱۹ دستورالعمل اجرایی «قانون اصلاح قانون برقراری عدالت آموزشی در پذیرش دانشجو در دورههای تحصیلات تکمیلی و تخصصی» مصوب ۲۳ بهمن ۱۴۰۱ وزیر بهداشت …
مهمترین سوالات متداول در خصوص متعهدین قانون عدالت آموزشی
❗️متفاوت با تعهد آموزش رایگان، مشمولین این قانون شرایط خاص و منحصر به فرد دارند❗️
سوال دو. مدت طرح اجباری قانون خدمت پزشکان و پیراپزشکان از دوره تعهدات قانون برقراری عدالت آموزشی کسر میشود؟
در ماده ۱۵ قانون «خدمت پزشکان و پیراپزشکان» وضعیت تعهدات «قانون تامین وسايل و امكانات تحصيل اطفال و جوانان ايراني» به صراحت روشن شده و انجام طرح به عنوان قسمتي از تعهد…
مهمترین سوالات متداول در خصوص متعهدین قانون عدالت آموزشی
❗️متفاوت با تعهد آموزش رایگان، مشمولین این قانون شرایط خاص و منحصر به فرد دارند❗️
سوال یک. در خصوص نحوه محاسبه دوره کارورزی پزشکی در خصوص متعهدین مناطق محروم (مشمولین قانون عدالت آموزشی) به چه صورت انجام میشود؟
پاسخ: مطابق با تبصره ۱ اصلاحی ماده واحده «قانون برقراري عدالت آموزشي در پذيرش دانشجو در دورههاي تحصيلات تكميلي و تخصصي» میزان تعهد خدمت براساس اعم…
طبق این ماده (نسخه اولیه و تصویب نشده)، ارتباط غیر مجاز با نهادهای بینالمللی از جمله شامل نهادهای علمی یا نهادهای وابسته به سازمان ملل مانند بهداشت جهانی یا یونیسف، میتواند موجب محکومیت به جزای نقدی (از ۱۶۵ تا ۳۳۰ میلیون تومان) بشود.
مطابق این ماده (نسخه اولیه و تصویب نشده)، اخذ بورسیه صرفاً از دانشگاههای مجاز و مطابق لیست اعلامی مجاز است و اگر به هر دلیلی دانشگاه مقصد شما در فهرست مجاز نباشد (به جای پیشبینی فهرست غیرمجاز که قاعدتاً تعداد کمتری خواهد داشت) و اقدام به همکاری علمی با آن دانشگاه بکنید به شش ماه تا دو سال زندان محکوم خواهید شد.
در روزهای اخیر، کلیات «طرح مقابله با نفوذ سرویسهای اطلاعاتی و دولتها یا نهادهای بیگانه در کشور» (فایل پیوست) در مجلس تصویب شده است. جزییات این طرح در کمیسیون مربوطه و صحن مجلس نیز باید به تصویب برسد و هنوز نهایی نشده اما تجربه طرحهای مشابه نشان داده، خروجی کار چندان متفاوت با نسخه اولیه نیست.
چند ماده از این طرح، با موضوع این کانال مشابهت و نزدیکی دارد. این مواد را در چند پست بررسی میکنیم.
اول اینکه متوجه علت این واکنش منفی نمیشم، اگر مشکلی هست، بنویسید
دوم اینکه این راه حل آخرین راه هست، یعنی یا میشه و مدرک تون به نرخ زمان استنکاف آزاد میشه یا نمیشه و کلا بیخیال کار حقوقی برای آزادسازی باید بشوید.
مخاطب صرفا کسانی هستند که رای قطعی منفی برای آزادسازی دارند.
این راه براساس مشورت با برخی قضات دیوان عدالت اداری به دست اومده
برای اینکه جزئی از این راه باشید، فقط و فقط در قسمت نظرات پیام زیر، اعلام آمادگ…
طبق این نظرسنجی، صد نفر از مخاطبین این کانال دارای رای قطعی رد شکایت آزادسازی هستند.
این صد نفر جهت اطلاع از اقدام حقوقی برای دوباره به جریان انداختن پروندهشان در قسمت کامنت این پیام، اعلام آمادگی بکنند.
برای شناسایی تعداد مشمولین یه حرکت حقوقی لطفا به سوال زیر به دقت پاسخ بدهید.
آیا شکایت شما در دیوان عدالت اداری با خواستهی آزادسازی به نرخ زمان استنکاف رد شده است؟
نکات: فقط با خواسته زمان استنکاف شامل گزینه بله می شود. رای بدوی یا تجدیدنظر مهم نیست.
بله79%
خیر21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
امروز که عدهای از دوستان به دفاتر خدمات قضایی مراجعه کردند برای ثبت اعاده دادرسی با مشکل عدم امکان اضافه کردن «متقاضی اعاده دادرسی» روبرو شدند.
برای حل این مشکل، از دفتر خدمات قضایی بخواهید به شرح زیر اقدام کند:
۱. بعد از ورود شماره تصمیم نهایی و پرونده، روی آیکن بازیابی کلید نمایید.
۲. پس از باز شدن تب استعلام از ثنا (تصویر بالا) روی گزینه «خیر» کلید نمایید.
۳. بعد از این اقدام، همچنان امکان اضافه کردن شخص به عنوان…
🙏6👎5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Azadsazi_MHMD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
برای شناسایی تعداد مشمولین یه حرکت حقوقی لطفا به سوال زیر به دقت پاسخ بدهید.
آیا شکایت شما در دیوان عدالت اداری با خواستهی آزادسازی به نرخ زمان استنکاف رد شده است؟
نکات: فقط با خواسته زمان استنکاف شامل گزینه بله می شود. رای بدوی یا تجدیدنظر مهم نیست.
بله79%
خیر21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
IELTS Journal @ieltsjournalchannel · 51,254 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
medistU | مدیستیو @medistU · 53,575 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
طب اورژانس EMERGENCY @med_info · 33,942 Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آزادنامه؛ آموزش عمومی حقوق” (@Azadsazi_MHMD), 3,157 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Azadsazi_MHMD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.