Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 93 days, net -169. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,114–10,337 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 22:40
10,141
-4
7 Nov 2026, 14:06
10,145
-2
6 Nov 2026, 12:17
10,147
+3
5 Nov 2026, 11:08
10,144
+4
4 Nov 2026, 07:16
10,140
-7
3 Nov 2026, 03:31
10,147
-4
2 Nov 2026, 05:41
10,151
-3
31 Oct 2026, 11:36
10,154
+5
30 Oct 2026, 11:09
10,149
+3
28 Oct 2026, 11:05
10,146
+3
26 Oct 2026, 07:40
10,143
-4
25 Oct 2026, 04:25
10,147
-5
24 Oct 2026, 04:59
10,152
+2
23 Oct 2026, 06:55
10,150
-3
22 Oct 2026, 08:46
10,153
+1
21 Oct 2026, 04:38
10,152
-2
20 Oct 2026, 02:10
10,154
+5
19 Oct 2026, 00:46
10,149
-5
18 Oct 2026, 03:30
10,154
+1
17 Oct 2026, 04:39
10,153
first reading
Engagement
56 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
31.9%
avg views ÷ 10,141 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,240
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 56 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
56 (27 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
45,310
Reactions total
1,093
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 22:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
4,895 reactions across 56 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,876
38.3%
❤
1,611
32.9%
❤🔥
877
17.9%
💯
139
2.84%
🤝
67
1.37%
🆒
53
1.08%
💔
50
1.02%
🤣
47
0.96%
🏆
44
0.899%
🫡
29
0.592%
🔥
21
0.429%
😭
18
0.368%
👎
15
0.306%
👌
13
0.266%
👏
11
0.225%
🙏
6
0.123%
🤔
6
0.123%
😢
4
0.082%
✍
3
0.061%
🤯
2
0.041%
3 further kinds
3
0.061%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,895 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 56 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Ardalannejat_org. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 56 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🥤 لحظه هایی که قفل میکنی تو قرار یا مکالمه که الان چی باید بگی این لیست رو یادت باشه:
۱. سوالاتی که با، چی میشد اگه...شروع میشن
۲. تجارب گذشته چه خوب چه بد
۳. هدف و رویاهاتون و اینکه دلتون میخواد در آینده چی بشه
معمولا این سه تا جواب میده که یه دیالوگی کلید بخوره تا بتونی از اونجا پیش بری...
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🫶Ardalannejat_org
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
💎 احترام همیشه قبل از علاقه از بین میره.
زمانی که دیگه جدی گرفته نشدی
زمانی که حرفت براش اهمیت نداشت
داد زدی و دختره توجه نکرد
تو فقط یه خورده تا ایستگاه آخر فاصله داری...
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🫶Ardalannejat_org
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🗣 بگایی سهم همه ست...
«سادیو مانه در روستایی کوچک در سنگال بزرگ شد؛ جایی که امکانات ورزشی تقریباً وجود نداشت. او با لباسهای ساده و گاهی پابرهنه فوتبال بازی میکرد، اما ایمان داشت که میتواند زندگی خانوادهاش را تغییر دهد. سالها بعد، نهتنها ستاره اروپا شد، بلکه بخش بزرگی از درآمدش را صرف ساخت مدرسه و بیمارستان در زادگاهش کرد.»
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🫶Ardalannejat_org
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
✍🏻 اون مدل از پیش بینی ناپذیری که برای خانم ها جذابه
یعنی نتونه پیش بینی کنه امروز چجوری باهاش لاس میزنی
نتونه پیش بینی کنه ایندفعه که ناراحت بود یا داشت ناز میکرد تو چجوری نرمش میکنی
نتونه پیش بینی کنه قرار بعدی چی میکنید
نه اینکه زندگیت برای خودتم پیش بینی پذیر نباشه و هیچ قاعده خاصی نداشته باشه.
هیجان و ریسک در بستر امنیت برای خانم ها جذابه نه خود هیجان.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🫶Ardalannejat_org
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
"من کنارت احساس امنیت نمیکنم"
💬 این جمله ای هست که این روزا، دارم زیاد از دخترا میشنوم. اما چی باعث میشه احساس امنیت از بین بره؟!
