Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قطعاتِ تفکر

Channel

قطعاتِ تفکر

@Aphorismos

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,468subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001045719496
TypeChannel
Username@Aphorismos
CreatedBetween 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Aphorismos

Growth

1,4681,4701,4695 August 2026 — 1,470 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,470 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,468 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,469 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,468 subscribers5 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,468–1,470 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 14:171,468-1
11 Aug 2026, 22:321,469+1
9 Aug 2026, 05:041,468-2
6 Aug 2026, 07:461,470no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:451,470first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.3%
avg views ÷ 1,468 subscribers
Avg views / post
342
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total2,737
Reactions total107
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC≈135 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

درباره کتاب #وقتی_نیچه_گریست #رنج به تنهایی کشنده نیست، بلکه رنج بی‌معناست که انسان را از پا در می‌آورد... شفای واقعی در انزوای کامل رخ نمی‌دهد، بلکه در لحظه‌ای اتفاق می‌افتد که دو انسان در عمیق‌ترین سطح وجودی باهم ملاقات می‌کنند... @Aphorismos

30 Jul 2026, 10:14 UTC≈289 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

دلت براش تنگ نمیشه؟ اوه الکس، معلومه که دلم براش تنگ میشه. من واقعا درک نمی‌کنم! چطوره که دونفر انقدر همو دوست داشته باشن و اینقدر راحت از هم جدا شن؟... اوه الکس از هر دونفری که از هم جدا میشن یه نفرشون هیچ‌وقت اون یکی رو دوست نداشته، فقط اصرار داشته که طرفو دوست داشته.... الکس گاهی آدما تورو دوست ندارن اون حسی که بهشون میدی، فقط اون حسی که ازت دریافت می‌کنن رو دوست دارن نه خودتو.... @Aphorismos

28 Jul 2026, 05:09 UTC≈386 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

آنومی: زخم نامرئی جامعه امیل دورکیم، جامعه‌شناس فرانسوی، در عمق آشوب‌های صنعتی قرن نوزدهم ایستاد و نامی بر ترس بی‌نام گذاشت: آنومی. او می‌گفت جامعه شاید از فقر جان سالم به در ببرد، اما از بی‌معنایی و بی‌هنجاری نه. فقر، جسم را آزار می‌دهد؛ آنومی، روح جمعی را می‌خشکاند. فقر، مرز دارد؛ آنومی، مرزها را محو می‌کند. در جهان مدرن، قواعد کهنه فرو می‌ریزند و قواعد نو هنوز زاده نشده‌اند. انسان، ناگهان در فضایی معلق رها می‌شود

26 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTC≈315 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

این که اینقدر دوستت دارم، ضعیف بودن نیست، این، قدرت توست.. #احمد_شاملو https://telegram.me/Aphorismos

24 Jul 2026, 19:45 UTC≈423 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

Beethoven [Focus] Top 15 Masterpieces to Rebuild Willpower & Awaken Deep Focus 15 قطعه برتر بتهوون @Aphorismos

23 Jul 2026, 18:05 UTC≈392 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

این که مرا به سوی تو می‌کشد عشق نیست، شکوه توست؛ و آن‌چه مرا به انتخاب تو برمی‌انگیزد، نیاز تنِ من نیست، یگانگی ارواح و اندیشه‌های ماست.. #ناشناس https://telegram.me/Aphorismos

23 Jul 2026, 16:35 UTC≈412 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

در باب مرز #عقل و #جنون در عمق وجود انسان، جایی که نور و سایه در هم می‌آمیزند، مرزی وجود دارد به نازکی یک لحظه. آن مرز نه دیواری استوار از سنگ و آهن، که پلی است از تار عنکبوت بر فراز پرتگاهی بی‌پایان. یک زخم ناگفته، یک فشار خاموش روزگار، و ناگهان تعادل می‌شکند. عقل، آن شاه خود فرمان درون، به یکباره به مسخره‌ترین دلقک جنون بدل می‌شود. ما عادت کرده‌ایم خود را قوی بنامیم. این کلمه را مثل زره‌ای بر تن می‌کنیم و به جنگ ز

16 Jul 2026, 06:05 UTC≈482 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026

نیچه می‌گفت "آن‌چه منو نکشه، قوی‌ترم می‌کنه"، اما اون هرگز نگفت که گاهی "آن‌چه مرا نمی‌کشه"، فقط منو به ویرانه‌ای زنده تبدیل می‌کنه؛ ویرانه‌ای که هنوز نفس می‌کشه، اما دیگه آواز نمی‌خونه… #سیامک https://telegram.me/Aphorismos

15 Jul 2026, 13:43 UTC≈461 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

هر بار که یک دروغ مقدس را می‌کشیم، باید آماده باشیم که جای خالی‌اش را با چیزی قوی‌تر، زیباتر و پر معناتر پر کنیم؛ وگرنه فقط صحرای درون‌مان بزرگ‌تر می‌شود. #سیامک https://telegram.me/Aphorismos

12 Jul 2026, 08:14 UTC≈623 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

در عمق وجود انسان، افسانه‌ای دیرینه روایت می‌شود: افسانه‌ی "قوی بودن". افسانه‌ای که مردان و زنان را به مجسمه‌هایی از سنگ و فولاد بدل می‌کند! موجوداتی که هرگز نمی‌شکنند، هرگز خم نمی‌شوند، و هرگز اشکی بر گونه‌شان نمی‌لغزد. این افسانه می‌گوید: تو کافی هستی. تنهایی‌ات را بپذیر، زره‌ات را محکم‌تر ببند، و راه را ادامه بده. اما این، تنها یک روایت است، نه حقیقت. حقیقت اما در لایه‌های پنهان‌تر نهفته. حتی کوه‌ترین قله‌ها نیز ر

10 Jul 2026, 10:36 UTC≈451 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

یاداشتی کوتاه درباره فیلم The Banshees of I Inisherin 2022 فیلم مارتین مک‌ دونا، در ظاهر یک کمدی سیاه درباره‌ی پایان دوستی است، اما در لایه عمیق‌تر، مواجهه‌ای اگزیستانسیال با زمان، مرگ و جستجوی معنا را به تصویر می‌کشد. فیلم درباره زمان محدود زندگی، معنای وجود، دوستی مردانه، تنهایی، و این است که چقدر آسان می‌توان روابط را نابود کرد. مک‌دونا با طنز سیاه و دیالوگ‌های تیز، لایه‌های عمیقی از افسردگی وجودی، جنگ (هم جنگ د

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Aphorismos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,297,618 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قطعاتِ تفکر” (@Aphorismos), 1,468 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Aphorismos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.