Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Art of Lies

Channel

Art of Lies

@Art_of_Lies

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,482subscribers

+25 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001318639966
TypeChannel
Username@Art_of_Lies
Created17 October 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Art_of_Lies

Growth

2,4572,4822,469.56 August 2026 — 2,457 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,457 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,467 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,477 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,482 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,453–2,486 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 03:562,482+5
12 Aug 2026, 22:132,477+10
10 Aug 2026, 01:272,467+10
6 Aug 2026, 14:462,457no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:382,457first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.2%
avg views ÷ 2,482 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held25 (31 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total25,555
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC441 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📚 بدون شرح. به زودی. 🔺 و قراره ویدیوی جامعی باشه در مورد آشنایی با خدایان یونان

7 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC500 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔰 اگه قرار بود خادم یکی از خدایان یونان باشید چه کسی رو انتخاب می کردید؟ 📚 فقط یک خدا. همراه با دلیل 📚 جز خود اون فرد. شرایط زندگی در کنارش هم ملاکه. 📚 فقط 12 المپی منظورم نیست. کلا خدایان. @Art_of_lies

6 Aug 2026, 20:54 UTC728 viewsread 7 August 2026

📚 فردا با ویدیوی پرسش و پاسخ با حامیان مالی همراه شما هستیم 🔺 اگه کسی هنوز این پست رو ندیده و فرصت نکرده بفرسته نیازی به نگرانی نیست. برای جبران محبت شما عزیزان باز هم این ویدیوها رو می سازیم ❤️

6 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC809 viewsread 7 August 2026

📚 به صورت خیلی تصادفی دیدم یکی از دوستان داره پیام های من و شما عزیزان رو توی کانال خودش در ابعاد گسترده سیو می کنه. امیدوارم که نیتش خیر باشه. ولی خب اگه نباشه. جا داشت بگم. @Art_of_lies

6 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC852 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📚 یکی از متعفن ترین کتاب هایی که توی زندگیم خوندم. معمولا به کتابی حمله نمی کنم. ولی نه این تیکه کاغذ رو کتاب می دونم نه نویسنده این اثر رو هم صنف خودم. یک مشت افکار روان پریش، دستور العمل های ضدانسانی، رویافروشی و حرف مفت. 📚 بدبخت اون جوونی که این کتاب رو جدی بگیره. @Art_of_lies

5 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔰 نقاشی های مهرنوش بادپر 📚 در هزار سال اخیر "هیچ" چیز به اندازه اینترنت در تغییر مثبت فرهنگ مردم ایران موثر نبود. 📚 یکی از دلایلش این بود که "نمی دونستیم" یک بخش عادی از زندگی خودمون "غیرعادیه" برای اکثر جهان و تازه فهمیدیم که "مجبور نیستیم" طبق یک سری اصول رفتار کنیم صرفا چون قدیمی هستند. 📚 دیدن زشتی ها و پذیرفتن اون ها نقطه 0 تغییره. کاری غرب چندین قرن از ما جلوتر در انجام دادنش. چندین هزاره اصلا. 📚 وقتی "رفتار

5 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC923 viewsread 7 August 2026

📚 اینترنت در یک ابعاد شبه-تروریستی بد عمل می کنه. به شکلی که دانلود کردن عکس برای ویدیوی شورت به مشکل خورده ...

4 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC947 viewsread 7 August 2026

❤️ساعت های که "خودتون" باهاش راحت هستید رو انتخاب کنید. تنها معیارتون "خودتون" باشه :))

4 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC950 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

بهترین ساعت برای انتشار ویدیوهای گمانه سرا

  1. 10 صبح تا 1213%
  2. 12 تا 2 ظهر10%
  3. 2 تا 4 عصر11%
  4. 4 تا 6 عصر20%
  5. 7:30 (همینی که هست)49%
  6. 8 شب30%
  7. 10 شب26%

The shares total 159%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC914 viewsread 7 August 2026

📚 مشکل از یوتیوبه یا علاقه ای ندارید به ویدیو :)) قلبم شکست

4 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC920 viewsread 7 August 2026

📚 بسیاری از مردم عقاید سیاسی افراطی را نه به این دلیل انتخاب می‌کنند که واقعاً خواهان اجرای آن سیاست‌ها هستند، بلکه برای این‌که تعلق و وفاداری خود را به گروهی که به آن وابسته‌اند به نمایش بگذارند 📚 The main reason people hold extreme political views is not that they want to bring about extreme policies, but that they want to signal their loyalty to their group. - برایان کاپلان @Art_of_lies

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @Art_of_Lies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTCAnonymous Poll412 voters

بهترین ساعت برای انتشار ویدیوهای گمانه سرا

  1. 10 صبح تا 1213%
  2. 12 تا 2 ظهر10%
  3. 2 تا 4 عصر11%
  4. 4 تا 6 عصر20%
  5. 7:30 (همینی که هست)49%
  6. 8 شب30%
  7. 10 شب26%

The shares total 159%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 164,409 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Art of Lies” (@Art_of_Lies), 2,482 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Art_of_Lies.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.