۱. گذشته ای که تپه ی نریده نذاشتی
۲. دوستای معمولی دختر به تعداد زیاد
۳. فازِ لاشی بودن رو به صورت افراطی در پیش بگیری
۴. عدم تعهد و نداشتن چارچوب در اکثر جنبه های زندگی
⏫از من میشنوید، میگم یه خوردش خوبه، در حد متعادل اما افراط باعث میشه که طرف مقابل فرار کنه.
🟡 @Ardalannejat_org
💘جواب به شیت تست (قسمت سی و چهارم):
🤩تو هم یکی مثل همین پسر هایی که اومدن و من ردشون کردم
1️⃣از کجا معلوم شاید اومدن دیدن اخلاق عنتو گذاشتن رفتن. وگرنه بین این همه پسر لااقل یدونه آدم حسابی پیدا میشده.
2️⃣ پس مشتری زیاد داری ولی هرکی میاد پسند نمیکنه.
این شیت تست رو فقط از یک خانم نابالغ ممکنه بشنوید و هیچ چاره ای نداره جز اینکه همینجوری برخورد کنید، تفاوتی هم نداره توی فاز کل کل باشید یا کاملا جدی این حرفو بزنه.
…
🫡بچه ها حواستون باشه مساله تو آب نمک گذاشتن
فقط برای دختری مطرح نمیشه که تو رابطست
یکسری از دختر ها شمارو در اطراف خودشون تشنه نگه میدارن که از دستتون ندن، بلکه شاید کیس بهتری پیدا شه.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🫶Ardalannejat_org
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
✔️ یه اشتباه که هر روز دارم توی چتهای بچهها میبینم:
طرف هنوز معلوم نیست اصلاً میخواد باهات وارد رابطه بشه یا نه...
بعد تو داری برنامه سفر شمال، اسم بچهها و رنگ کابینت خونه آینده رو توی ذهنت میچینی!
✔️ مردی که از واقعیت جلوتر حرکت کنه، زمین میخوره.
🟡 @Ardalannejat_org
♠️ اگه فکر میکنی خیلی سرت شلوغه و وقتی برای رابطه نداری،
به ایلان ماسک فکر کن
کارایی انجام داده که تا قبل از اون، برای بشر فقط تخیل و رویا بوده؛
مثلا از سن دوازده سالگی برنامه نویسی رو شروع کرده، موشک هایی که میفرسته فضا رو دقیقا روی سکو فرود میاره(قدیما مجبور بودن موشک رو توی اقیانوس فرود بیارن که بتونن فضا نورد هارو سالم بیرون بکشن)، تازه همین موشک هارو جوری میسازه که بشه دوباره ازش استفاده کرد. استارلینک ساخته که…
🤰اولین رابطه و اولین دوست دختر خیلی قشنگه؛
هم برای دختر و هم برای پسر
اگه تا انتخاب کردن اسم بچه هم باهم پیش رفتین کاملا عادیه، تا اینجاشو همه همین مدلیَن...😆
اما اگه پیشرفضت اینه که، این دخترِ به این دلیل و به آن دلیل با بقیه فرق میکنه و با همه فرق داره و برای همه ی عُمرم اینو میخوام...
• تا اینجا دیگه درست نیست و داری اشتباه میزنی
باورت بشه یا نه، تا دلت بخواد کیس های بهتر از مال تو وجود دارن و هستن، این که نمیخ…
❤🔥58❤23👍19👎3🏆2💔1🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @Ardalannejat_org. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
روانشناسی مردان - محمد راد @ravanemard · 55,388 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
مردان کاریزما🔥جذب زنان @karizmatikmans · 56,615 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 4 October 2026
روانشناسى زنان - محمد راد @ravanezan · 105,304 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
روانشناسی سیاه🥷🏻 @ravantype · 22,548 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 20 September 2026
DHV | ایده رابطه @dhvmen · 25,975 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 September 2026
آموزش جذب زنان | دایان @jazb_dokhtar · 23,969 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
آرشیو دوره های جذب زنان @Downloadfile_jazbzanan · 19,078 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 October 2026
Mahyar | علم رابطه @Maahyar_Ch · 41,012 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
️ (دُر | گذر هُنر ) @dor_book · 24,278 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اردلان نجات” (@Ardalannejat_org), 10,141 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ardalannejat_org.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.