Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Армянский Гвардиола

@Armenian_Guardiola

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

380subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001699085909
TypeChannel
Username@Armenian_Guardiola
Created20 September 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Armenian_Guardiola

Growth

3783803796 August 2026 — 378 subscribers6 August 2026 — 378 subscribers14 August 2026 — 380 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 378–380 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:59380+2
6 Aug 2026, 20:18378no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:59378first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
195.0%
avg views ÷ 380 subscribers
Avg views / post
741
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026
Posts held20 (9 June 202519 July 2026)
Views total2,964
Reactions total72
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

310 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17957.7%
👎3110.0%
💯289.03%
😁278.71%
🤮206.45%
💩72.26%
🤡72.26%
👍51.61%
😱20.645%
10.323%
🐳10.323%
👏10.323%
🔥10.323%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 310reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2025 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 22:53 UTC741 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Что за хуйню несет Губерниев? Просто клоун ебучий .. ты кто чтобы про Месси говорить. ? Ужас просто..

😁10💯81👎1

19 Jul 2026, 22:18 UTC752 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сколько команд сменили фанаты Роналду за этот чемпионат , чтобы порадоваться когда Месси проиграет 😂😂

😁9💯4

19 Jul 2026, 22:16 UTC735 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Просто посмотрите на Кубарси… блять просто невероятный футболист . 18 лет ..

131😱1

19 Jul 2026, 22:15 UTC736 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вы че распизделись все что финал говно? Вы футбол смотрите , или ебаный баскетбол? В такой игре никто сука не будет нестись вперед, чтобы ваши жопы на диванах мешком голов порадовать , смотрите детали Епта! Сильная игра во всех отношениях! Испания 🔝! Аргентина с яйцами!

💯162👍2👎2👏1🔥1

27 Jun 2026, 16:21 UTC≈1,380 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

16🐳1

27 Jun 2026, 16:19 UTC≈1,310 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

24

27 Jun 2026, 16:18 UTC≈1,210 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

13😁3

4 Apr 2026, 16:13 UTC≈1,350 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я советую скаутам в Медиалиге обратить внимание на перспективного футболиста ! Андрей Константинович Каряка 2005 года рождения!! Полный порядок, живой пример для молодых которые три передачи сделали и думают , что они футболисты …

11👍1🤡1

28 Feb 2026, 19:00 UTC≈1,450 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Когда я первый начал говорить открыто , без каких либо стеснений , что если комментаторы будут пидорасить команду в эфире , то аудитория будет развернута жопой к этому клубу, что бы он не делал! Комментатор это профессия и в каждой профессии есть профессионалы своего дела-Стас Минин допустим , который самый скучный матч превращает в интересный , а все остальное пока что оставляет двоякое впечатление.. Райзен чуть вы

7🤡2💩1🤮1

27 Feb 2026, 18:25 UTC883 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Балтика попала в Бандитский Петербург… Просто позорище , пока такое говнище будет в нашем футболе , нам прогресса не видать…. Браво Калининград !

10👎1💩1🤡1

28 Jan 2026, 22:04 UTC≈1,070 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Бенфика!!!! Трубииииииин!!! Это было что то невероятной…

11

6 Dec 2025, 18:38 UTC≈1,350 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Губерниев и Бузова …. Какой пиздец я только что увидел…

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Armenian_Guardiola. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,318,700 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Армянский Гвардиола” (@Armenian_Guardiola), 380 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Armenian_Guardiola.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.