Channel
@Azad_Inst
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,027subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002675627699 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Azad_Inst |
| Description | Azad Institution hosts international conversations on global political, economic, and cultural issues—with a special lens on Iran and its regional context. Our Youtube Channel: Youtube.com/@AzadInst |
| Created | 18 April 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Azad_Inst |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 1,027 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 18 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (18 April 2025 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,920 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 00:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
290 reactions across 8 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 176 | 60.7% | |
| 👏 | 47 | 16.2% | |
| ❤ | 22 | 7.59% | |
| 👎 | 13 | 4.48% | |
| 🍾 | 6 | 2.07% | |
| 💊 | 5 | 1.72% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 1.72% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 1.03% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 0.69% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.345% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.345% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.345% | |
| 🎃 | 1 | 0.345% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.345% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 0.345% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.345% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.345% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.345% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.345% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.345% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 290reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2025 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Azad’s international debates are returning. In the weeks ahead, we’ll publish conversations with distinguished Iranian and international scholars, policymakers, and leading voices on Iran, the region, and the wider world. Serious questions, different perspectives, and conversations worth hearing. Subscribe to our YouTube channel and stay tuned for new episodes: YouTube.com/@AzadInst 🆔 @Azad_Inst
❤10👍8👏2❤🔥1👌1
🎥 Elements of a New US-Iran Deal From Azad archive 🔺Nasser Hadian: A treaty won’t stop future U.S. withdrawal. Sealing enriched uranium inside Iran under IAEA control is a stronger deterrent. 🔻Robert Einhorn: To avoid conflict, we need longer breakout time, restored IAEA access, and sanctions relief. A deal is possible—if both sides focus. 🆔 @Azad_Inst
👍9👎1
🎥 US & the Changing Middle East From Azad archive 🔺Noam Chomskey: The Chinese-brokered Saudi-Iran agreement is breaking the US-Saudi-Israeli regional system. The US and Israel are desperate. Gulf states moving toward China—and the Global South refusing to align with the US—signal a major shift in global power. 🎞🆔 @Azad_Inst
👍9👎1💊1
🎥 Nuclear Weapon is Suicidal for Iran From Azad archive 🔺Noam Chomskey: If Iran develops a nuclear weapon, it’s not a deterrent—it’s a call for destruction. The US and Israel would destroy Iran the moment it moved in that direction. The only viable path is a nuclear weapons-free zone in the region, supported globally but blocked by the US and Israel. 🆔 @Azad_Inst
👍15👎9👏2
🎥 The US Will Not Decline From Azad archive 🔺 Noam Chomskey: Despite decades of talk, the US is not declining. It still dominates in military power and global corporate wealth. The war in Ukraine was a gift—it weakened Russia and pushed Europe deeper under US influence. And now, the US is building military alliances to contain China. 🆔 @Azad_Inst
👍21❤1👏1🤮1
The discussion on US-Iran nuclear talks between Robert Einhorn from Brookings Institute, the Secretary of State’s Special Advisor for Nonproliferation and Arms Control during the Obama Administration and a member of the US Delegation to the P5+1 talks with Iran (2009–2013), and Nasser Hadian, a University of Tehran professor and a prominent, respected Iran expert on nuclear issues, marks the first public conversation…
👏40👍11👌2❤1🍓1👎1👾1💊1
🎥 The Iran Nuclear Issue: Can Negotiations Succeed? A Debate between Robert Einhorn and Nasser Hadian 🔺 Nasser Hadian: A legal solution can’t address our concern about a sustainable nuclear deal. Even if a new deal becomes a treaty through Congress, there’s always the possibility of withdrawal. What can help us more is keeping the extra uranium inside Iran, sealed and controlled under the supervision of the IAEA. Th…
👍55❤6🔥5🍌2💊2🎃1🐳1👎1
Hey everyone! We’re starting something new: real conversations across borders. Politics, economy, culture — from Tehran to Washington, Berlin and London. We’ll be sitting down with scholars and change-makers to talk about the big stuff. Stay tuned! First episode drops soon. Our Youtube Channel: Youtube.com/@AzadInst Instagram: Instagram.com/AzadInst_ X: X.com/AzadInst_
👍48🍾6❤4👏2💊1🕊1🤡1😍1
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @Azad_Inst. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 13,859 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Azad Institution” (@Azad_Inst), 1,027 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Azad_Inst.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.