Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 30 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 361–368 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Oct 2026, 21:22
362
no change
9 Oct 2026, 00:17
362
-3
29 Sept 2026, 00:22
365
-1
14 Sept 2026, 05:58
366
-1
12 Sept 2026, 21:17
367
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 362 subscribers
Avg views / post
54.6
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026
Posts held
20 (24 July 2024 – 12 October 2026)
Views total
491
Reactions total
21
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Oct 2026, 21:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
2
Links
1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
65 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
54
83.1%
😁
4
6.15%
⚡
3
4.62%
🔥
3
4.62%
🤩
1
1.54%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2024 to 12 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#cooking
Science in the Kitchen: Cooking🍽
Cooking has long been a practical skill passed down through generations. However, some traditional methods do not produce the results people expect. Today, chefs are collaborating with scientists to investigate the chemistry and physics behind food preparation, challenging established beliefs and discovering new culinary possibilities
📰@article_up
#mind
How Play Shapes Creative Minds? 🧠
Play is often regarded as a pleasant distraction from serious learning. Yet some of the most important intellectual breakthroughs have emerged from activities that resemble play: experimenting, testing possibilities, making mistakes and following curiosity.
📰 @article_up
#health
Intermittent Fasting: Is It Still Relevant?🥗
Intermittent fasting has attracted considerable attention among people seeking to manage their weight and improve their eating habits. Unlike conventional diets, which tend to focus on what people eat, intermittent fasting places greater emphasis on when they eat.
📰@article_up
#science
What Makes a Mind? 🧠
We usually think of the mind as something that belongs to a brain. We make decisions, resist temptation, remember past experiences and pursue goals, so it seems natural to assume that these abilities require a nervous system.
📰 @article_up
#health
Why Exercise Does Not Always Lead to Weight Loss
Exercise is widely associated with weight loss. The logic seems straightforward: if physical activity makes the body burn more calories, then increasing exercise should create a larger energy deficit and, consequently, reduce body weight. Yet human biology is more complicated than this simple calculation suggests.
📰 @article_up
Channel map 🗺️
ARTICLES📃
Understanding anxiety disorders
Why do we sleep
What is love
Pros and cons of AI
The benefits of Gossip
Why do we sweat
Misunderstood introversion
How to deal with passive-agressive behaviour
Why is math important
The advantages of Left-handedness
Philosophy
The benefits of eating meat
Crime
Should We Eat Sugar
AI Art: The end or start of creativity
Smoking
Social Anxiety
…
#psychology
Social Anxiety
The cognitive feelings of dread in anticipation of some bad outcome, and physical sensations such as jitteriness and a racing heart are designed for discomfort. Anxiety is meant to capture attention and stimulate you to make necessary changes to protect what you care about.
📰@article_up
#health
Smoking
Smoking behaviour is maintained primarily by the positive and negative reinforcing properties of nicotine delivered rapidly in a way that is affordable and palatable, with the negative health consequences mostly being sufficiently uncertain and distant in time not to create sufficient immediate concern to deter the behaviour.
📰@article_up
❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Article_up. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
2026 PDF DEPOSU @yks_kpss_pdf_kanalii · 27,935 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Article | UP” (@Article_up), 362 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Article_up.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.