Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Anesthesia & Pain Updates

Channel

Anesthesia & Pain Updates

@Anesthesia_Updates

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,311subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001106219741
TypeChannel
Username@Anesthesia_Updates
DescriptionAll the atest articles, research and news from worlds leading Anaesthesia & pain medical Journals. Discussion Group https://t.me/Medical_Professionals_Forum Contact us https://t.me/Contact_Updates_in_Medicine_Bot
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 March 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded20 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Anesthesia_Updates

Growth

8,3108,3118,310.520 Aug 2026, 23:45 — 8,310 subscribers21 Aug 2026, 05:43 — 8,311 subscribers20 Aug 2026, 23:4521 Aug 2026, 05:43
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,310–8,311 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 05:438,311+1
20 Aug 2026, 23:458,310first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 11 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.56%
avg views ÷ 8,311 subscribers
Avg views / post
462
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held22 (11 August 202621 August 2026)
Views total10,161
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 19:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
25
Videos
1
Links
6,950

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC252 viewsread 22 August 2026

Postoperative hypotension in patients recovering from noncardiac surgery. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2026; 137: 66–73 https://www.bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(26)00578-7/fulltext?rss=yes

21 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC243 viewsread 22 August 2026

Impact of liberal preoperative clear-fluid fasting regimens on the risk of pulmonary aspiration in children (EUROFAST): institutional fasting policy is not individual sip-til-send exposure. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2025; 135: 141–7 https://www.bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(26)00564-7/fulltext?rss=yes

20 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC285 viewsread 22 August 2026

Comparison of uncalibrated pulse power analysis with transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output monitoring during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a discordance warning https://www.bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(26)00535-0/fulltext?rss=yes

20 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC269 viewsread 22 August 2026

Quanto? https://www.bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(26)00540-4/fulltext?rss=yes

20 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC233 viewsread 22 August 2026

Challenges in interpretation of randomised clinical trials included in systematic reviews and clinical guidelines https://www.bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(26)00569-6/fulltext?rss=yes

19 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC350 viewsread 22 August 2026

Ketamine administration and postoperative mortality after major cancer surgery: a propensity-matched population-based study https://www.bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(26)00511-8/fulltext?rss=yes

19 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC320 viewsread 22 August 2026

Responsibility cannot be abdicated: rigour, proportionate evidence, and full electroencephalography-informed care in perioperative brain health. Response to Br J Anaesth 2026; 137: 269–70 https://www.bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(26)00544-1/fulltext?rss=yes

19 Aug 2026, 21:44 UTC291 viewsread 22 August 2026

Fascial plane blocks five years on: are we any closer to understanding them? https://www.bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(26)00568-4/fulltext?rss=yes

18 Aug 2026, 20:19 UTC371 viewsread 22 August 2026

Assessment of cardiopulmonary bypass-induced platelet disorders using the Quantra Qplus system: the prospective single centre PLAQUA study https://www.bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(26)00495-2/fulltext?rss=yes

18 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC343 viewsread 22 August 2026

Assessing the carbon footprint of inhalation anaesthesia, total intravenous anaesthesia, and spinal anaesthesia for a single surgical procedure: a prospective observational study https://www.bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(26)00542-8/fulltext?rss=yes

18 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC307 viewsread 22 August 2026

Atlas of Interventional Pain Management, 6th edition https://www.bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(26)00570-2/fulltext?rss=yes

17 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 22 August 2026

The evolving landscape of haemodynamic monitoring: closing the gap from innovation to equity https://www.bjanaesthesia.org/article/S0007-0912(26)00486-1/fulltext?rss=yes

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @Anesthesia_Updates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Clinical Practice guidelines
@ClinicalPharmGuideline · 59,739
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026
Artículos Médicos - Luis, el intensivista
@luiselintensivista · 72,952
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
Medinternafacil 🤓🩺
@medinternafacil · 61,823
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 August 2026
PDFology
@PDFology · 67,129
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Anesthesia & Pain Updates” (@Anesthesia_Updates), 8,311 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Anesthesia_Updates.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.