Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ArabicShield Team

@ArabicShieldTeam

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,095subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002427860835
TypeChannel
Username@ArabicShieldTeam
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ArabicShieldTeam

Growth

1,0951,0981,096.57 August 2026 — 1,098 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,098 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,095 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,095–1,098 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 15:281,095-3
8 Aug 2026, 00:051,098no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:331,098first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 20m
Average length
46m 40s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

35 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2880.0%
❤‍🔥617.1%
🔥12.86%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2025 to 5 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Dec 2025, 12:32 UTC337 viewsread 8 August 2026

Winter in Gaza is brutal—families are enduring freezing nights without proper shelter. Your help can provide essential tents to protect vulnerable children and elders from the cold. Please donate to Help them today: https://paypal.com/ncp/payment/WDGGWGYU23JL4 #Help_Gaza #Donate #FreePalestine #Save_Gaza

12 Dec 2025, 10:07 UTC213 viewsread 8 August 2026

لا خير في امة بالدفي تلتحف واطفال غزة ونساؤها ورجالها بالعراء ترتجف #Stand_with_Gaza 🇵🇸

23 Aug 2025, 10:52 UTC433 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔴 كيف تعمل الرادرات العسكرية ؟ 🤔 الرادارات العسكرية بتشتغل بشكل أساسي عن طريق إرسال موجات راديو RF وبعدين تستقبل الإشارات اللي بترتد من الأهداف -> لتحديد موقعها، سرعتها، واتجاهها بدقة عالية دون اي حاجة لأستقبال أشارة من الهدف مثل أنظمة الملاحة والرادارت العادية, ألية العمل كالتالي: الـ Transmitter بيطلع موجات راديوية عالية التردد (RF pulses) باتجاه الهدف عن طريق الـAntenna —> لما الموجات تصطدم بالهدف، جزء منها بير

22 Aug 2025, 19:45 UTC362 viewsread 8 August 2026

بدأ البث المباشر بعنوان سهرة سيبرانية مع مختصي فريق Arabic Shield. https://t.me/Arabic_Shield?videochat=61b5f16752bf756db1

20 Aug 2025, 11:43 UTC362 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

اي شخص عنده سؤال يتفضل ورح نجاوبه أن شاء الله https://t.me/Arabic_Shield

19 Aug 2025, 20:17 UTC290 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🔴 هام جداً إليكم تسجيل بث Client Side Attacks التي تحدثنا فيها عن ثغرة Cors و Clickjacking مع تطبيق عملي. - المقدم : @Abdalrahman0x80 💡 اقتراحاتكم للبث القادم مرحب بها، وسيكون هناك بثوث قادمة كثيرة قريباً.

❤‍🔥1

19 Aug 2025, 19:19 UTC215 viewsread 8 August 2026

بدأ البث المباشر بعنوان Client side attacks وستناول مواضيع فيه مثل Clickjacking & CORS.. https://t.me/Arabic_Shield?videochat

19 Aug 2025, 12:45 UTC507 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔴 جاهز تستكشف ثغرة الـ Clickjacking And CORS في الويب بتست !! جلسة بث مباشر تشرح الخطورة، كيف تستغلها بشكل عملي ! 🎯 ماذا سنتناقش؟ 1- شرح لثغرة CORS وتأثيرها على أمان المواقع 2- خطوات الـ Pentest العملي للثغرة 3 - ثغرة الـ ClickJacking 4 - تطبيق عملي وأجابة على بعض الأسئلة ⏰ اليوم، 19 أغسطس، 9:30 مساءً – 11:00 مساءً بتوقيت سوريا 📌 (UTC+0 18:00 - 19:00) 📍 تابعنا على مجتمع Arabic Shield رابط المجتمع : https://t.me

2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ArabicShieldTeam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 446,105 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ArabicShield Team” (@ArabicShieldTeam), 1,095 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ArabicShieldTeam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.