Ashton Forbes (Twitter) We are going to call the quantum internet, the ‘Aethernet.’ It’s gonna be great. There will be no lag. https://twitter.com/amazing_physics/status/1978078036831428681#m More at @MuhRobotBro

Channel
Ashton Forbes
@AshtonForbes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
45subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002340652637 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AshtonForbes |
| Description | Ashton Forbes automated pull from X. Post +repost https://t.me/ZeroPointEnergyChat |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AshtonForbes |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 45 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 45 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 13 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,400
- Videos
- ≈1,380
- Links
- ≈3,310
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4m 27s
- Average length
- 1m 07s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 1 | 16.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2025 to 15 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Ashton Forbes (Twitter) Smart strategy. Instant death is a powerful deterrent. https://twitter.com/nicksortor/status/1978156847883313392#m More at @MuhRobotBro
😁1
Ashton Forbes (Twitter) Excellent. I love geofencing. One step closer to full Digital IDs. Deanonymizing the internet will reduce bots and make it a more civilized place. https://twitter.com/nikitabier/status/1978132382868988310#m More at @MuhRobotBro
Ashton Forbes (Twitter) Ian’s petulant crash out is what happens when you start believing your own clickbait due to being ideologically captured by your audience. Israel derangement syndrome is the new flat earth. More at @MuhRobotBro
Ashton Forbes (Twitter) RT @bennyjohnson: Happy Birthday Charlie. Still looking up to you. What’s Heaven like, man? More at @MuhRobotBro
Ashton Forbes (Twitter) I'm switching sides. I support Palantir now. Digital ID tag all these primitives up. Some of yall need to be tracked. I want to be on the side of the people with AGI, real time monitoring of the entire planet, replicators, and fusion energy. https://twitter.com/JustXAshton/status/1923204386013983200#m More at @MuhRobotBro
🤡1
Ashton Forbes (Twitter) Infinite Energy - Aneutronic Fusion https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1OdJrOwyPEVxX More at @MuhRobotBro
Ashton Forbes (Twitter) The path forward has been illuminated and it is Aneutronic Fusion. Unlimited green energy for the world. Plus, Candace & the Candi Cultees crash out while Trump earns a Nobel Peace Prize. Breaking the laws of physics LIVE at 7pm Central. youtube.com/live/tH4xwUc5Qs4 More at @MuhRobotBro
Ashton Forbes (Twitter) Mass is energy. Mass bends spacetime causing the effect we know as gravity. So by equivalence, a large amount of condensed energy can also bend spacetime. We can also create elements like hydrogen. Energy (light) into mass. https://twitter.com/Rainmaker1973/status/1977733561643114720#m More at @MuhRobotBro
❤1
Ashton Forbes (Twitter) If you know, you know... https://twitter.com/GuntherEagleman/status/1977833996425015772#m More at @MuhRobotBro
Ashton Forbes (Twitter) Dear @JTLonsdale, I apologize for being rude to you. I got sucked in to woke right narratives. I now realize humans are too primitive to be given carte blanche access to unlimited energy. I just want to help advance fusion technology. Sincerely, -Ashton Forbes More at @MuhRobotBro
Ashton Forbes (Twitter) RT @ArynneWexler: Israel Derangement Syndrome on the right is the same as the Trump Derangement Syndrome on the left So gay More at @MuhRobotBro
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @AshtonForbes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 334,256 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ashton Forbes” (@AshtonForbes), 45 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AshtonForbes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.