Channel
@ApuestasMarc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,173subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001864696492 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ApuestasMarc |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ApuestasMarc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 1,173 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 1,177 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 1,178 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (6 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,546 |
| Reactions total | 85 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
142 reactions across 15 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 142 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏖 Hola a todos! Estos días he recibido algún mensaje preguntando si la cuenta estaba inactiva. No, estoy muy activo pero disfrutando de mis vacaciones como pronosticador. A finales de agosto ya os daré toda la información sobre el grupo Premium y en septiembre la actividad volverá (a medio gas) para arrancar a tope ya en octubre. Espero que estéis disfrutando del verano. ¡Nos leemos en breve!
👍25
🔐 Recomendación 1% bank 😆♥️ Portland y Miami 40 o más victorias 📚 Bet365 - 1.73 🏀 NBA Largo Plazo Os dejo otra que va muy en relación con las dos de ayer. Por el chat del grupo Premium salió esta opción en Betfair y luego vimos que se podía hacer también en Bet365. Nos encaja mucho con los argumentos de ayer. Básicamente si buscamos que Portland gane 44 partidos, aquí rebajamos línea y si buscamos que Miami gane su …
👍7
🔐 Recomendación 0.5% bank 😆 Portland over 43.5 victorias 📚 Bet365 - 1.86 🏀 NBA Largo Plazo Las dos últimas temporadas hemos ido a unders de victorias en este tipo de recos y para esta iremos a un over. Los Portland Trail Blazers finalizaron la temporada 2025-2026 de la NBA con un récord de 42 victorias y 40 derrotas. Con Damian Lillard recuperado de sus problemas físicos y con el flamante fichaje de Ja Morant, me gu…
👍9
Photo, posted without a caption
🔐 Recomendación 0.5% bank ♥️ Miami gana su división 📚 Bet365 - 2.40 🏀 NBA Largo Plazo Reco cargada de valor. Con el fichaje de Giannis Antetokounmpo, los Heat pasan a ser favoritos para acabar la regular season como campeones de la División Sureste por delante de Orlando, Atlanta, Charlotte y Washington. Se habla también que LeBron James podría acabar regresando a Florida. Así pues, a esta cuota 2.40, si las lesione…
👍11
Photo, posted without a caption
...en un rato os vos a dejar 2 recos a largo plazo para la temporada de NBA. No es mi especialidad pero hablando con mi confidente americano que domina el tema, me apetece compartirlas por aquí. Las dejaré ancladas. Son recomendaciones porqué solo las he encontrado en Bet365. Si estuvieran también en Winamax sería picks del servicio premium.
👍3
🎉 Hoy toca hacer mención al baloncesto de pies y felicitar a todos nuestros seguidores que les gusta el fútbol con ¡el segundo mundial de España!
👍14
Marchaba perfecta nuestra reco del Tour y se pagaba muy bien. La única cosa que nos la hacía fallar era una caída y un abandono y así ha sido. Toca pikear ❌ aquí .
👍5
El otro día os compartí una semifinal entre España y Francia. Hoy me apetece compartir una final de Mundial contra Argentina. Qué partidazo 😍
👍11
🏀🗓️ La ACB revela las fechas de la temporada 26/27: - Supercopa Endesa Badalona: 19 y 20 de septiembre - Inicio Liga Regular: 26 de septiembre - Copa del Rey Valencia: 18-21 de febrero Nosotros seguimos atentos al mercado y tomando notas. Aunque no se comparten picks, uno no deja nunca de trabajar.
👍8
Después del primer tramo Tour de Francia tenemos a los tres ciclistas bien posicionados dentro del Top10 con Pogacar maillot amarillo, Vingegaard segundo y Seixas sexto con margen respecto al undécimo. Seguimos 💪🏻
👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ApuestasMarc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 944,431 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ApuestasMarc 🏀” (@ApuestasMarc), 1,173 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ApuestasMarc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.