Channel
@AtharArchive1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,223subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002062471664 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AtharArchive1 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AtharArchive1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 1,223 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 1,222 | no change |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 1,222 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 July 2026 – 26 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,624 |
| Reactions total | 38 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
47 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 59.6% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 31.9% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 6.38% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Yaḥyā ibn Zakariyyā said: I was with Sufyān ibn ʿUyaynah, may Allah have mercy upon him, when a man said to him: “We have found five categories of people who disbelieved and did not believe.” He said: “Who are they?” He replied: “The Jahmiyyah, the Qadariyyah, the Murjiʾah, the Rāfiḍah, and the Christians.” He said: “How so?” 1 — The Jahmiyyah Allah, Blessed and Exalted, said: “And Allah spoke to Mūsā directl…
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
The Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: “By the One in Whose Hand is my soul, if a man were killed in the path of Allah, then brought back to life, then killed again and brought back to life, then killed once more, while he still had a debt outstanding, he would not enter Paradise until his debt was settled.” 📚 Ṣaḥīḥ al-Targhīb wa al-Tarhīb, no. 1804
Spreading the correct creed and refuting those who oppose it is an obligation upon every student of knowledge following the Atharī methodology, especially in a time when corrupt beliefs and deviant doctrines have become widespread. Imam Abū Saʿīd al-Dārimī (may Allah have mercy upon him) said: “It is not permissible for a Muslim who possesses any form of clarification or proof, and who is in a town where the speec…
❤4
Imam al-Dārimī (may Allah have mercy upon him) said: “The sincere monotheist in his Tawḥīd is the one who affirms Allah’s Oneness with all of His perfection, and with all of His Attributes: in His Knowledge, His Speech, His taking hold, His extending and granting, His descending, and His rising [over the throne]…” 📚 Al-Naqḍ ʿalā al-Marīsī
Ibn Abī Zayd al-Qayrawānī (d. 386 AH) said: “Part of the position of Ahl al-Sunnah is that one who is led by his personal reasoning (ijtihād) to an innovation (bidʿah) is not excused. This is because the Khawārij exerted themselves in interpretation (taʾwīl), yet they were not excused when their interpretation caused them to depart from the way of the Companions. Therefore, the Prophet ﷺ called them ‘those who hav…
❤2🔥1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Imām Aḥmad ibn Naṣr al-Khuzāʿī رحمه الله Al-Wāthiq asked him: “What do you say regarding the Qur’an?” He replied: “It is the Speech of Allah.” He asked: “Is it created?” He replied: “It is the Speech of Allah.” He asked: “Do you believe that you will see your Lord on the Day of Resurrection?” He replied: “This is how the narration has come.” Then al-Wāthiq had him beheaded after they stretched out his neck wit…
❤3🔥1
Marwān ibn Muḥammad al-Asadī al-Shāmī رحمه الله said: “Three are not to be trusted regarding the religion: the Ṣūfī, the storyteller (al-Qaṣṣāṣ), and an innovator who refutes the people of desires (Ahl al-Ahwāʾ).” 📚 Tartīb al-Madārik, 3/226
❤3🔥1
It is reported in Kitāb al-Sunnah of Imām ʿAbdullāh ibn Aḥmad: He said: My father narrated to me: Muʿādh ibn Muʿādh narrated to us; Ḥammād ibn Salamah narrated to us; Thābit al-Bunānī narrated to us, from Anas ibn Mālik, from the Prophet ﷺ, concerning His saying: ﴿فَلَمَّا تَجَلَّىٰ رَبُّهُ لِلْجَبَلِ جَعَلَهُ دَكًّا﴾ “Then, when his Lord manifested Himself to the mountain, He made it crumble.” [al-Aʿrāf 7:143] …
❤2🔥1
Muʿāwiyah ibn Abī Sufyān (may Allah be pleased with him) delivered a Friday sermon, and among what he said was: “Give in charity, and let no man say, ‘I possess only little.’ For indeed, the charity of one who has little is better than the charity of the wealthy.” “Beware of slandering chaste women. A man may say, ‘I heard,’ or ‘It reached me,’ yet he repeats the accusation. By Allah, if one of you were to falsel…
❤6🔥1
Imām al-Jarḥ wa al-Taʿdīl (the Imam of criticism and authentication of narrators), Yaḥyā ibn Maʿīn (may Allah have mercy upon him) said: “Everyone who insults ʿUthmān, Ṭalḥah, or any of the Companions of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ (may Allah be pleased with them all) is a dajjāl. Nothing is written from him, and upon him is the curse of Allah, the angels, and all of mankind.” 📚 Tahdhīb al-Kamāl fī Asmāʾ al-Rijāl
🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AtharArchive1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 660,842 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Āthār Archive” (@AtharArchive1), 1,223 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AtharArchive1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.