‼️TRADER THÀNH CÔNG NHẤT CRYPTO Đây là 1 trong những nhà đầu tư thành công nhất trong thị trường mình từng biết!
❤1

Channel
@ArSignal
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,020subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001892819091 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ArSignal |
| Description | 📍 Channel cung cấp thông tin, nhận định thị trường Crypto nhanh nhất. Chia sẻ kinh nghiệm, kiến thức đầu tư. 🔑 Tham gia Nhóm VIP 👉 Thư ký hỗ trợ: @hotroARC 👉 For Business: ☎️ Hotline: 09.626.88.246 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ArSignal |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @ArSignal/10959 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC | @ARsingal/58624 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ARsingal/58644 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC | @ArSignal/10961 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ArSignal/10962 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC | @ARsingal/58654 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ARsingal/58664 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC | @ArSignal/10963 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ARsingal/58685 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC | @ArSignal/10965 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ArSignal/10969 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 02:08 UTC | @ARsingal/58726 Aug 2026, 02:08 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @ARsingal | 18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | even |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 9 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @ARsingal. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 8,020 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 8,031 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 8,039 | first reading |
38 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 38 (31 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,625 |
| Reactions total | 37 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
37 reactions across 26 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 37 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
‼️TRADER THÀNH CÔNG NHẤT CRYPTO Đây là 1 trong những nhà đầu tư thành công nhất trong thị trường mình từng biết!
❤1
🔴MUA ĐÂU LỖ ĐẤY: NÊN DỪNG LẠI HAY TIẾP TỤC ĐẦU TƯ? Lợi nhuận bền vững không đến từ việc bạn đoán đúng thị trường bao nhiêu lần, mà đến từ việc bạn giữ được bao nhiêu tiền khi thị trường đi ngược dự đoán. Bấm xem video ngay để cùng bóc tách sự khác biệt giữa tư duy "hên xui" và tư duy của một nhà đầu tư chuyên nghiệp, từ đó đưa ra quyết định đúng đắn nhất cho nguồn vốn của bạn lúc này. 👇 AE xem tại đây nhé!
❤1
Ngày 11/08, Quỹ Vàng SPDR mua vào 1.71 tấn Vàng. Nâng mức dự trữ Vàng lên 1022.67 tấn Vàng.
❤1
📌 PLAN NHẬN ĐỊNH VÀNG NGÀY 12/08/2026 🖥 Bối cảnh & Tin tức vĩ mô - Trong 24 giờ qua, tình hình thế giới tiếp tục xoay quanh những diễn biến căng thẳng giữa Mỹ và Iran. Về mặt dữ liệu kinh tế, hôm nay thị trường sẽ đón nhận tin tức cực kỳ quan trọng từ Mỹ liên quan đến chỉ số lạm phát CPI. Dữ liệu này được kỳ vọng sẽ gây ảnh hưởng mạnh đến đường đi của giá Vàng. 🖥 Góc nhìn Phân tích Kỹ thuật (Khung H1) - Hành vi g…
❤2
TOP 1 NHẬN ~12,500 USD – kèo đua volume DOS này đang khá xịn. OKX Boost vừa mở Trading Competition cho DOS, và tổng thưởng lên tới 735.000$, pool lớn nha anh em! Top 1: 25,000 DOS ~ $12,500 Top 2: 15,600 DOS ~ $7,800 Top 3: 9,740 DOS ~ $4,870 Top 4–10: 6,480 DOS ~ $3,240 Top 3000: 220 DOCS ~ $108 Điều kiện vào BXH cũng đơn giản: Boost Balance tối thiểu $100 và đạt từ $100 volume. Volume được tính khi trade DOS với…
▶️ LIVETRADE XAUUSD & BTCUSDT: Set Up Vào Lệnh Phiên Mỹ ⏰ Thời gian: 19:30 Tối nay 🔗 Xem tại đây Bước vào phiên Mỹ, cả Vàng (XAUUSD) và Bitcoin (BTCUSDT) thường bắt đầu xuất hiện những nhịp biến động mạnh khi thanh khoản gia tăng và dòng tiền lớn nhập cuộc. Đây cũng là thời điểm giá dễ tạo những cú phá vỡ giả, quét thanh khoản khiến Trader vào lệnh sớm rất dễ bị cuốn theo biến động ngắn hạn. Tối nay, Admin Phong s…
❤1
New User OKX tháng 8 có deal mới đây anh em. OKX vừa mở 8 SUPER DEAL với tổng giải thưởng lên tới 32,000 USDT, dành riêng cho những user mới bắt đầu giao dịch. User có thể hoàn thành các nhiệm vụ để nhận gói quà tân thủ trị giá lên tới 650.000 VNĐ, sau đó tiếp tục tích lũy volume để tham gia BXH Top 100 chia pool 3,888 USDT. Đặc biệt, chỉ cần đạt tối thiểu 5,000 USDT volume là đã đủ điều kiện tham gia BXH, nên anh…
📌 PLAN NHẬN ĐỊNH VÀNG NGÀY 11/08/2026 🖥 Bối cảnh & Tin tức vĩ mô - Trong 24 giờ qua, tình hình thế giới tiếp tục xoay quanh những diễn biến căng thẳng giữa Mỹ và Iran. Về mặt dữ liệu kinh tế, hôm nay thị trường tương đối bình lặng và không đón nhận thêm tin tức quan trọng nào có khả năng tác động mạnh đến đường đi của giá Vàng. 🖥 Góc nhìn Phân tích Kỹ thuật (Khung H1) - Hành vi giá (Price Action): Ngày hôm qua gi…
❤1
▶️ LIVETRADE SCALPING: Săn Entry Lệnh Vàng XAUUSD! ⏰ Thời gian: 20:30 Tối nay 🔗 Xem tại đây Thị trường Vàng XAUUSD đang bước vào giai đoạn biến động mạnh với những nhịp tăng giảm liên tục trong phiên. Đây cũng là lúc rất nhiều Trader dễ bị cuốn theo từng cây nến, vào lệnh vội vàng và nhanh chóng rơi vào trạng thái FOMO khi giá liên tục quét lên xuống. Tuy nhiên, với Scalping, điều quan trọng không phải là vào thật…
❤2
⚠️⚠️⚠️ CHƠI ALTCOIN CHÚ Ý Video này mình sẽ bóc trần sự thật câu chuyện các dự án ALTCOIN lấy tiền của nhà đầu tư như thế nào ngay tại thời điểm 2026.
❤1
📌 PLAN NHẬN ĐỊNH VÀNG NGÀY 10/08/2026 🖥 Bối cảnh & Tin tức vĩ mô - Trong 48 giờ qua, tình hình thế giới tiếp tục xoay quanh những diễn biến căng thẳng giữa Mỹ và Iran. Về mặt dữ liệu kinh tế, hôm nay thị trường tương đối bình lặng và không đón nhận thêm tin tức quan trọng nào có khả năng tác động mạnh đến đường đi của giá Vàng. 🖥 Góc nhìn Phân tích Kỹ thuật (Khung H1) - Hành vi giá (Price Action): Sau khi Vàng có…
❤1
⚠️⚠️⚠️BITCOIN ETHEREUM THÁNG 8 Anh em nào đang cầm lệnh BTC và ETH trong tháng này thì hết sức chú ý giúp mình tín hiệu này!
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @ArSignal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 200,070 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ARC Channel: Thông tin, tín hiệu, tài liệu chiến lược” (@ArSignal), 8,020 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ArSignal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.