Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for الفوائد العلمية للطريفي

Channel

الفوائد العلمية للطريفي

@Atarefe0

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,453subscribers

+108 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002014290272
TypeChannel
Username@Atarefe0
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Atarefe0

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,3432,4642,403.59 August 2026 — 2,345 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,345 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,343 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,402 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,412 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,417 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,423 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,417 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,456 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,464 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,463 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,461 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,456 subscribers17 September 2026 — 2,459 subscribers25 September 2026 — 2,453 subscribers2,4539 August 202625 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 47 days, net +108. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,325–2,482 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 19:182,453-6
17 Sept 2026, 13:552,459+3
13 Sept 2026, 11:182,456-5
9 Sept 2026, 11:582,461-2
4 Sept 2026, 10:392,463-1
31 Aug 2026, 18:362,464+8
28 Aug 2026, 14:022,456+39
25 Aug 2026, 17:232,417-6
22 Aug 2026, 20:172,423+6
19 Aug 2026, 19:462,417+5
16 Aug 2026, 20:552,412+10
13 Aug 2026, 16:482,402+59
10 Aug 2026, 09:532,343-2
9 Aug 2026, 11:302,345no change
9 Aug 2026, 11:182,345first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

271 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤24690.8%
💯248.86%
👌10.369%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 271 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC157 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

تفسير إبراهيم النخعي المنقول عن ابن مسعود صحيحٌ إذا صح إليه السند، وغالِبُه صحيح.

❤7💯1

7 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC215 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

يحيى بن معين يُقدِّم تفسير سعيد بن أبي عَروبة عن قتادة، على تفسير شيبان عن قتادة.

❤9💯1

6 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC271 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

جاء ذكر المنارة في السنة من حديث أبي برزة قال: (من السنة الأذان في المنارة والإقامة في المسجد) ولكنه لا يثبت، وصحَّ عن عبدالله بن شقيق من قوله؛ كما في مصنف ابن أبي شيبة.

❤8💯1

5 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC380 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026

شيوخ الطبراني يُحملون على العدالة والثقة من جهة الإجمال، إلا أن المتون الثقيلة التي يتفردون بها لا تُقبل إلا بالأسانيد العالية والحُفَّاظ الكبار.

❤14💯1

4 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC461 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026

قتادة لم يرو عن أحد من الصحابة إلا عن أنس سماعاً؛ كما قاله أحمد، وصحح سماعه من ابن سَرْجَس أبو زرعة، وصحح سماعه من أبي الطفيل ابنُ المديني.

❤17💯1

3 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC530 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026

أذان النساء للجماعات وفي المساجد لم يرد في السنة، ولم يكن من عمل السلف فكان من البدع المحدثات، وأما أذانها لنفسها في بيتها فقد رخص فيه.

❤19💯1

2 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC579 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

الأمور والأحكام المستقرة في الشريعة لا تتداعى الهمم على نقلها.

❤11💯1

1 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC680 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026

إذا أطلق النسائي على الراوي قوله: (ليس بالقوي) فيعني أن فيه ضعفاً ولا يعني بها جرحاً شديداً ولا ضعفاً مفسداً.

❤19👌1💯1

31 Jul 2026, 18:26 UTC731 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026

عبد الوهاب بن عطاء فيه ضعف، وإن أخرج له مسلم في صحيحه؛ فإنه انتقى من حديثه ما رواه عن سعيد بن أبي عروبة خاصة لملازمته وصحبته له مع كثرة شيوخه.

❤14💯1

30 Jul 2026, 20:20 UTC786 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026

إذا روى الإمام مالك عن أحد من الرواة أو روى عن أحد يروي عن أحد، فينبغي أن يحسن بهم الظن لا سيما إذا كانوا مدنيين؛ لأنه موغلٌ في معرفة المدنيين.

❤16💯2

29 Jul 2026, 16:42 UTC805 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

لا يوجد أحدٌ من النقاد تعرض لحديث البحر (هو الطهور ماؤه، الحل ميتته) هيبة له وهيبة للإمام مالك؛ ولهذا لما روى الإمام مالك حديث الهرة وفيه مجاهيل، قال البخاري: جَوَّد مالكٌ إسناده.

❤15💯1

28 Jul 2026, 16:45 UTC798 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

الأحاديث التي تتسلسل بالمدنيين ينبغي أن تكون لها هيبة؛ لأن رقة الديانة ما كانت في تلك الطبقة التي قبل الإمام مالك عليه رحمة الله.

❤15💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Atarefe0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

درر الشيخ الطريفي
@Altarefedrr · 45,798
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
💎دُرَرُ الطَّريفِي💎
@drr_altarefe · 29,233
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
عبدالعزيز الطريفي
@abdulazizatarefe · 59,131
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026
من أقوال أبن تيمية وأبن القيم
@thamar4 · 57,876
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“الفوائد العلمية للطريفي” (@Atarefe0), 2,453 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Atarefe0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.