Channel
@ArlynNo1Ettnet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
12subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003697497288 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ArlynNo1Ettnet |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 20 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ArlynNo1Ettnet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:09 | 12 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 12 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
51 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5195211300443030879 | 22 | 43.1% | |
| 👾 | 20 | 39.2% | |
| 💅 | 6 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5197662743221533451 | 3 | 5.88% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2026 to 30 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
YOU: — Я уже которое время чувствую на себе чей то взгляд... но вокруг ни 016, ни 011. Если бы это были они, я знаю как справляться хотя бы. А сейчас я не понимаю что именно угрожает мне, и угрожает ли вообще? Ну а ещё я стал больше наслаждаться путём, правда уже который раз прохожу одни и те же комнаты. Мне начинает нравится хаос здесь, даже если это и очень странно.
👾3
YOU: — Жаль не вышло, но ничего А насчёт способа попасть к вам, нууу, ко мне какой то красный огонёк из ваших хотел прийти разгромить всё. Так не и пришёл к сожалению, может он знает
👾2
YOU: — У вас же в отеле практически всё деревянное да?? Я там не был конечно, но по фото вроде так. Так вот Можно я у вас пару, ну как пару... много достаточно шкафов уничтожу для дерева? Я с их помощью могу целый дом построить 🌟
👾1
You: — Кстати! Турист, да? У меня к тебе очень.. любопытный вопрос, действительно любопытный. Не против если задам да
👾1
You: — Вспомнил одну историю, но блин, слишком мутно чтобы как либо её вам рассказать 🌟. Так что сегодня без storytime. Грустно даже.
👾1
You: — Тут появилось достаточно много новых контактов в сети. Приятно даже видеть новые профили! А ещё я заметил что даже на телефоне время 18.30 всегда 🌟 Ну и заряд всегда 86%, хотя бы не меньше половины.
👾4
You: — Со мной хоть? А то не дело без нужных средств тут все бить и кромсать
👾3
👁️:: Сколько примерно ты выпиваешь кофе за час? You: — Честно, как найду, могу хоть литр, а может вообще не капли. Да и "за час" тут трудно сказать, тут слишком размыта граница времени, ощущение что я тут уже полгода хотя стрелки часов ни разу не сдвинулись.
👾3
You: — кофе помогает от альцгеймера...
💅2
You: — кофе помогает от альцеймера...
💅2
You: — Ещё нашёл рисунок который делал один из моих знакомых, вроде. Они всегда думали что когда я пропадаю из сети то это значит, что я умер, так странно. но впринцепе возможно в реальности я так и выгляжу, я уже ни черта не помню (cr. nacora-najita)
custom 51952113004430308793
You: — Всё ещё удивляюсь этому месту... здесь было даже пугающе изначально, но со временем все эти монстры они, не знаю, больше бесят? Это немного трудно объяснить
custom 51952113004430308792
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ArlynNo1Ettnet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,017,254 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ArlynNo1Ettnet named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Arlyn's. . . Computer” (@ArlynNo1Ettnet), 12 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ArlynNo1Ettnet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.