Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
57 measurements spanning 90 days, net +581. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,912–11,738 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 12:39
11,643
+37
4 Nov 2026, 10:17
11,606
+6
3 Nov 2026, 13:36
11,600
+17
2 Nov 2026, 10:28
11,583
+80
1 Nov 2026, 12:06
11,503
+143
31 Oct 2026, 11:45
11,360
+16
30 Oct 2026, 11:29
11,344
+14
29 Oct 2026, 11:51
11,330
+111
28 Oct 2026, 13:18
11,219
+4
27 Oct 2026, 12:14
11,215
-8
26 Oct 2026, 14:55
11,223
+3
25 Oct 2026, 14:40
11,220
+26
24 Oct 2026, 14:36
11,194
+5
23 Oct 2026, 13:28
11,189
-2
22 Oct 2026, 14:05
11,191
-4
21 Oct 2026, 04:49
11,195
-8
20 Oct 2026, 05:36
11,203
-3
19 Oct 2026, 02:18
11,206
-5
18 Oct 2026, 01:09
11,211
-2
17 Oct 2026, 02:46
11,213
first reading
Engagement
156 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.27%
avg views ÷ 11,643 subscribers
Avg views / post
381
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
43
of 156 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
156 (3 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
16,390
Reactions total
662
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 19:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈10,600
Videos
≈68
Links
≈166
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
2,259 reactions across 156 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,767
78.2%
👏
222
9.83%
👍
110
4.87%
🥰
97
4.29%
👌
18
0.797%
💔
16
0.708%
😢
14
0.62%
❤🔥
12
0.531%
🔥
3
0.133%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 156 of the 156 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,259 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 156 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 43 posts held from the last 30 days (2.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
لا أحد يبقى على القمَّة ولا أحد يبقى في القاع، وإنَّما هي دُنيا لا دوامَ لها، وأيَّامٌ يداولُها الخالقُ بينَ النَّاسِ ليجري بها العبرة، فالزموا الصَّفَ يا عرب، والزموا الصَّفَ يا مسلمون واتَّحدوا على كلمةٍ واحدةٍ، وواجهوا الأزمةَ بكرامةٍ ولا تركنوا إلى الذين ظلموا فتهلكُوا معهم.
إنَّهُ الاختبار.. وكل دُنيانا اختبار.. ولن تنفعَكم أموالكم، ولن تدومَ لكم كراسيكم، ولن يسلمَ في السَّاعةِ الخافضةِ الرَّافعةِ إلَّا الثابتون…
آه يا غـ.ـزَّة كم يحرق قلوبنا ألمكِ
ويُحزِنُ أرواحنا وجعكِ
يا ربّ ليس لهم إلَّاكَ، وأنتَ نِعمَ المُعين
ربّ أطعِمهم واسقِهم وآمنهم يا قدير..
#رغد_أنس
#براءةُ_قلم
في قوله: «قَدْ نَرَىٰ تَقَلُّبَ وَجْهِكَ فِي السَّمَاءِ».
والذي يستفاد من هذه الآية: استحباب النظر إلى السماء عند الدعاء في غير الصلاة، وهذا من السنن المهجورة، وكان النبي إذا دعا نظر إلى السماء.
كتاب #التفسير_والبيان لـ #عبد_العزيز_الطريفي
عن يُسَيرة رضِيَ اللَّـه عنها -وكانت مِن المُهاجراتِ- قالت: قال رسول اللَّـه ﷺ: «عليكُنَّ بالتسبيحِ، والتهليلِ، والتقديسِ، واعقِدنَ بالأنامل، فإنَّهُنَّ مسؤولاتٌ مُستنطَقاتٌ، ولا تغفُلنَ، فتنسَينَ الرحمة» رواه أحمد وأبو داود، وحسَّنه الألبانيّ.
#زِدْنِى_عِلْمًۭا
امضِ في طريقِ المعرفة، اسلُكْ دربَ الحكمة، تقدَّمْ إلى الغاية، لا تلتفتْ ولو التفتَ القلب، إذا كانتِ النُّجومُ في انتظارِكَ فلماذا تُطيلُ التَّحديقَ في القاع؟! إذا كانتِ السَّماءُ تمدُّ ذراعَيها لكَ فلماذا تخلدُ إلى الأرض؟! الآن بدأتَ الطَّريقَ إلى الله.
#أنا_يوسف
#أيمن_العتوم
❤12❤🔥1👍1👏1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 156 posts we hold for @AskbookRead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@AskbookRead edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
أقوال من ذهب✍ @Thamar21 · 44,159 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اقرَأ” (@AskbookRead), 11,643 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AskbookRead.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.