Channel
@ApeXdexANN
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,981subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001670784180 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ApeXdexANN |
| Description | ApeX is a permissionless and non-custodial and non-KYC derivatives DEX that operates on an orderbook model and delivers cross-margined perpetual contracts. https://linktr.ee/ApeXDEX |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ApeXdexANN |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 9,981 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 9,975 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 9,974 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (17 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,426 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📢 Saylor's Stock is Down 74% Over 12 Months Against a 47% Bitcoin Drawdown As of Aug 13, the market still prices @MicroStrategy bankruptcy at 4%, below @JetBlue and @Xerox. 10 markets on crypto companies, and the line between a re-rating and risk. Read now: https://www.apex.exchange/blog/detail/reclassification-is-not-distress-crypto-public-companies
📢 Bitcoin's Median 2026 Outcome Prices at $75,000 - and a New All-Time High Just 5% We normalised every major's strike ladder for spot, cross-checked it on-chain, and one asset's curve looks nothing like the rest. Read now: https://www.apex.exchange/blog/detail/what-the-market-is-pricing-crypto-2026
📢 Democrats Lead Five Competitive Senate Races. Senate Control Still Prices at 49% for Them. That gap is what most midterms coverage will get wrong before November 3 🇺🇸 10 things worth watching for the US midterm elections, read across 584 open markets. Read now: https://www.apex.exchange/blog/detail/10things-midterms
📢 Excited to Partner with AEON! Bringing $APEX into AEON's 50M+ merchant network opens new possibilities for AI-native transactions, autonomous commerce, and real-world payments. Looking forward to seeing what we build together. Want the full story? Explore how our partnership with AEON expands $APEX utility across AI, autonomous commerce, and real-world payments. Read more: ✦ Website: https://aeon.xyz/news/bdc4b…
📢 ApeX Omni Weekly Update! ✦ Politics and Crypto prediction markets are now live - three categories total: Sports, Politics, Crypto ✦ Spot closed August 5. Your assets are on their way back, no action needed unless you held tokens on Solana Read more: https://apex.exchange/blog/detail/weekly-updates-aug10
📢 Three Indicators, Three Untold Stories! ✦ For decades, Wall Street's biggest players quietly relied on one indicator to outsmart the market. It wasn't a secret, just overlooked. Discover the history behind VWAP and why it still matters today. ✦ A 13th-century mathematician uncovered a pattern that still shapes modern markets. Discover the mystery behind Fibonacci Retracement, the Golden Ratio, and why traders watc…
❤1
📢 J. Welles Wilder Jr. Gave Traders One of the Market's Most Overlooked Secrets. Decades later, the ADX still helps separate genuine trends from convincing illusions. Discover why it has stood the test of time: https://apex.exchange/blog/detail/adx-explained
📢 Most Traders Don't Lose Because of Bad Entries, They Lose Because They Have No Idea How Volatile the Market Really Is. Learn how ATR can help you place smarter stops, size your positions better, and trade with more confidence. Read now: https://apex.exchange/blog/detail/atr-explained
📢 July 2026 Buyback Complete - 225K $APEX Total! Five buyback batches were completed throughout the month: ✦ Batch 1: 40K $APEX ✦ Batch 2: 40K $APEX ✦ Batch 3: 35K $APEX ✦ Batch 4: 65K $APEX ✦ Batch 5: 45K $APEX More to come. Full buyback stats: https://omni.apex.exchange/stats
📢 Weekly Update is Here! Two new TradFi perpetuals on Omni Web: 1️⃣ ORACLE-USDT & CXMT-USDT, up to 50x 2️⃣ Plus App v3.62.0 with an upgraded SDK Full Details: https://www.apex.exchange/blog/detail/weekly-update-aug3
📢 ChangXin Memory Technologies Runs 90% of @MicronTech Wafer Capacity And earns a third of its DRAM revenue. Capacity is not value. Mix is. We break down where China's DRAM champion $CXMT is heading next, and the number nobody is pricing. Read now: https://www.apex.exchange/blog/detail/CXMT-insights
📢 $CXMT is Now Live on ApeX Omni! Asia's biggest IPO, on-chain. ChangXin Memory listed with up to 50x leverage. Long or short China's DRAM champion, straight from your wallet. Trade now: ✦ CXMT-USDT (50x): https://omni.apex.exchange/trade/CXMTUSDT
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @ApeXdexANN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 168,603 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ApeX Announcements” (@ApeXdexANN), 9,981 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ApeXdexANN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.