3 measurements spanning 5 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,565–1,571 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 01:38
1,570
+2
12 Sept 2026, 08:19
1,568
+2
11 Sept 2026, 00:22
1,566
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.6%
avg views ÷ 1,570 subscribers
Avg views / post
229
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026
Posts held
17 (10 June 2026 – 8 September 2026)
Views total
457
Reactions total
10
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Sept 2026, 00:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 40s
Average length
1m 40s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
138 reactions across 17 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
129
93.5%
👍
9
6.52%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
كتب الأخ الأستاذ محفوظ الأحمد، وهو من الباحثين والمحققين البارزين في الفقه والحديث وهو من أصول بنغالية ومقيم في بريطانية، مراجعة تقويمية لكتاب الذاكرة الحية، جزاه الله كل خير، وقد سعدت بلقياه في سمرقند في مؤتمر البخاري مؤخرا.
يُعَدُّ تاريخ تدوين الحديث النبوي في عصرنا الحاضر من الموضوعات العلمية المهمة التي تستحق عناية خاصة. فعلى الرغم من أن علماء القرون الإسلامية الأولى قد أنجزوا أعمالًا علمية وبحثية متنوعة في خدم…
قال الله تعالى لموسى وهارون عليهما السلام وهما ذاهبان إلى فرعون: ﴿فَقُولَا لَهُ قَوْلًا لَيِّنًا لَعَلَّهُ يَتَذَكَّرُ أَوْ يَخْشَى﴾.
تتوقف هذه الخطبة عند معنى القول اللين، ما شروطه؟ ولماذا قد تكون الكلمة صحيحة في معناها، لكنها خاطئة في أسلوبها أو توقيتها أو مآلها؟
https://youtu.be/NA6E0BkRxdA?is
تتناول الخطبة مفاهيم التقوى والورع، وتقرأهما من خلال علاقتهما يمفهوم الفتنة والبلاء، حين يُعرض الحرام على الإنسان وتتهيأ أسبابه.
التقوى ليست مجرد خوف في القلب، بل وقاية تحجز عن المعصية، والورع هو أثرها العملي حين يكفّ الإنسان نفسه عما يريب ويبتعد عن مواطن السقوط.
وإنما تعرف لحظات التقوى والورع حال الابتلاء والتختبار الذي يعرض على المرء، فيتاح له الحرام ويتخلى عنه لله.
وتختتم الخطبة بحديث الغار والسبعة الذين يظلهم ال…
تتناول هذهالمحاضرة الشخصية العلمية للشيخ عبد الفتاح أبو غدة رحمه الله، مركزة على مشروع العلمي والتربوي وكتاب «صفحات من صبر العلماء على شدائد العلم والتحصيل».
وقد ألقيت هذه المحاضرة في رحاب الجامع الاموي في دمشق.
تبرز المحاضرة سمات الشيخ: تحبيب العلم، تعظيم الزمن، تربية الطلاب على الصبر والجد، الدقة في التحقيق، وخدمة علوم الحديث. كما تسلط الضوء على منهجه في استحضار سير العلماء نماذج عملية لتحويلها إلى مادة تربوية تصن…
يُعلن مسجدُ بني أميةَ الكبير بدمشق عن محاضرةٍ لفضيلةِ الدكتور أنس سرميني بعنوان:
الشيخ عبد الفتاح أبو غدة وشخصيته العلميّة: قراءة في كتابه صفحات من صبر العلماء على شدائد العلم
وذلك بعد صلاة العصر يوم الأربعاء
29 صفر 1448 هـ
الموافق 12 / 8 / 2026 م
اللهمَّ أدِم على الشامِ وأهلهِ نعمةَ العلماءِ وأدِمِ الأمويّ منارةً للعلمِ والعلماءِ
شرعنا بتوفيق الله بالتعليق على هذا الكتاب الماتع الأسبوع الماضي بمقر دار العلامة عبد الفتاح أبو غدة للحديث النبوي وعلومه في حلب، ونسأل الله أن يتمه علينا في عشرة مجالس إن شاء الله. والدعوة لطلاب الحديث الشريف.
المجلس الاول وشرح الباب الاول من الكتاب في ماهيه علوم الحديث.
https://youtu.be/CXxtQnyWOK0?si
كلما ازددت علمًا نافعًا ازددت إنسانية
لماذا كانت أول هبة وهبها الله لآدم بعد الخلق هي العلم؟ ولماذا ترك موسى عليه السلام مقام التعليم ليصحب الخضر متعلمًا؟ وما الذي يجعل العلم النافع طريقًا إلى خشية الله، وإنصاف الناس، وعمارة الأرض؟
مشاهدة نافعة بإذن الله، ويسعدني أن تشاركها مع من تحب.
https://youtu.be/VswbyTkvMtk?si
إن تاريخ علم الحديث ومناهج توثيقه يظهران أن السنة نُقِلت نقلاً شبكياً متعاضداً متآزراً، أدارته طبقة من المحدثين النقاد الذين لم يكونوا مجرد ناقلين للأخبار، وإنما كانوا الذاكرة الحية لهذه الأمة، وحراس وعيها الديني. فيديو مبسط عن فصول الكتاب وأفكاره.
«في نقض أوهام القرآنيين»
تتناول هذه المحاضرة نشأة تيار منكري السنة أو التيار القرآني، وأبرز مقولاتهم المؤسسة، والسياقات الفكرية التي أسهمت في تشكله، مع تحليل مواطن الخلل المنهجي والمعرفي في خطابه، وبيان آثاره في التشريع الإسلامي. ويمكن عد المحاضرة حاشيةً على بودكاست بسط "النقل الشبكي للسنة وكيف نثق بأحاديث عمرها 1400 سنة" وما نشأت عنه من حوارات ونقاشات في فضاءات التعليق على أفكاره.
https://youtu.be/lmjy2DJiAmA?si
#Yangiliklar
#Islom_sivilizatsiyasi_forumi
SOʻZ – ANJUMAN ISHTIROKCHILARIGA!
👤 Muhammad Anas Sarmini – Istanbul “29-may” universiteti professori:
“Imom Buxoriyning fiqhiy merosi va ilmiy qarashlari hamon dolzarb”
Avvalo, ushbu ilmiy anjumanni tashkil etishga xizmati singgan barcha tashkilotchilar va ilmiy qoʻmita aʼzolariga, ayniqsa, muhtaram ustoz doktor Muhammad Nosiriyga samimiy minnatdorlik bildiraman. Ularni…
❤6
Signed Anas SARMINI
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @AnasSarmini. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
روائع التلاوات القرآنية @quran_menshwe0baset · 27,277 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة الدكتور أنس سرميني” (@AnasSarmini), 1,570 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AnasSarmini.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
