Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Arbitrage Scanner Toncoin 💎

Channel

Arbitrage Scanner Toncoin 💎

@ArbitrageScannerToncoin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

532subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001830887285
TypeChannel
Username@ArbitrageScannerToncoin
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ArbitrageScannerToncoin

Growth

532539535.56 August 2026 — 539 subscribers6 August 2026 — 539 subscribers13 August 2026 — 535 subscribers21 August 2026 — 532 subscribers6 August 202621 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 531–540 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 11:04532-3
13 Aug 2026, 13:49535-4
6 Aug 2026, 18:19539no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:07539first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 21 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍17100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2024 to 30 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.56%
1 of 18 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,340
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
626
over 15 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
LatgC3wJs114 August 202414 August 2024

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2024 to 30 September 2025. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2025, 11:41 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

19 Sept 2025, 08:13 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 28 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

14 Aug 2024, 17:02 UTC≈2,340 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Advertisementerid LatgC3wJsPhoto

🧐 Как фонды и маркет-мейкеры заработали на обвале рынка? В первый понедельник августа криптовалютный рынок потрясла масштабная ликвидация, обрушившая цену биткоина на $10,000 ниже $50,000. Паника охватила трейдеров, и альткоины тоже сильно пострадали. За два дня рынок потерял почти $2 миллиарда, но кто-то на этом хорошо заработал. Мы разобрали, как крупные игроки, маркет-мейкеры и фонды с помощью инсайдерской инфор

👍2

31 Jul 2024, 12:13 UTC≈1,990 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔥 ArbitrageScanner на OKX WEB3 Мы рады сообщить, что наш сервис теперь представлен на OKX WEB3! Теперь вы можете отслеживать спреды и анализировать кошельки прямо из мобильного приложения OKX. Для этого: 1. Перейдите на вкладку Web3 2. Нажмете Discover 3. Выберите вкладку DApp 4. Напишите в поисковой строке ArbitrageScanner 🚀 Используйте наш сервис так как вам будет удобно!

👍3

23 Jul 2024, 08:50 UTC≈1,800 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🗣 Представляем Telegram-приложение tap-to-earn OKX Racer 🚀 Заводите двигатели и мчитесь к победе! 🔮 Угадывайте цену Биткоина 🔝 Зарабатывайте баллы и используйте их для апгрейдов 🏆 Соревнуйтесь за первое место в таблице лидеров Вы можете играть в OKX Racer без привязки к своему OKX-аккаунту. Однако для того, чтобы претендовать на вознаграждения в будущем, рекомендуется привязать аккаунт OKX.

👍4

19 Jul 2024, 15:52 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 6 August 2026

🚀 В новом видео мы расскажем про подборки от ArbitrageScanner! Узнайте, что холдят топовые маркетмейкеры, селебрити и смарт трейдеры! 🔍 В этом видео мы разбираем полностью для чего нужны подборки и рассматриваем на реальном кейсе как фонд DWF Labs аккумулировал токен FET в течение года, который вырос на 1400%. Во втором кейсе мы показываем стратегию торговли, которая принесла нашему клиенту +100% к депозиту за месяц

19 Jul 2024, 00:56 UTC626 viewsread 6 August 2026

🔥 Как наши пользователи зарабатывают с помощью стратегии арбитражного финансирования ? Бывают ситуации, когда биржи предлагают разные ставки финансирования для одного и того же токена . Дополнительно могут быть случаи, когда ставки финансирования для одного и того же токена на разных биржах происходят с разной периодичностью, например, на бирже 1 ставка финансирования начисляется раз в 8 часов , а на бирже 2 — кажды

18 Jul 2024, 15:21 UTC467 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Индийская биржа #WazirX была взломана через скомпрометированный ETH-кошелек с мультиподписью. Активы биржи на сумму $234,9 млн были переведены на адрес: 0x04b2. Все транзакции были обработаны через миксер Tornado Cash. Итого с биржи было украдено: 🟣 5.43T SHIB ($102M) 🟣 15,298 ETH ($52.5M) 🟣 20.5M MATIC ($11.24M) 🟣 640.27B PEPE ($7.6M) 🟣 5.79M USDT 🟣 135M GALA ($3.5M) Кошелек "0x04b2" начал сливать эти активы на

👍1

13 Jul 2024, 04:31 UTC488 viewsread 6 August 2026

🚀 Каждую пятницу у нас выходит видео по ончейн сервисам ArbitrageScanner 🔥 Сегодня у нас видео про ИИ поиск похожих Мы ответим в ролике на такие вопросы как: 🟣 Что это за сервис и зачем он нужен? 🟣 Как его использовать чтобы искать инсайдерские кошельки? 🟣 Какие расследования можно сделать и какую интересную информацию найти? 🟣 Как наши клиенты зарабатывать используя этот сервис? А также мы покажем на 2х примерах

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ArbitrageScannerToncoin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,199,243 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Arbitrage Scanner Toncoin 💎” (@ArbitrageScannerToncoin), 532 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ArbitrageScannerToncoin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.