Channel
@Arteficial_Intelligence2022
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
489subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001401323292 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Arteficial_Intelligence2022 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Arteficial_Intelligence2022 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:42 | 489 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:41 | 486 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 486 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (25 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,085 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 23:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
KI - DIE LETZTE ERFINDUNG Folge-1 👉📽👀https://www.zdf.de/video/dokus/zdfinfo-die-gefaehrlichsten-firmen-der-welt-big-tech-100/zdfinfo-die-gefaehrlichsten-firmen-der-welt-big-tech-der-aufstieg-der-datenkraken-100 Folge-2 👉📽👀https://www.zdf.de/video/dokus/zdfinfo-die-gefaehrlichsten-firmen-der-welt-big-tech-100/zdfinfo-die-gefaehrlichsten-firmen-der-welt-big-tech-milliarden-manipulation-macht-100
Ukrainer Terminator? Also humanoide Kampfroboter Sci-Fi oder bald Realität? 00:00 - Einleitung: Kampfroboter in der Ukraine 00:41 - Was steckt hinter humanoide Roboter? 02:22 - Stand der Technik: Science-Fiction vs. Realität 03:52 - Vorteile humanoider Roboter im Feld 05:22 - Debatte um autonome Waffen und Ethik 07:41 - Airbikes & fliegende Buggies 11:03 - Bodendrohnen (UGVs) im strategischen Einsatz 12:11 - Weltpr…
💻👁👹 Das 666-Beast System des Tieres was vor über 2000 Jahren vorhergesagt wurde, wird nun immer mehr Realität.(Offb13:16-18) Was noch vor einigen Jahren Science Fiction war, ist Heute bereits technologisch und mit (GAI) KI easy machbar. Das ist ein weiterer ein Grund warum der Maranatha-Event sich in nicht allzu ferner Zukunft ereignen könnte?! #Maranatha #AIBeastTech 💦mittelDlandtv
Unser Leben mit KI: Nie wieder Stau! https://www.zdf.de/play/dokus/collection-index-page-ard-collection-ard-dxjuomfyzdpzag93omizyjc4zgzlnza5mguxodi-174/page-video-ard-unser-leben-mit-ki-nie-wieder-stau-100?q=leben+mit+Einer+ki
Watch Live TV, Movies, and TV Shows Free Online https://watch.plex.tv/en-GB/watch/movie/ai-the-final-countdown-2019?uri=provider%3A%2F%2Ftv.plex.provider.vod%2Flibrary%2Fmetadata%2F5f4092a402101b004004ce57
Der ganze Text: DARPA sucht nach Technologien zur Entwicklung neuer, nicht-natürlicher chemischer Marker sowie nach molekularen Mechanismen zum "Schreiben" und "Löschen" dieser Marker. Darüber hinaus sind sie überhaupt nicht an herkömmlichen, natürlichen Mechanismen wie der Methylierung interessiert. Sie wollen ein völlig neues, künstliches chemisches Alphabet. Warum? Die Antwort finden Sie im Abschnitt "Überblick"…
DARPA entwickelt künstliche chemische Marker, um Gene vorübergehend zu verändern – etwa um Angst, Müdigkeit oder Schmerz auszuschalten und gleichzeitig Resistenzen zu stärken. Diese Marker sind nicht natürlich, um sie vor genetischen Tests zu verbergen. Sie wollen ein völlig neues, künstliches chemisches Alphabet. Im Abschnitt "Überblick", wo das Militär seine Ziele beschreibt: "Verbesserung der kognitiven Fähigke…
🇺🇸The heads of the ABC, SBS, Nine and News Corp say AI companies should strike licensing deals rather than freely train on Australian news, warning journalism is a public good that must be protected. 🇩🇪 Experten und die Journalistengewerkschaft haben die Pläne der ABC zum verantwortungsvollen Einsatz von künstlicher Intelligenz begrüßt, aber gewarnt, dass Missbrauch das Vertrauen in den öffentlich-rechtlichen Sender…
👽🇷🇺 Russian scientists develop breakthrough AI tool to treat skin disease The new AI-powered diagnostic support system is designed to help doctors monitor the development and spread of vitiligo through detailed skin image analysis. 🔸 The system detects changes in pigmentation over time 🔸 It identifies affected areas, measures their size, and compares results with earlier scans to track disease progression 🔸 The t…
🎞Transcendence Trailer KI - BEST OF!! Mega krasser Film über Super Power KI und Mindupload! https://youtube.com/watch?v=OReAfCPJzS4&si=uWZo1_a_YMd_19kC Dr. Will Caster (Johnny Depp) ist der führende Forscher im Bereich künstlicher Intelligenz. Anders als Wissenschaftlern zuvor gelingt es ihm, nicht nur das kollektive menschliche Wissen in Maschinen zu übertragen, sondern diese auch mit menschlichen Emotionen auszus…
📽 Film Tipps Rasanter KI Hightech M@vie mit atemberaubende Future Tech und spannende Aktion bis zum Ende! Trailer 🎞 Alita: Battle Angel https://youtube.com/watch?v=zZm9bsGldmw&si=yU8mAA3qeRB4iUcA Als Alita ohne jede Erinnerung daran, wer sie ist, in einer fremden Welt der Zukunft erwacht, wird sie von Ido aufgenommen. Der mitfühlende Arzt erkennt, dass sich hinter der leeren Cyborg-Hülle das Herz und die Seele ein…
Zum Thema: The first digital DNA Hard Dive!! https://t.me/ImZeichenDerEndzeit/16117?comment=48385
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Arteficial_Intelligence2022. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 405,573 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Artificial Intelligence / KI |AC Tech | Quantum Tech| DARPA| Antichrist Technologie | Singularity | Transhumanism” (@Arteficial_Intelligence2022), 489 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Arteficial_Intelligence2022.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.