Channel
@Are_U_Next
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
32subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002322136499 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Are_U_Next |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 December 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Are_U_Next |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 32 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 32 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
160 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 36 | 22.5% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 20.6% | |
| 🤯 | 18 | 11.3% | |
| 🥰 | 18 | 11.3% | |
| 🎄 | 9 | 5.63% | |
| 🕊 | 9 | 5.63% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 5.00% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 4.38% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 3.75% | |
| 💋 | 5 | 3.13% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 3.13% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 1.88% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.25% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.625% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2024 to 14 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Under line Unit 2 Оценки жюри 😁😎🤓🤓 Тофу: 38/50 Чеён: 25/50 Рэмбо: 41/50 Эмили: 39/50 Распределение партий Тофу: 40/50 Чеён: 28/50 Рэмбо: 45/50 Эмили: 45/50 Монтаж: 29/50 комментарий : проблема с дикцией у чеён, так же иногда не успевает за песней. так же проблема в тишине голоса и в его непоставленности. эффекты сменить срочно у Рэмбо поставлен голос правильно на песне у тофу иногда голос не попадает в ноты…
🤯10❤🔥3❤2🎉2🔥1
Who is NEXT?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤5🔥2🥰1
🤩Under line Unit 2🤩 🤩 BLACKPINK - How You Like That #AreUNext
⚡5❤3🔥3🥰2
The RATING of the Third ROUND ⭐️Наоми - 1291 ⭐️Самуэлька - 1121 🆙Кэйли - 1100 ⏬Пума - 1082 🆙Мина - 1048 ⏬Нэян - 1013 🆙Ки Ён - 997 🆙Мису - 994 ⏬Нанён - 982 —————————— 🆙Чеён - 969 ⏬Рэмбо - 957 🆙Эмили - 925 ⏬Тофу - 840
🤯7🔥2😱2❤1
Баллы участниц всех юнитов за 3 раунд Кэйли - 331 Мина - 303 Тофу - 301 Наоми - 300 Самуэлька - 296 Мису - 295 Пума - 293 Ки Ён - 284 Эмили - 280 Нэян - 260 Чеён - 259 Нанён - 256 Рэмбо - 239
❤6🕊3🔥2
Unit 4 Оценки жюри 😁😎🤓🤓 Кэйли: 43/50 Нэян: 35/50 Нанён: 39/50 Распределение партий: Кэйли: 42/50 Нэян: 30/50 Нанён: 39/50 Монтаж: 48/50 у нэян голос подходит прям идеально, но есть некоторые проблемы с бэками в интро, в том что они слишком сильно выделяются. в первом пред припеве все хорошо нанён не идёт по нотам песни, когда дело идёт к вокалу. рэп ещё приличный у кэйли во втором припеве слышно как ломается …
Unit 3 Оценки жюри 😁😎🤓🤓 Ки Ён: 41/50 Мису: 43/50 Мина: 43/50 Эмили: 40/50 Распределение партий: Ки Ён: 42/50 Мису: 43/50 Мина: 41/50 Эмили: 41/50 Монтаж: 40/50 мису как всегда остаётся на первых местах за счёт своего рэпа и своего сильного голоса у Ки Ён тоже все хорошо, ошибок нет у мины голос тоже особенный, достаточно сильно выделяется у Эмили тоже всё хорошо. только акцента нет толком, как будто тут русс…
Unit 2 Оценки жюри 😁😎🤓🤓 Тофу: 42/50 Самуэлька: 43/50 Чеён: 37/50 Распределение партий: Тофу: 40/50 Самуэлька: 45/50 Чеён: 37/50 Монтаж: 40/50 У Чеён проявляются некие проблемы с произношением и с темпом. нота как будто вытунята насильно в бридже У Самуэльки вообще все шикарно У Тофу достаточно необычный голос для этой песни, из за чего выделяется в пред припеве на фоне инструментала, но не критично. считай, к…
🔥1
Unit 1 Оценки жюри 😁😎🤓🤓 Пума : 40/50 Сохи : 25/50 Наоми : 40/50 Рэмбо : 35/50 Распределение партий : Пума : 45/50 Сохи : 28/50 Наоми : 35/50 Рэмбо : 25/50 Монтаж : 37/50 комментарий: Рэмбо немного не попала в тон в первом куплете сохи иногда в темп не попадает слишком резкое, дерзкое и грозное произношение у пумы иногда у Наоми все хорошо пока что. 🤓😎🤓🤓 Пума: 40/50 Сохи: 39/50 Наоми: 50/50 Рэмбо: 39/50 Р…
Who is NEXT?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
〰️〰️Unit 4〰️〰️ Song: Kiss of Life IGLOO 💜Кэйли 💜Нэян 💜Нанён #AreUNext?
❤2💋1🔥1🕊1🥰1😱1
Who is NEXT?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🕊3🎉1🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Are_U_Next. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Who is NEXT?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Who is NEXT?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Who is NEXT?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Who is NEXT?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Who is NEXT?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2024 to 14 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 530,638 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Are U Next?” (@Are_U_Next), 32 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Are_U_Next.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.