CRINGY ASF! 🥴🥴🥴🤮🤮🤮

Channel
Aphrodite's Apes
@AphroditesApes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
18subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001825203584 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AphroditesApes |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AphroditesApes |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 18 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 19 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:59 | 19 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 12 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 00s
- Average length
- 1m 00s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
128 reactions across 9 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 26 | 20.3% | |
| 💩 | 18 | 14.1% | |
| 🤣 | 17 | 13.3% | |
| 😱 | 15 | 11.7% | |
| 🤮 | 13 | 10.2% | |
| 🤯 | 11 | 8.59% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 6.25% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 3.91% | |
| 🤬 | 5 | 3.91% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 2.34% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 1.56% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.56% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 0.781% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.781% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.781% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 12 October 2023 to 2 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
LMAO! WHO MADE THIS TOKEN? IS IT A TRIBUTE TO THE ONE AND ONLY LADY T JEET?
Bought $LADYT - Strong Independent Lady Jeet on Solana. Dare to Troll a lady? Lady Troll Good narrative with a couple of known chads onboard. Seems the jeets are out, aped here at $15k, moon or dust CA: EevmByw7GNRqFQs5yb6E2pvSE6P2hxyJdufmLWnhKtD5 Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/eevmbyw7gnrqfqs5yb6e2pvse6p2hxyjdufmlwnhktd5 https://t.me/LadyTsol https://ladytroll.lol
Sticker, posted without a caption
⚠️Another Scam Project lead by @ladyT_eth ! Lady T orchestrated yet another scam, this time involving the relaunch of $Pepi. Despite the renouncement and locking of the V1 contract, they chose to take control and relaunch under a new V2 contract. Paddy, who might have regretted endorsing this, must be feeling the heat. Additionally, Lady T (AKA the Galaxy Heroes scammer), she is attempting to cozy up and be a wanna …
🤮3😱2👏1
🌊💲🔤🔤🔤🔤 ✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️🚨 💎 December 8, at 5-6PM EST. Total supply - 100M. Starting MC - 50K. Since its initial launch in July, $PEPI reached an all-time high of 3M!!! Project was abandoned by the dev, and the community has stepped up, steering Pepi V1 to a remarkable 3 Million MC without even contract or LP control! GOOD GUYS!! Now, they're relaunching with 100% control of the project! $PEPI is a safu hold with a…
😢1😭1😱1
Oh those dentures of Lady @LADYT_ETH @LADYT_555 be careful when talking lies they might fall! She's attempting to divert your attention now by posting and discrediting others in her channel to conceal her scam. She has shifted her focus to posting and spamming unrelated content from Crypto Heroes. Rather than seeking out the real perpetrator (which is likely her), she's directing blame and accusations towards innoc…
🤣5💩3😁3👍2
@Crypt0GirlAnna made a mistake when she decided to collaborate with Lady Turd @LADYT_555. They had a prior falling out, when Lady T refused to give her with early access to a certain project's contract address before the launch of Crypto Heroes. They eventually reconciled, and Crypto Anna, rekindled the friendship. However, unbeknownst to Crypto Anna, Lady T had a cunning scheme to cast her as the scapegoat in her…
👏5💩3👌2😁1
Lady Turd @LADYT_555@LADYT_ETH is actively removing and banning anyone who dares to question which is really sus? If someone should face legal consequences, it should be Lady T, who is the actual mastermind behind the Crypto Heroes Scam. She's attempting to distract from her involvement by falsely showcasing transaction records and unfairly blaming her sister in marketing, @Crypt0GirlAnna. She seems to have a false…
😱7💩5🤣5👏2🤬2❤1
Voice message, posted without a caption
😁10🤯3⚡2👍1🤣1
Aphrodite's Apes pinned a photo
See how Lady T attempts to conceal her involvement in these crypto farms. She has shifted her focus to posting and spamming unrelated content from Crypto Heroes. Rather than seeking out the real perpetrator (which is likely her), she's directing blame and accusations towards innocent individuals or projects that have no connection to Crypto Heroes (her fraudulent project). She's avoiding being exposed as the real c…
🤮10💩5🔥5🤬2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @AphroditesApes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@AphroditesApes named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 3 posts, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aphrodite's Apes” (@AphroditesApes), 18 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AphroditesApes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.