привет пацаны в кк наборчик это не открытие рп ну прост мб кто-то захочет #тейк | @AoHRPI
❤1🔥1

Channel
@AoHRPI
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
32subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003815150516 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AoHRPI |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 12 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AoHRPI |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 03:02 | 32 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 31 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 31 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
38 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 34.2% | |
| 💘 | 9 | 23.7% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 13.2% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 13.2% | |
| 🗿 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
привет пацаны в кк наборчик это не открытие рп ну прост мб кто-то захочет #тейк | @AoHRPI
❤1🔥1
🎻💼} — Коллеги, давайте сразу обозначим: это последний раз, когда мы принимаем подобные агрессивные тейки в таком формате. Если хотите обсуждать что-либо — пожалуйста, делайте это спокойно и конструктивно, без переходов на агрессию. В следующий раз подобные сообщения просто не будут рассматриваться. Соблюдайте правила по тейк-постам.
💘2❤1
Простите меня, а какого хуя Астер самая скандальная личность, если во многих конфликтов этот человек учавствовал как наблюдатель, или просто блять дефал своих близких, что делала половина хрп. Вы ебнулись? На этом человеке от силы 4 известных конфликта Неанон, Ринне #тейк | @AoHRPI
🗿1
Выскажусь по поводу самых известных владельцев в коммьюнити ХРП. Ниже приведённая информация является не более чем собранными сведениями и личными догадками. Просьба отнестись со скептицизмом и уважением к моему мнению. Начнём, пожалуй, с одной из самых скандальных личностей — Астер. По личным наблюдениям, у этой персоны архетип Трикстера (при этом с сохранением индивидуальной морали), Отца и Порядка. Ниже будут п…
Пш фигня, перекрываем лавку #тейк | @AoHRPI
👎2👍1🤔1
Субъективно моё мнение о проекте и его владельце. ПШ потенциально хорошее рп, однако Апероль, как наименовал себя горе-владелец пш, который при этом не даёт никому ему помочь, попросту топит проект. И дело даже не в том, что он пиздец какой ужасный геймастер или владелец. Проблема в другом: он суетливый. Не первый раз замечаю, что он постоянно куда-то спешит, и из-за этого большая часть подаваемой им информации про…
👍2
Давайте все признаем то что пш - это ужасное рп, нихера не понятно, больше половины рп занимают головоломки✌️ #тейк | @AoHRPI
👎3🗿2👍1
КРЧ. ОБЪЕКТИВНО ПОСЛЕДНЕЕ ШОУ ХУЙНЯ В ПРОПИСКЕ #тейк | @AoHRPI
👍1
Короче, я обожаю свой хрп-проект тем, что некоторая часть игроков едва ли не начинает рыдать при решении столь простых головоломок и задач. Апироль #тейк | @AoHRPI
🍓1💘1
Почему почти каждое хоррор рп о актерах и играх, покажите мне хоть одно уцелевшее хоррор рп которое не про это #тейк | @AoHRPI
❤1💘1
Я не понимаю, почему у многих такое гипертрофированное представление о хрп. Многие игроки привыкли к тому, что это постоянные пугалки от актёров, кровь и резня. Но это же ещё и сама атмосфера ощущение некоторого давления, и непонимания, что вообще происходит. Неанон Апирррооль #тейк | @AoHRPI
❤1💘1
Выскажи своё мнение и беги. Многие ведущие цирковых рп настолько агрессивны и халатно относятся к своим же проектам, что под раздачу в конечном итоге может попасть даже собственный персонал #тейк | @AoHRPI
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @AoHRPI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AoHRPI |PONY TOWN” (@AoHRPI), 32 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AoHRPI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.