Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

АСАД БАГИРОВ Человек слова. Публичные выступления, ораторское мастерство, продажи со сцены, психология

@AsadBagirov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,167subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001388909732
TypeChannel
Username@AsadBagirov
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AsadBagirov

Growth

1,1661,1671,166.57 August 2026 — 1,166 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,166 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,167 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,166–1,167 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 12:451,167+1
7 Aug 2026, 05:201,166no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:161,166first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.25%
avg views ÷ 1,167 subscribers
Avg views / post
96.3
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held17 (21 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,540
Reactions total105
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

105 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3331.4%
🔥2120.0%
👍1514.3%
😁98.57%
🙏98.57%
💯76.67%
32.86%
21.90%
🏆21.90%
🤔21.90%
👏10.952%
🤝10.952%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AsadBagirov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC44 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Прошло две недели с момента старта программы группового наставничества «Мастер влияния». Некоторые результаты участников: - получила нужный контакт человека из правительства - получила проценты за продажу, хотя до этого даже не знала как назвать цену - в поликлинике тесть получил нужное назначение к нужному врачу и без копейки денег - взлетел рилз на 250 тысяч просмотров, хотя уже долго не залетали. А еще внутренн

111🔥1🙏1

3 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC66 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Эффект «правила трёх» Всё, что больше трёх, для мозга шум. Всё, что три и меньше, сигнал. Почему тройка — это магия: Три создаёт ритм. Три даёт завершённость. Три легко повторить. А значит, вашу идею перескажут другим. Как перевести любой список в тройку: ❌Было: «Наш курс поможет улучшить дикцию, убрать зажимы, поставить дыхание, развить харизму, работать со взглядом... ✅Стало: «Вы зазвучите увереннее. Зал начнё

👍31🔥1🤔1🙏1

1 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC92 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Меланхолии пост Первый день последнего месяца лета. Он всегда ассоциировался у меня с грустью. Ведь август он вроде и летний месяц, но дни чуть короче, ночи длиннее, и уже не так жарко. Но самое главное, за ним нет другого летнего месяца. Сразу, без прелюдий, школа. Прелюдия в августе. Уже чаще мелькают те, кто уезжал в лагеря или на юга (хотя южнее моей республики в Союзе не было). Уже нужно идти получать учебники.

6👍21🔥1🤔1🙏1

30 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC92 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если вы хотите, чтобы ваше выступление забыли уже через 5 минут, то не читайте этот пост. До конца. Почему некоторые выступления забываются почти сразу? Был нарушен баланс: - у выступления не было каркаса. Оно было живым, но бесформенным. Как желе. - наоборот. Сухое, схематичное. Как инструкция к пылесосу. Всё по делу, но скучно до зевоты. Это выступление с каркасом, но без кожи. В чём разница: Каркас — это логика

🔥21👍1🙏1

30 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC91 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ха, вражеский фейсбук показал дружественную картину: мой первый тренинг по ораторскому искусству. Я студент. Как сейчас помню, это было на проспекте Мира. Тренинг платный, состав смешанный, однокурсники плюс люди со стороны. Именно сторонний участник, узнав, что это мой дебют, чуть не выпал в осадок: «Если это первый, боюсь представить, какие будут последующие!» Как в воду глядел. Краткая зарисовка: До начала тренин

2👍2😁2💯1🙏1

29 Jul 2026, 06:31 UTC100 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вспышки на Солнце? Как вы думаете, в этом есть какой-то смысл? Поделитесь в комментариях

🔥3😁2

28 Jul 2026, 18:54 UTC103 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Беззастенчиво делюсь результатами участников группового наставничества «Мастер влияния». Страна должна знать своих героев и гордиться ими. Это я не про себя. Хотя…

2🏆1👍1🔥1🤝1

28 Jul 2026, 07:40 UTC112 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

С трудом, но у меня получилось пост- визитку дооформить. Но это ужас, ссылки не вставляются, или предложения не редактируются. В общем, с тг не соскучишься☝️

👏1💯1🔥1😁1

28 Jul 2026, 07:38 UTCviews —

АСАД БАГИРОВ Человек слова. Публичные выступления, ораторское мастерство, продажи со сцены, психология pinned a photo

28 Jul 2026, 07:38 UTC103 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

‼️Давайте знакомиться Меня зовут Асад Багиров. Я — наставник по публичным выступлениям, ораторскому искусству и продающим коммуникациям Я помогаю экспертам помогающих профессий, лидерам, предпринимателям и представителям бизнеса превратить их знания и опыт в уверенную, влиятельную речь, которая убеждает и продает. 🔥 Спикер - наставник и член Ассоциации спикеров СНГ (CISSA) Радислава Гандапаса ⠀ 🔥 Топ-5 русскоязычн

4🔥3👍2🏆1💯1

27 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC87 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я как писатель кончился. И начался теперь как продвиженец. Это другая роль, если угодно, субличность. И даже, другая личность. И есть две стратегии: сидеть и ждать, когда меня великого заметят и пригласят, и другая, создать эту возможность самому. Создать условия для этой возможности. Первая про инфантилизм и розовые слоники, (и жертвы тоже, кстати). Вторая про взрослость, читай, проактивность, лидерство, уверенност

3💯1🔥1🙏1

25 Jul 2026, 11:37 UTC110 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Импровизация и креативность в речи. Что, где, почем? Спонтанная речь. Умение рождать мысль в моменте, опираясь на контекст. Мышление. Тренировка спонтанной речи развивает нейронные связи. Бизнес. С новым нейроузором мозг начинает быстрее находить решения и в бизнесе Переговоры. Партнёр выдвинул условие, которого не было в договоре. Вместо «я не знаю» вы выдаёте вариант. Потому что ваш мозг привык искать, а не зави

🔥21🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @AsadBagirov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 458,163 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“АСАД БАГИРОВ Человек слова. Публичные выступления, ораторское мастерство, продажи со сцены, психология” (@AsadBagirov), 1,167 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AsadBagirov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.