原网页已被删除。
😁1😇1

Channel
@AncheysTechTips
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002110116545 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AncheysTechTips |
| Description | Don’t let the machine do the thinking for you. |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AncheysTechTips |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 11 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 11 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (8 June 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 56 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 50.0% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 33.3% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
原网页已被删除。
😁1😇1
https://github.com/hoochanlon/Free-NTFS-for-Mac
❤2
iOS27 RAW 9 深度拆解(1) 用自己开发的 App,实测了苹果 RAW 最大更新。 苹果在 WWDC26 推出了新一代 RAW 9 解码管线,在iOS27上,通过 Core ML 联合完成去马赛克与降噪。本期实测佳能5D3与索尼A7 II,对比RAW 8、系统相册和ACR,看看它是否真的能在降低噪声的同时保留发丝与皮肤纹理。 RAW 9潜力很强,但当前iOS 27 Beta仍存在疑似泛绿问题,支持机型也比较有限。 #RAW9 #RAW #摄影后期 #iOS27 #计算摄影 @拾光相机App: 发布视频 播放量:3561 弹幕:4 评论:38 点赞:183 投币:88 收藏:106 转发:31 发布日期:2026-07-25 02:00:00 上传日期:2026-07-24 12:04:20 🔝> : 一个独立开发者的悲惨日常:代码自己写,UI 自己画,视频自己剪,BUG 自己修,差评自己扛,广告自己打 🥲 你们还能…
網信辦發佈7款「手机端侧生成式人工智能服务」的備案資訊,包含Apple智能和三星蓋樂世AI。 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/5MTWh4pWVAlL71RQbU-Udg
https://fixupx.com/sunnny1583/status/2075796043195994317 iOS 27 到 beta 3 一直在微调液态玻璃滑块,现在回到了类似 beta 1 的状态,最透明的情况下文字和图标边缘会产生明显的锯齿很不美观;而且可读性差劲。 PS:我觉得默认一档的液态玻璃是最漂亮的。现在还解决了液态玻璃动画连续性的问题(比如音乐app中缩放播放界面最后一帧)。 喜欢透明质感的话还是需要往回拉一点加点模糊。 目前还是不建议升级 beta,一想到还有两个月的bug要品尝😑每天跑几十M的log。
😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
GB/T 22657.1-2008 邮件封面书写规范
❤1
iOS 26 正式版的 Liquid Glass 通过降低渲染分辨率,保证了使用流畅度。 在 26 上因为加了一点点模糊,不容易看出来,27 现在可以选择调成全透明就能观察到暴露了。 https://x.com/i/status/2065363940150788472 很聪明的选择。
今年 WWDC26 技术视频,Camera 和图像处理相关的主题讲解汇总: https://developer.apple.com/cn/videos/all-videos Camera 相关的有: 构建灵敏还秒开的三方相机 App https://developer.apple.com/cn/videos/play/wwdc2026/303 实现 2400 万像素和 4800 万像素高分辨率照片拍摄(注:之前 iOS 三方 Camera App 拿不到48MP的 Quad Bayer RAW) https://developer.apple.com/cn/videos/play/wwdc2026/304 使用 Core Image 增强 RAW 图像处理 https://developer.apple.com/cn/videos/play/wwdc2026/305 让三方 iOS App 支持 Center Stag…
安结Tech pinned a video
macOS更新,允许展开任务栏更多图标到刘海左侧;电池图标更改;网络连接优先显示有线以太网图标;
FindMy 允许单独对某人隐藏定位,目前暂无法设置时间,可以手动取消,会在次日4:00自动解除。
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @AncheysTechTips. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“安结Tech” (@AncheysTechTips), 11 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AncheysTechTips.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.