5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,750–1,753 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 17:26
1,751
-2
11 Aug 2026, 15:44
1,753
+2
8 Aug 2026, 18:04
1,751
+1
7 Aug 2026, 21:01
1,750
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:23
1,750
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.8%
avg views ÷ 1,751 subscribers
Avg views / post
207
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
7 (13 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
1,034
Reactions total
69
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
81 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
49
60.5%
👍
17
21.0%
❤🔥
6
7.41%
🙏
4
4.94%
🔥
3
3.70%
💋
1
1.23%
😁
1
1.23%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Позже, в 1990-е, мы с Юлией Андреевной общались скорее эпизодически. И тем не менее одна из наших встреч мне сильно запомнилась. Лет в 14–15 я сильно увлёкся готическими соборами, делал сравнительные таблицы, анализировал интерьеры, планы. Я сделал для бабушки презентацию и доклад. Мне кажется, даже прозвучали слова про «эволюцию стиля». Это произвело на нее впечатление, и тогда бабушка сказала, что у меня явно к это…
К столетию Юлии Андреевны Розановой
Юлия Андреевна Розанова (1926–2018), моя бабушка, сыграла существенную роль в моем становлении. Она не была архитектором, но была человеком, живо увлечённым искусством. Музыкант и педагог, с начала 1960-х гг. и более 50 лет она преподавала историю русской музыки в Московской консерватории.
Юлия Андреевна принадлежала к тому широкому кругу советской интеллигенции, кто умел создава…
«Одиссея-2026»: битва со временем
1. Введение
Ещё до премьеры нам объяснили, что фильм Нолана – это радикальный, авангардный фильм. Ведь несмотря на то, что «Одиссея» – это знаменитый древнегреческий эпос, фильм снят с учётом требований DEI, то есть с актёрами самых разных рас и ориентаций. Оставляя эту проблематику в стороне, я бы хотел сегодня разобрать ключевые сюжетные линии «Одиссеи» Гомера и «Одиссеи» Кристофе…
Продлен прием заявок на участие в премии АРХИWOOD за лучшее архитектурное сооружение из дерева!
📝 Прием заявок продлится до 15 августа 2026 года.
👥 В этом году состоится семнадцатый сезон премии АРХИWOOD, он объединит сотни экспертов по всей России.
💻 Все этапы будут освещаться на официальном сайте премии АРХИWOOD, созданном для максимального удобства участников и зрителей: быстрая подача материалов, интуитивная н…
В проектах учеников Отто Вагнера рубежа 1900-1910-х очевидны и черты раннего ар-деко, и открытие стилевых приемов, популярных в 1920-1930-е. Так, учебные проекты здания Купален в Вене (архитекторы К. Ехна, А. Николадони, Й. Хора, 1905), а также, например, проект Р. Покорни здания Терм и курорта в Феслау (1912) — все они остро сочетали в своих формах новаторский уступчатый силуэт и фантазийную геометризацию деталей. В…
В 1894-1914 годах Отто Вагнер преподавал в венской Академии искусств, и его ученики естественным образом перенимали манеру великого учителя. Созданные в сложной декоративной манере Вагнера середины 1900-х, проекты его учеников были задуманы масштабно и выполнены графически безупречно. Всё это были проекты крупных общественных сооружений, почти идентичные по стилю.(5) Однако кроме как в знаменитых постройках Вагнера —…
❤5👍3
Signed Andrey Barkhin
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @Andrey_Barkhin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лекторий Андрея Бархина” (@Andrey_Barkhin), 1,751 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Andrey_Barkhin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
