Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”–π”žπ”±π”žπ”«π”¦π”°π”ͺ

@Anti_Satanists

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

1,416subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001199625207
TypeChannel
Username@Anti_Satanists
Created8 June 2020 β€” measured β€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Anti_Satanists

Growth

1,4111,4281,419.56 August 2026 β€” 1,411 subscribers6 August 2026 β€” 1,411 subscribers6 August 2026 β€” 1,412 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 1,428 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 1,416 subscribers1,4166 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,408–1,431 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 12:381,416-12
9 Aug 2026, 19:521,428+16
6 Aug 2026, 20:011,412+1
6 Aug 2026, 07:491,411no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:501,411first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 March 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
26.4%
avg views Γ· 1,416 subscribers
Avg views / post
373
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.16%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (15 March 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total3,732
Reactions total36
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 23:51 UTCβ‰ˆ111 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

To our Lord God Jesus Christ be the Glory 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”–π”žπ”±π”žπ”«π”¦π”°π”ͺ

3 Aug 2026, 23:50 UTCβ‰ˆ143 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

The Minimum Number of Fallen Angels 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”–π”žπ”±π”žπ”«π”¦π”°π”ͺ

3 Aug 2026, 05:57 UTCβ‰ˆ165 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

D E M O N O L O G Y A book written by King James 1st of England to expose the Witcraft of Witches that had tried to assassinate him. This book was used later on by Puritans. Widely used in the Witch Trials, to recognize who the witches were. Read in the closest form to the Pronunciation of the Time, it is a tour back in time that show us the sort of belief that King James held about the Theology of Scripture. 𝔄𝔫𝔱…

2 Aug 2026, 23:49 UTCβ‰ˆ186 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”–π”žπ”±π”žπ”«π”¦π”°π”ͺ

2 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTCβ‰ˆ247 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

most mannly satanist pagan 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”–π”žπ”±π”žπ”«π”¦π”°π”ͺ

31 Jul 2026, 08:15 UTCβ‰ˆ210 viewsread 6 August 2026

If you wanna destroy Hindus, join this chat: https://t.me/+x8_NoD8gkG0xMTdk

27 Jul 2026, 07:07 UTCβ‰ˆ411 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”–π”žπ”±π”žπ”«π”¦π”°π”ͺ | 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”π”žπ”°π”¬π”«π”―π”Ά

22 Jul 2026, 18:25 UTCβ‰ˆ729 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

edgy atheist got kicked in the nuts 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”–π”žπ”±π”žπ”«π”¦π”°π”ͺ | 𝔄𝔱π”₯𝔒𝔬𝔦𝔑

19 Jul 2026, 17:37 UTCβ‰ˆ947 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”–π”žπ”±π”žπ”«π”¦π”°π”ͺ | 𝔰π”₯𝔦𝔦𝔱𝔒 | π”Έπ•Ÿπ•₯π•š 𝕆𝕣π•₯𝕙𝕠-𝔻𝕆𝕏𝕏

18 Jul 2026, 09:40 UTCβ‰ˆ583 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”–π”žπ”±π”žπ”«π”¦π”°π”ͺ

26 May 2026, 12:40 UTCβ‰ˆ1,390 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Jeran the globe earther wishes a happy birthday to Satan 🌚

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Anti_Satanists. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 190,925 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”π”žπ”°π”¬π”«π”―π”Ά
@AntiMasonry Β· 2,500
4 posts
π•Ήπ–Šπ–œ π•¬π–Œπ–Šπ–™π–†π–—π–‰
@Anti_NewAge Β· 929
2 posts
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Ίπ–‰π–Žπ–“π–Žπ–˜π–’
@antiodinism Β· 423
2 posts
𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”π”²π” π”¦π”£π”’π”―π”¦π”žπ”«π”¦π”°π”ͺ - π”Έπ•Ÿπ•₯π•š π”Ύπ•Ÿπ• π•€π•₯π•šπ•”π•šπ•€π•ž
@AntiLuciferianism Β· 868
1 post
π”Έπ•Ÿπ•₯π•š 𝕆𝕣π•₯𝕙𝕠-𝔻𝕆𝕏𝕏
@AntiOrtho Β· 805
1 post
𝔰π”₯π”¦π”¦π”±π”’γ€˜ π”Έπ•Ÿπ•₯π•š π•€π•™π•šπ•’ π•šπ•«π•π• π•ž γ€™
@AntiShiaIslam Β· 244
1 post
𝔄𝔱π”₯π”’π”¬π”¦π”‘γ€˜ π”Έπ•Ÿπ•₯π•ͺ ℍ𝕖𝕒π•₯π•™π•–π•Ÿπ•£π•ͺ γ€™
@Atheoid Β· 1,827
1 post
Redpill Rotation
@RedpillRotation Β· 952
1 post
π•Ώπ–π–Š π•±π–†π–‘π–˜π–Š π–Œπ–”π–‰ π•΄π–“π–‰π–šπ–˜π–™π–—π–ž
@thefalseindustry Β· 265
1 post
𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝 π•‚π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•π•’π•žπ•–π•€ 𝕀
@TheRealKingJamesI Β· 425
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ”„π”«π”±π”¦ π”–π”žπ”±π”žπ”«π”¦π”°π”ͺ” (@Anti_Satanists), 1,416 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Anti_Satanists.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.