Channel
@ApezWhalez
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
11subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001791119244 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ApezWhalez |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 16 June 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ApezWhalez |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 11 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:28 | 11 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 3 | 75.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2022 to 11 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 28 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
https://t.me/VitalikMandingo
🔥3
aped, dev already burned 3% and 2% sent to VB wallet. lfg mcap 11k Vitalik Mandingo ERC20 $MANDINGO Tax 6% for buybacks to build BIG GREEN DILDOS on chart. Total supply 100 million Max wallet 3 million Max txn 3 million https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0xd68df50746f1d436c751eb38038bdd5604bf14ae https://t.me/VitalikMandingo
Aped $DOGETH - DogETH Style Mcap 22k - eth rewards for holders could pop! https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0xe0f908154395f0ba4a80d85f0c41fb6909e4ec8f https://t.me/DogETHStyle
just aped this play, 20ETH initial LP (FAT LP) MCAP 142k Medium looks boolish https://medium.com/@oushikuma/the-bear-and-the-bull-3b0828b7d521 could do some good numbers! OushiKuma $OKU https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x1dc1b9452c239a346b32ad4407a8e87d842e8b00 https://t.me/OushiKumaCMMTY
❤1
a lot of chads in it and more to come it seems, u know the drill apes! always take initials in this crazy space. take care of your pockets !
aped Welcome to the Human Race - The Last Project. This play will be the “last project” I launch. All the taxes will be used for marketing from the “community”. With that being said, the community will be making the Telegram, Twitter, website and socials, applying for CG, CMC and building the project. Once the community builds the Telegram and finds the leaders suitable and trust worthy in the community I will be …
REAL FUCKING CHADS !!! EEEZZ 1 milly on this GEM with AUTO LP & AUTO BURN LP !!! DONT FADE ON IT APES!!! Modus Operandi Buy! 🔆🔆🔆🔆🔆🔆🔆🔆🔆🔆 Spent: $940.28 (0.5 WETH) Got: 2,060 PRAXIS Buyer Position: New! Price: 0.4563 (0.0002426 WETH) MCap: $45,625 https://t.me/PRAXIS_Portal
Told ya it would reverse !!! LFG already x4 from bottom! Next $LQNTY, send it sers https://t.me/PRAXIS_Portal
This could reverse ?! Modus Operandi Buy! 🔆🔆 Spent: $187.94 (0.1 WETH) Got: 3,233 PRAXIS Buyer Position: New! Price: 0.05812 (0.00003092 WETH) MCap: $5,811 https://t.me/PRAXIS_Portal
Modus Operandi Buy! 🔆🔆🔆🔆🔆 Spent: $446.12 (0.25 WETH) Got: 2,944 PRAXIS Buyer Position: New! Price: 0.1515 (0.00008490 WETH) MCap: $15,150 TX | Chart | Buyer | Uniswap
aped it at 10k mcap good play with AUTO-LP $PRAXIS Modus Operandi Ethereum Blockchain Tax 5% 4% Auto LP / 1% Dev TOTAL SUPPLY 100% - 100000 MAX WALLET AT LAUNCH 3% - 3000 “He who fears he will suffer, already suffers because he fears.” “FOMO creates suffering, yet those who suffer, have FOMO.” Join our $PRAXIS path to the top! Website https://praxispath.xyz/ Telegram https://t.me/PRAXIS_Portal Twitter ht…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ApezWhalez. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,053,026 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ApezWhalez named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ApezWhalez X100 CALLS 🦍🦍🦍” (@ApezWhalez), 11 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ApezWhalez.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.