Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Atenov_D × Общество ликвидированных

@Atenov_D

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

847subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002145140039
TypeChannel
Username@Atenov_D
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Atenov_D

Growth

8398478436 August 2026 — 839 subscribers7 August 2026 — 844 subscribers14 August 2026 — 847 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 838–848 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:18847+3
7 Aug 2026, 19:30844+5
6 Aug 2026, 19:47839first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 12 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.4%
avg views ÷ 847 subscribers
Avg views / post
520
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (12 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,560
Reactions total79
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

493 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19439.4%
🔥15431.2%
custom 5237904005509684537438.72%
custom 5456433487718390163377.51%
custom 5775916214874281431326.49%
😁255.07%
❤‍🔥61.22%
🤣20.406%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 493reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Atenov_D. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC259 views46 reactions6 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Есть ли жизнь после бана в Х? > 24 июля я получил бан за "неаутентичное поведение". Вчера вечером меня разблокировали после пятой апелляции. По ощущениям - это достаточно тяжело, когда спустя полтора года ежедневной работы, эту работу резко забирают. Никому не советую. Еще в день блокировки для себя решил, что вернусь сюда в канал только после того, как получу разбан. По этому хочу поделиться с вами теми мыслями,

🔥30❤‍🔥65custom 57759162148742814313custom 52379040055096845372

26 Jul 2026, 20:12 UTC318 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @atlantisdreams

Полное руководство по X (Twitter) в нише Polymarket Привет, дорогой друг! 🍪 Это обещанное руководство по прокачке вашего X(Twitter) аккаунта в нише Polymarket c полного нуля. Мы специально постарались сделать информацию, как можно проще, но углублённее, чтобы человек из любой сферы, вне зависимости от скилла, мог ознакомиться с ней и попробовать себя в этом. Наша задача радовать вас и строить ради культуры. Приятно

4🔥4custom 57759162148742814311

18 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC983 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

+$169 с монетизации Х за последние 2 недели. > 1.1M Impressions за две недели. И хоть по охватам результат примерно как в прошлый раз, выплата на $45 выше. Вообще у многих заметил, что этот месяц выдался прибыльнее. Перераспределил ресурсы реплаев на небольших авторов. Это повысило мой Engagements, как мне кажется, за место фейковых охватов с реплаев. Сделал всего одну статью, которая набрала 230k в большей степе

13🔥6custom 57759162148742814315

16 Jul 2026, 18:58 UTC835 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

> Тогда как лучше вообще работать, если эти обе крайности - зло? Вполне простой и логичный ответ - не уходить в крайности и находится по середине. Это точно сложнее, но в этом и кроется секрет работы. Нужно создавать контент, который будет байтить аудиторию и вызывать эмоцию, но местами и давать пользу. - Качественный контент - это хорошо, но аудиторию им набрать очень сложно. - Байтовый контент - тоже хорошо, но

10🔥2custom 57759162148742814312

16 Jul 2026, 18:57 UTC606 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

/ И как бы оно не было, но большинство тех, кто сейчас загоняет фермы в Х как в лучшие времена тестнетов, получит уж точно не тот профит на который надеется. Те, кто загонял фермы условные пол года назад - профит иметь будут сейчас и, скорее всего, потом, хоть и меньше. Но конкуренция среди таких "авторов" без личного бренда и индивидуальности будет кратно расти, а значит, по правилам рыночной экономики, будет полу

4🔥3custom 57759162148742814312

16 Jul 2026, 18:57 UTC574 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Уход в крайности убивает твой рост в Х. Последнее время я замечаю у многих деление на два радикальных лагеря: адепты секты качественного контента и фанаты ферм-тикток-AI-аккаунтов. > В чем проблема первого лагеря? Качественный контент - штука хорошая, но это буквально гонение себя в рамки. Примеры аккаунтов, которые выросли на "качественном и правильном контенте" есть, но это буквально единицы и ориентироваться на

4🔥2custom 52379040055096845372

11 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC798 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

До последнего откладывал идею изучения n8n и зря! Всего один день вместе с Codex и у меня наконец то настроеный пайплайн для создания определенного вида контента. Буквально за 1 минуту пайплайн создал пост в нужном мне стиле и с нужным вложением, когда ранее руками на это ушло бы минут 25. Я задаю тему+кол-во символов и через 1~ минутy получаю готовый пост в тг. Так еще дополнительно помимо ютуба ищет материал в

13custom 52379040055096845374🔥3

10 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC680 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

> Когда шел спать, на посте было 2-3к views > Когда проснулся, на посте 400k views Я все чаще начинаю замечать, что основные охваты пост получает именно ночью. Мой аккаунт настолько сильно повернут на US аудиторию? Или от чего это зависит? Atenov TG | Atenov X | Взаимная активность в Х

15🔥7custom 57759162148742814314

8 Jul 2026, 20:16 UTC606 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вчера слегка залудился и потерял $120 на маркете с Роналду на Polymarket Сегодня утром Wallchain подкинул мне оффер на ровно ту же сумму. Прайс, конечно, слабоватый, но приму за знак и способ вернуть то, что пролудил Atenov TG | Atenov X | Взаимная активность в Х

🔥105custom 57759162148742814313

6 Jul 2026, 21:47 UTC751 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

+123$ за последние 2 недели с X монетизации. Не очень большие деньги, но уже присутствует небольшой рост с прошлой выплаты. > Что я для себя отметил/закрепил? - Нужен больший фокус на длинных постах/статьях. Для себя выделил крутую стратегию для пуша статей, возможно, скоро расскажу о ней. - У меня есть рубрика, где я публикую халяву/обходы для ИИ. Последнюю неделю начала делать видео минимум 35+ секунд, ближе к

8🔥6custom 57759162148742814312

3 Jul 2026, 18:15 UTC≈1,510 views59 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сколько я заработал со своего аккаунта X за июнь? Вы набрали столько реакций, что я даже немного офигел. Ни разу столько не набирали. Значит точно интересная тема. - В июне был абсолютный high по количеству платных интеграций на аккаунте. Даже англоязычный тгк смог принести $110 в копилку. - Было две выплаты по коллабам в ZSCDAO - Первая выплата по монетизации от Х тоже достаточно приятно принесла денег. >>>> Tota

29🔥16custom 577591621487428143110custom 52379040055096845374

1 Jul 2026, 16:05 UTC822 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Чуть выше писал про личного спортивного тренера - бота. Наконец могу назвать его готовым, чуть ниже перечислю что он вообще умеет. 🍺 Хоть он и готов, но в нем все еще могут присутствовать баги или неточности. Если вы такие найдете - я буду очень благодарен за фидбек - @ThomasShelbyTC link: https://t.me/WorkoutCoreBot link: https://t.me/WorkoutCoreBot link: https://t.me/WorkoutCoreBot Список возможностей: - Полная

13🔥4custom 52379040055096845373

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Atenov_D. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 386,289 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Atenov_D × Общество ликвидированных” (@Atenov_D), 847 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Atenov_D.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.