Channel
@ArtFromRiwerrn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
39subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003553693659 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ArtFromRiwerrn |
| Description | Вся информация в закрепе 📌 ☆’ ﾟ･:*:･｡ RIWERRN ｡･:*:･ﾟ’☆ ✦ There will be ✦ • Fanarts (multifandom) • My Original Characters ✦ Main Fandoms ✦ ➤ Hannibal ➤ Supernatural Буст: https://t.me/boost/ArtFromRiwerrn |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 3 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ArtFromRiwerrn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 39 | no change |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 39 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 3 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
272 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐳 | 218 | 80.1% | |
| custom 5438523826281418872 | 28 | 10.3% | |
| 👻 | 26 | 9.56% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 272reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2026 to 19 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ArtFromRiwerrn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 February 2026 to 19 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
МИМИМИМИМИ, они такие милашечки ☆*:.｡.o(≧▽≦)o.｡.:*☆ Sammy lost his shoe o(TヘTo) He's literally a sad puppy ૮◞ ﻌ ◟ა А это Мяугам, инопланетяшка Изюма с отсылочкой на Сверхов и Сэмми "I lost my shoe" (o･ω･o) #Фанарт #Сверхи #СэмВинчестер #Гифт #МяугамИзюма
🐳23👻6
Тааак, фанаты Ганнибала, а ну-ка не отписываемся, ещё одна работка по Сверхам будет, потом по Вашему любому Ганнибалу что-нить забацаю (╥﹏╥)
🐳18
Уууух, давненько ничего не выкладывалось (*_ _)人 Но новые подписоты всё равно прибавляются (人´∇`) Ловите Сабриэлек (*≧∀≦)ﾉ ｡･:*:･ﾟ’☆ #Фанарт #Сверхи #Сабриэль #СэмВинчестер #Гейб
🐳26👻6
От лица Дина Винчестера поздравляю всех дам здесь находящихся с 8 марта!!! ζ°)))彡｡･:*:･ﾟ’☆ Кто, чёрт возьми, просто есть и делает этот мир... ну, не таким уж и дерьмовым? ВЫ!!! Будьте такими же сильными, такими же красивыми, такими же... Просто будьте собой И если кто-то вдруг посмеет Вас обидеть, то пусть попробует сначала разобраться с Дином! А потом с Сэмом! А потом с Касом! В общем, с праздником, дорогие мои …
🐳25👻13
Идём по трендам 2.0 Колледж АУ Версия с Сэмом и Энди Сэм от riwerrn 🐳👻🐳 Энди от кильки 🩺🩺🩺 #Коллаб #Фанарт #Сверхи #Сэмэнди #СэмВинчестер #Гейб
🐳19
Идём по трендам 1.0 Колледж АУ Версия с Сэмом и Гейбом Сэм от riwerrn 🐳👻🐳 Гейб от 1) ScissorsLady ✂️✂️✂️ 2) Тумалиски 🍓🍓🍓 #Коллаб #Фанарт #Сверхи #Сабриэль #СэмВинчестер #Гейб
🐳19
Ммм, экспериментирую с векторной графикой(?) 🐳🐳🐳 (Censored, потому что не получилось нормальные руки забацать 😓😓😓) ζ°)))彡｡･:*:･ﾟ’☆ Welkom in Europa blijf hier tot ik dood ga Euro-pa-pa, Euro-pa-pa — Joost Klein #Фанарт #Евровидение #ЙостКляйн
🐳16👻1
Потому вопрос к Вам: Какие фд вы бы НЕ были против видеть, если они будут появляться в канале? Будете ли также ставить реакты? (По желанию, в комментах можно конкретных персов из фд написать) (Мне правда важно мнение каждого здесь находящегося ^^)
The shares total 181%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🐳10
В-ТРЕТЬИХ, моя любимая подписота, обращаюсь к Вам Изначально планировался на канале мультифандом (то есть по совершенно разным фд, а их у меня дофига) Но по факту сейчас только «Ганнибал» тут есть (нууп, только один портрет Сэма тихонько плачет в сторонке, хехех), очевидно, потому что большинство пришли именно из Ганнибал кф, то есть я точно знаю, что Вам понравится
🐳11
ВО-ВТОРЫХ, кому-то тут вообще будут интересны мои собственные персы...? Ммм, знакомьтесь, это Битцель Основная инфа на фото Больше подробностей: • Он настолько агрессивно играет, что в конце выступления у него пальцы все в крови • Видите, у него ошейник(?) с красными шипами? Это не шипы, а медиаторы. Это он коллекционирует их, все принадлежали популярным немецким группам, по типу Рамштайн (Он их фанат, даап) (И да…
🐳17
‼️TW/CW: совсем немножко укусов/засосов/царапин (Уилл, тебя что, на дегустацию отдали? 🤭) ВО-ПЕРВЫХ, Will Graham «Autistic and ready to f^ck»✨✨✨ (На нём специально надета маска Ганни, ммм, ролевушка) #Фанарт #УиллГрэм #ГаннибалЛектер #Ганнибал
🐳23
Неужели это... новый пост? Не очень-то он похож на себя... Хью Дэнси/Уилл Грэмм #Фанарт #Ганнибал #УиллГрэм #ХьюДэнси
custom 543852382628141887228🐳11
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ArtFromRiwerrn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Потому вопрос к Вам: Какие фд вы бы НЕ были против видеть, если они будут появляться в канале? Будете ли также ставить реакты? (По желанию, в комментах можно конкретных персов из фд написать) (Мне правда важно мнение каждого здесь находящегося ^^)
The shares total 181%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2026 to 19 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 188,975 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“riwerrn’s art” (@ArtFromRiwerrn), 39 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ArtFromRiwerrn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.