This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,529–1,532 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 21:22
1,529
-3
7 Aug 2026, 00:30
1,532
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:23
1,532
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
30m 11s
Average length
2m 09s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
48 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
15
31.3%
👍
15
31.3%
💯
6
12.5%
🤬
5
10.4%
👀
4
8.33%
🔥
2
4.17%
😢
1
2.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2025 to 22 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨 Our Congress is a JOKE...
We have a woman in the House who stole 5M from FEMA.
We have a one eyed dude who has "drinking episodes" in Mexico.
We have a dude who begged Jeffrey Epstein for money after his conviction.
We have a lady who was texting with Epstein during a Congressional hearing.
We have a dude in Congress pretending to be a women.
We have a jihadist lady who married her brother.
We have a dude wh…
Seriously, if you had told me that New York City would be flooded with Muslim terrorists who are calling to murder Jews and celebrating the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, I’d have said you were insane.
I was dead wrong.
🔗 Vivid.🇮🇱 (@VividProwess)
@CherokeeOwl 🦉
@no_contactme
Ghosts? Goblins? Ghouls? 🎃
No problem.
For when things go bump in the night, the .458 SOCOM brings heavy-hitting reassurance with every pull.
This Halloween, don’t just carve pumpkins — carve out peace of mind.
👉 Trick or treat yourself to one today.
Children are among the injured in a devastating terrorist attack on a Michigan church that involved gunfire, a fire, and a possible IED.
The FBI and ATF are on the scene, while Pam Bondi has declared this was a deliberate assault on Christians gathered in worship.
JOIN 👉 Shadow Of Ezra
🚨 BREAKING: Tonight's Turning Point USA campus event at the University of Minnesota is "COMPLETELY FULL." It will be hosted by Michael Knowles.
LET'S GO! 🇺🇸🔥
🔗 Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh)
@CherokeeOwl 🦉
@no_contactme
"YOU SEE, CHARLIE LOOKED AT POLITICS AS AN ON RAMP TO JESUS"
@charliekirk1776's pastor @robmccoyus delivers a speech about not denying your faith and what Charlie wanted for everyone.
TUKER CARLSON: “Charlie believed… the only real solution is Jesus... what Charlie was really saying, is that change begins, the only change that matters, when we repent of OUR sins.”
Signed Black Horse
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AngelResQue. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,155,879 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
4
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@AngelResQue named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@tiktoknews45 named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@charliekirk1776 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@ericldaugh named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@robmccoyus named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AngelResQue USA🇺🇸” (@AngelResQue), 1,529 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AngelResQue.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
